You're about to find out what your health insurance really costs
Here's a quick question. How much does your health insurance cost? You probably have no idea.
You’re about to find out what your health insurance really costs
Here’s a quick question. How much does your health insurance cost? You probably have no idea.
Most Americans get coverage through an employer – either their own, their spouse’s or their parent’s. The employer usually picks up most of the tab, somewhere between 50 and 80%. You probably know the size of your share, since it is taken out of each paycheck. But few people know the size of the entire bill.
That is about the change. Starting this year, the W-2 form you receive from your employer will include the full amount that was paid for your health coverage. (That’s the form you file with your tax return listing compensation for the year. Employers who file fewer than 250 of them are exempt.) When you see it, you may be in for a big surprise.
Take a look at Box 12. If you received health coverage, you will see the code “DD” followed by an amount. That’s how much your employer paid. There’s a good chance it’s a lot more than you thought.
The average individual policy cost $5,615 in 2012 and the average family policy $15,745. Some plans cost much more – over $20,000. If you are like most workers, only a small portion of that, about a quarter on average, is deducted from your paychecks. The rest is compensation you may not have realized you were getting.
The cost of health coverage was not reported until now because it is not subject to income tax. The money is a benefit you receive tax-free, so the IRS has no need to know how much it is. For most workers, this ignorance is bliss. They enjoy financial protection from health care expenses and have no idea what it really costs.
The problem is that many workers pay the cost without realizing it. That’s because their employers make up for the expense by paying less in salary. If Box 12 on your W-2 lists, say, $15,000, there’s a good chance you could be making thousands of dollars more in salary if your employer didn’t provide health benefits.
The change in reporting was mandated by the health reform law. The purpose is to make you more cost-conscious. With knowledge of what coverage really costs, workers may be more open to accepting cheaper plans in return for higher salaries. That could help to push spending down throughout the health care system.
The law does not change the tax treatment of your health coverage. It is still tax-free, if you get it through an employer. While some fear the new reporting rule will make it easier for the government to tax health benefits in the future, there are no plans to do so. A tax change would require that Congress pass another health reform law, and that is not likely to happen anytime soon.
Lest you think the new rule was an insidious provision slipped in by Obamacare’s architects, it actually had clear bipartisan support. It was originally proposed by two Republican senators – Charles Grassley of Iowa and Michael Enzi of Wyoming – and two Democrats – Max Baucus of Montana and Ron Wyden of Oregon.
America has the most expensive health care system in the world. While cost increases have moderated in recent years, they are unsustainable in the long run. Few of us appreciate how much of the expense we actually bear – often with each paycheck. Thanks to health reform, we will now have a better idea. That could be a first step in bringing costs under control.
JCWTTS1....Fact, I now pay more in taxes and guess what, I am considered lower income. My health care costs have gone up for a few years now and I have co-pays on things I did not have co-pays on before in order top pay for Obamacare. Now, please, explain to me once more how this is a good thing for a lower income family? Obamacare sucks and that man will never go up on the mountain where real men that were "for the people and by the people" are immortalized. Keep praying to your fake God! PhillyTaz
If Obamacare is so great, why are unions and Congress exempt? Shouldn't we all share in the sacrifice? LouDiamondPhillipsheadScrewdriver
"there’s a good chance you could be making thousands of dollars more in salary if your employer didn’t provide health benefits."
What a bunch of BULL !!
NO Employer will pay MORE in salary to a worker in exchange for no Health Benefits.
Name ONE Employer who PAYS MORE for no benfits.
PS: 60 year old, hard working responsible couple, NO Health Problems, NEVER used the Blue Cross/Blue Shield we've been paying for for 42 years.
