NJ says no to 60-year storage of spent nuclear fuel
Christie administration seeks to join legal action challenging a federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission rule allowing nuclear plants to keep spent fuel on site for 60 years after the licensed life of a reactor.
NJ says no to 60-year storage of spent nuclear fuel
Sandy Bauers, Inquirer GreenSpace Columnist
New Jersey is entering the fray about spent nuclear fuel.
Today, it sought permission from a federal appeals court to join with New York, Vermont and Connecticut in their challenge of a Nuclear Regulatory Commission decision to allow spent fuel to remain at nuclear power plants for 60 years past the licensed life of the reactor.
In other words, the place could be shut down, and the radioactive fuel could remain on-site for another 60 years.
The previous rule allowed the fuel to remain on site for 30 years.
What to do with the fuel has been a national problem. The federal government proposed a storage facility at Nevada's Yucca Mountain, but that plan fell through. Some plants with spent fuel and no where else to put it are resorting to "dry cask" storage, where the spent rods are placed in massive vaults outside the reactors.
The challenge, filed with the U.S. Appellate Court for the District of Columbia Circuit, contends the NRC acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner in developing the new 60-year rule, and failed to perform an environmental impact statement as required by the National Environmental Policy Act, a state Department of Environmental Protection press release said.
"We are joining in this challenge because of the potential of significant public health and safety implications, and the potential impact on New Jersey's environment,'' said DEP Commissioner Bob Martin. "The failure of the NRC to conduct an adequate environmental impact statement is troubling. The federal government has an obligation to develop a permanent plan for nuclear waste storage, and cannot avoid an answer by extending the time that radioactive waste is allowed to remain on sites in New Jersey and across the nation. That is not acceptable.''
New Jersey has four operating nuclear reactors that are affected by NRC rules: Oyster Creek in Lacey Township, Hope Creek in Lower Alloways Creek, and two units at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station, also in Lower Alloways Creek.
The first announced closure is for Oyster Creek, owned by the Exelon Corp, which last December agreed to close the plant by the end of 2019, ten years before its license expires, rather than build a cooling tower, as the DEP had required. The agreement allows Exelon to store its spent nuclear fuel on site until the federal Department of Energy accepts it for permanent storage at a geological repository, the DEP said.
In February, New York, Vermont, and Connecticut filed a petition for review of the NRC rule. The Natural Resources Defense Council, Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, Riverkeeper, and Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, sought to join that action.
View the DEP's filing at: http://www.nj.gov/dep/docs/nrcmotion20110315.pdf
View the NRC's rule at: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=NRC-2008-0404-0166
"How to increase your carbon footprint in everyday life": regulate nuclear out of existence and drive an electric car— MaggieL
@MaggieL, if you never read another book, read "Power to Save the World: The Truth About Nuclear Energy" by Gwyneth Cravens. Like you, Ms. Cravens at one time believed a lot of things about nuclear energy that simply weren't true. For starters try this interview with her: http://www.wired.com/science/planetearth/news/2007/12/nuclear_qa ... My Best...- Olney, did you have a point to make? Or are you just shilling for the book? Hint: The Inky is killing URLs in comments.— MaggieL
GreenSpace - her column about how to reduce your carbon footprint in everyday life - appears every other Monday in Health & Science. Reach Sandy at sbauers@phillynews.com.
- Former DEP secretary John Hanger
- A daily forecast of water quality in the Schuylkill River
- Academy of Natural Sciences’ Center for Environmental Policy
- All about Philly recycling
- Baltimore Sun’s environmental blog
- Bucks County Audubon Society
- California’s Beth Terry goes without
- Citizen journalism on the environment.
- Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future
- Clean Air Council in Philadelphia
- Clean Water Action in PA
- Delaware River Basin Commission
- Delaware Riverkeeper Network
- Delaware Valley Ornithological Club
- Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission
- Dumpster Divers of Philadelphia
- Energy Coordinating Agency
- Environment New Jersey
- Environmental issues and Transition Cheltenham
- Environmental news and commentary from grist.org
- Green Living from the Natural Resources Defense Countil
- Greenspace blog
- Interfaith Partners for the Environment
- Mayor’s Office of Sustainability
- Mother Jones' enviro blog
- National Geogoraphic’s Green Guide
- New Jersey Audubon Society
- New Jersey Environmental Federation
- NJ environmental policy expert Bill Wolfe
- NJ Pinelands Commission
- NJ PIRG
- NJ wildlife and conservation expert Larry Niles
- NJ’s American Littoral Society
- NJ’s Clean Ocean Action
- PennEnvironment
- Pennsylvania Center for Environmental Education
- Pennsylvania environmental advocacy
- Pennsylvania Environmental Council
- Philadelphia Air Management Services
- Philly urban sustainability
- PhillyCompost
- Philly’s Women’s Health and Environmental Network
- Pinelands Preservation Alliance
- RecycleNOW Philadelphia
- Regional air quality partnership
- Sierra Club, NJ Chapter
- Sierra Club, Pennsylvania Chapter
- Sustainable Delaware County
- The Daily Green
- The Nature Conservancy, Pennsylvania Chapter
- Transition Cheltenham
- Transition Town Media
- Treehugger green living site
- Valley Forge Audubon Society
- What’s happening birdwise at Cape May
- Wissahickon Growing Greener
- Wyncote Audubon Society
