Thursday, July 2, 2015

Frankly It Stinks!

Congressional franking costs are a total waste of tax dollars; members of congress ought to stop mailing it in.

Frankly It Stinks!


I caught a little item in last Thursday's New York Times that got my growl going again.

The Times reports that Virginia Democratic Rep. Gerald Connolly was whining about majority-party Republicans editing his taxpayer financed newsletter to constituents in which he attempted to label Republicans as out to "eliminate" Medicare with a "radical plan."

Editors changed the wording to say the GOP wants to "change" Medicare with support from private insurers.

The Harvard grad and former Senate staffer said, "This is like Soviet censorship. It's intolerable. Unbelievable."

What he doesn't say is editing of congressional newsletters is common practice, done by a bipartisan Commission on Congressional Mailing Standards to members of both parties specifically to avoid overtly political slams by anyone using tax dollars for mailing.

I have no argument with Connolly's thoughts on Medicare or Republicans. He's entitled to them.

My argument is with the fact that Congress has what's called a franking privilege (one of many privileges) which means we pay for these junk-mail congressional newsletters. Who wants or needs them?

And even though mailing costs dropped dramatically in recent years, the latest cost analysis by the Congressional Research Service says these mailings cost taxpayers $16.7 million in 2009.

To me that's a boat-load of bucks to pay for something we don't need, want or care about. It's totally unnecessary.

What ought to happen is everybody who gets one of these wastes of time, money and paper should call, email or write their representative and just say, hey, stop mailing it in.




Daily News Political Columnist
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
John Baer has been covering politics and government for the Daily News since 1987. The National Journal in 2002 called Baer one of the country's top 10 political journalists outside Washington, saying Baer has, "the ability to take the skin off a politician without making it hurt too much." E-mail John at

John is the author of the book "On The Front Lines of Pennsylvania Politics: Twenty-Five Years of Keystone Reporting" (The History Press, 2012). Reach John at

John Baer Daily News Political Columnist
Also on
letter icon Newsletter