I have NEVER met an employer who would pay MORE for NO BENEFITS. acitizen
PhillyTaz -- Obviously I don't know the details of your personal financial situation but ObamaCare hasn't gone into effect. We're still in the roll out process. jcwtts1
JCWTTS!...I respect that answer, but I am already paying higher everything before the full effect, and there is no one that can tell me that eventually it will be better for my family and I. Everything that does go up stays up and I have yet to have any taxes or fees lowered in regards to my healthcare. Fact is, we all will be paying more to pay for illegal aliens getting benefits, people that out right refuse to have health insurance and those that feel they are entiteled to free everything and that seem to get away with it even while working people like us pay more and more. PhillyTaz
FROM : businessweekly.readingeagle.com/?p=4366
Barbara R. Coyle, laboratory director for M.J. Reider Associates Inc. of Reading. Coyle blames providers as much as the legislation’s ambiguity for her cost concerns. With 40 employees, Coyle is under the 50-worker minimum for which the law mandates employer coverage.
M.J. Reider, an environmental testing laboratory, could thus save a sizable chunk by simply dropping coverage for employees. Coyle said she now spends $402,000 annually on health care for 40 employees, a cost she said increases 20 to 40 percent per year. The company would spend only $120,000 in penalties ($3,000 per employee) should it kill its coverage.
“I could increase my bottom line by $282K if we opted (to drop coverage),” Coyle emailed. “…
NOTICE Coyle did NOT SAY THE EMPLOYEES WAGES WOULD INCREASE.
No Benefits would " INCREASE MY BOTTOM LINE " acitizen
Health Insurance Premium Increases: 1994 - 18%, 1995 - 18%, 1996 - 5%, 1997 - 45%, 1998 - 120%, 2001 - 18%, 2003 - 11%, 2006 - 23%, 2008 - 19%, 2009 - 22%, 2010 - 19 %, 2011 - 11%. All other years were increased less than 10% except 1994, 1999, 2000, 2007 where premiums were decreased.
Increases have NOTHING to do with HCA.
It ALL about the BOTTOM LINE. Profits.
acitizen
Simple question....
Is it fair for people to own and drive a car without insurance? Why not? Because it puts the financial burden on the "other guy" through higher insurance rates not to mention any costs incurred if you get hit by an uninsured motorist.
How then, is it fair for a working adult not to carry health insurance? It's not and you can't argue that it is.
Rokit
The Bobski5000 owning a business???
If you google Bobski5000, it spends most of its time posting here because that is all you find, philly.com posts from this very busy biz owner. Helluva way to run a biz. Then again, its probably something related to overpriced medical devices of which he will then over charge medicaid and medicare.
Any biz owner who claims to love obamacare is part of the problem and running a scam business, feeding off the public trough. Shocker! Paul Revered
My book "A Crime Not a Crisis" explains why Pennsylvania health insurance costs so much: http://www.luvpower.org/painsure.html Paul Glover
should have included a public option buy-in to medicare; at least for people over 40. a MANDATE without a public optipn is not a good idea, imo. also, just beco one may voted for Obama -instead of a tax cheating liar- does NOT mean they support "obamacare" or some of his other programs. the country really doesnt get the best candidates to choose from. and it took bush/cheney/gop 8 yrs. to wreck the country via deficits (from a SURPLUS) the unfunded wars, ETC. obama should get 8 to try and turn it around. tfcino1
The real crooks are the insurance companies. CEO's make Millions just in bonuses bmax
Slowly but surely, all the moron Obama voters are finding out what Obamacare is doing to them. LMAO, morons! Barbouze
Obamatron Logic, these are the people who are so lost to their self deluded propaganda, there is 0 hope for them and to see their resume, LOOK AT PHILLY
Hurry up and get in line for your Walmart career LOL!
..."95% of all economist believe that the stimulus in the US worked and should have been more...Don't worry, Wal-mart and the like will start hiring again and unemployment will be back around 6% again soon" Paul Revered
All the Obama fans have shown up to try to talk their way out of the inevitable crash of our healthcare system. It's going to be a long 4 years trying to root for your hero while all the evidence piles up against you. Phillies2008WSChamps





Robert I. Field, Ph.D., J.D., M.P.H, professor of law at the Earle Mack School of Law and professor of health management and policy at the School of Public Health at Drexel University. He is the author of Health Care Regulation in America: Complexity, Confrontation and Compromise, a comprehensive overview of the government’s oversight of health care published by Oxford University Press.