Friday, July 3, 2015

A truth gap in gender pay?

That gender pay gap pushed by the White House and a Democratic candidate for governor might be all that it seems.

A truth gap in gender pay?


From the White House to Pennsylvania's Democratic primary race, a gap in pay for men and women is once again getting of attention.

But it's also getting challenged.

President Obama this week again calls for action on a Paycheck Fairness Act requiring employers to disclose salary info, protect workers who inquire about same and make employers liable to pay discrimination civil suits.

The president again offers the stat that women make 77-cents for every dollar a man makes doing the same work.

And in Pennsylvania, Democratic frontrunner Tom Wolf is airing a campaign TV ad using the same stat, saying "We've got to do better. There's really no excuse."

There is, however, an argument over the stat.

A Washington Post fact check piece says the 77-cents number is based on Census Bureau annual wage data that does not consider hourly wages or salaried workers not paid on an hourly basis.

Annual wage data, for example, does not factor teachers who work nine months of the year and include, as Mitt Romney would say, binders full of women.

(You can read the full Post's "Fact Checker" here: It awards the President two "Pinocchios" for continuing to use the stat.)

The Post also notes more women work part time, leave the workforce for periods of time to have and raise children, seek jobs with flexible hours but lower pay and often enter careers with less compensation.

It notes a 2013 Georgetown University survey showing the highest valued college majors in terms of eventually making money -- engineering and science -- are dominated by males, while the 10 least valued for future bucks -- such as early childhood education and social work -- are dominated by females.

The point here is not that women don't work hard, almost always carry more burden in families or deserve equal pay for equal work.

The point is there are many factors that contribute to gender pay gaps, and using one statistic to argue a case against them isn't telling the whole story.

Presenting an argument based on selective data is, in this case, clearly good politics for Democrats. But it's clearly not the best way to build good policy.

Daily News Political Columnist
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
John Baer has been covering politics and government for the Daily News since 1987. The National Journal in 2002 called Baer one of the country's top 10 political journalists outside Washington, saying Baer has, "the ability to take the skin off a politician without making it hurt too much." E-mail John at

John is the author of the book "On The Front Lines of Pennsylvania Politics: Twenty-Five Years of Keystone Reporting" (The History Press, 2012). Reach John at

John Baer Daily News Political Columnist
Also on
letter icon Newsletter