Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
share
email
font size
options
 
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
Michael Cera, in the inevitable hoodie, on left. Shia LaBeouf, in corporate neckwear, on right.

Social networking sites are atwitter in anticipation of the upcoming book, The Accidental Billionaires (to be published Tuesday) and David Fincher film, The Social Network (screenplay by Aaron Sorkin) about Facebook's founder Mark Zuckerberg. (Hat tip: A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago).

The two names bruited about to play the shaggy and shifty Zuckerberg, the socially-challenged guy sued by his partners, are Michael Cera (Arrested Development, Juno, Year One) and Shia LaBeouf (Transformers, Disturbia, Indiana Jones XXXVI). These gifted young actors share offbeat timing and self-deprecating humor but little else. Cera is an Indieworld darling (see Juno, Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist, the upcoming Paper Heart) while LaBeouf  has been anointed Bankable Hollywood Youngling. I like them both, but if I was casting this movie I'd go with Cera, who would be a bigger surprise as the guy who sells out his partners, than LaBeouf, so eager for bigtime success that it would not be a surprise if he elbowed the competition to get to the finish line. (Not that it matters, but Cera more resembles Zuckerberg.) In other words, Cera plays loveable losers, LaBeouf eyes-on-the-prize winners. It's like the difference between Matt Dillon and Tom Cruise.

Your thoughts? Favorite Cera and LaBeouf roles.

 

Posted by Carrie Rickey @ 4:49 PM  Permalink | 3 comments
Comments   
Posted 06:43 PM, 07/08/2009
MorganL
Agreed- LaBeouf has a conniving quality about him, maybe its that slick veneer he sports. I'd take painfully awkward and endearing Cera anyday!
Comment removed.
Posted 04:04 PM, 07/10/2009
wwolfe
I've enjoyed Cera in the movies you mentioned. (His work in "Juno" was particularly good - I can't imagine the movie working as well without his performance: it allowed me to see what I was supposed to like about Ellen Paige's character.) He needs good directors to help him avoid the trap of becoming a collection of too-familiar gestures and mannerisms. On the other hand, I don't enjoy LaBeouf. It's not that he's bad, but he seems to make the most obvious choice as an actor in every situation. I admit that some of my feelings come from my resentment at feeling as though the powers that be in Hollywood are giving me no choice but to accept him as a major star, when he just doesn't seem that special, in either looks or talent, to me. The best work I've seen from him so far was his small role in "Bobby," where he didn't have to carry the movie with his charisma and talent. Maybe that's a sign that he'd be happier in character roles?
3 comments
About Carrie Rickey

Carrie Rickey has been The Philadelphia Inquirer’s film critic for 21 years. She has reviewed films as diverse as Water and The Waterboy, profiled celebrities from Lillian Gish to Will Smith, and reported on technological breakthroughs from the video revolution to the rise of movies on demand. Her reviews are syndicated nationwide and she is a regular contributor to Entertainment Weekly. Rickey’s essays appear in numerous anthologies, including The Rolling Stone History of Rock & Roll, The American Century, and the Library of America’s American Movie Critics.

ARCHIVES

All blog items posted before May 23, 2008, can be accessed at http://blogs.phillynews.com/inquirer/flickgrrl/.