Sunday, May 19, 2013
Sunday, May 19, 2013

What Paul Ryan's Medicaid cuts would do to your health care

What's the biggest change Paul Ryan wants to make to American health care? It isn't his privatization plan for Medicare, as significant as that is. Ryan wants to make even bigger changes to Medicaid, the program that covers health care for the poor.

11 comments

What Paul Ryan's Medicaid cuts would do to your health care

POSTED: Wednesday, September 26, 2012, 2:37 PM
Filed Under: Robert Field

by Robert I. Field, Ph.D., J.D., M.P.H.

What’s the biggest change Paul Ryan wants to make to American health care?

It isn’t his privatization plan for Medicare, as significant as that is. Ryan wants to make even bigger changes to Medicaid, the program that covers health care for the poor.

In fact, his proposed budget would cut almost twice as much from Medicaid as it would from Medicare.

Medicaid is administered separately by each state. The federal government sets overall rules for what must be covered and provides most of the funding, but the states do the heavy lifting in actually running it. 

Medicaid costs have recently risen dramatically. They pose a major fiscal burden for many states. For some of them, Medicaid is the largest single budget item, even with the federal government picking up most of the tab.

Under health reform, Medicaid will expand to cover more people. The federal government will pay most of the added expense, but some states fear the program will still be too expensive.

Ryan’s solution is to slash the program indiscriminately. He would cut over $1.4 billion in Medicaid spending over the next decade – a budget reduction of 34 percent.

And he would eliminate almost all federal rules on what must be covered. Medicaid would become a block grant program in which the federal government turns funds over to the states to use as they wish.

Needless to say, the Ryan cuts would make the Medicaid expansion under health reform impossible.

By most accounts, the result would be drastic.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicts the Ryan plan would force states to reduce payments to providers (which are already very low), limit eligibility, provide less extensive coverage, or kick in more money themselves. Any of those outcomes could push the program to the breaking point.

The nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that the Ryan plan would knock more than 30 million people off of Medicaid rolls.

You may wonder what this means for you. If you’re not poor, would you notice any difference?

The answer is that you would notice a huge difference. The cuts could cripple the entire health care system.

Medicaid is a financial lifeline for many hospitals, including most of those that serve inner cities. Without it, huge proportions of their patients would lack any means of payment. And without payment for their services, many of them would have no way to stay in business.

Where would the patients go? Many would go without care, creating a potential public health crisis. Others would seek care at the hospitals that remain, mostly those in more affluent areas. That could severely strain their resources and disrupt the health care systems of entire regions.

Ryan deserves credit for offering a specific plan to reform health care. None of his Republican colleagues have so far done so.

However, his proposal applies a sledgehammer to a complex problem. It would destroy a large portion of American health care in the name of saving it. And with it, the health and lives of countless people.

11 comments
Comments  (11)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:53 PM, 08/17/2012
    I really hope for someday when I read an opinion it tells all the facts or both sides of the story. Even a Dr (above) slants it to fit his agenda. Big burden on the states but the Feds pay most...(Which Is It??), Health reform the Fed will pay most of it. NOT! The Fed will increase the subsidy for only 3 to 5 years then the States must take on the burden after that. 1.4 Billion taken from Medicaid. Is that opposed to the 700+BILLION taken from Medicare by Obamacare?? Tell the facts Doctor!!
    keapitreal
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:39 AM, 08/20/2012
    he is a phD and a JD not an MD or DO. so referring to him as dr is technically correct he is not a "doctor"
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:09 PM, 08/17/2012
    No Bucks No Buck Rodgers…
    CrashTestCorzine
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:14 PM, 08/17/2012
    You see, they only want to tell you one side of the story hoping you will believe it and not fact check. With the invent of instant global communications and google, one can find out just how far left this column has presented. Much like KYW's Reporter round up. "to help you understand todays news". They try and tell you how to think.
    Anyone who has a brain can see this imposter in the oval office is trying to ruin this country and has largely succeeded.
    Hatfield_ham
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:50 PM, 08/17/2012
    More one sided left wing reporting....guess I'll get banned for saying left wing reporting. Remember news outlets cry about 1st amendment rights and sensor ship but they do the same by blocking comments.
    Mystified
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:01 PM, 08/17/2012
    Yeah, facts are always "left wing". The numbers are Ryan's, you twit.
    CiceroSpuriousDeodatus
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:43 PM, 08/17/2012
    Hi Cicero...i dont see any numbers in that article coming directly from Ryan, do you?? Who is the twit you dummy.
    Sane1
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:36 PM, 08/18/2012
    The left talks about "cuts" in sending, while the right talks about a "decrease" in growth. The numbers show that the government would spend less on Medicaid under Ryan's plan than it would under Obama. Ryan says this difference in spending is necessary so that people will start using their own initiative and pay their own way instead of waiting for government handouts. The problem is that many of the people whose medical bills are paid by this particular government program or children and the disabled. These are people who CANNOT take care of themselves, no matter how much "encouragement" we provide.
    litgeek
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:49 PM, 08/18/2012
    It is my understanding that the Ryan plan would still cover catestrophic diseases and situations. It looked to me like the plan would try and limit the no insurance people from running to the ER every time they had an ache or pain. That is the burden that the system cannot handle. My employer is doing the same, I had a PPO and could run to the doctor for a $20 copay everytime I had a fever. Now, I have to know what that will cost me in a co-insurance situation. I think the key is responsibility. I believe that the patient should share in the responsibility of the health care choices they make. That is not happening now as the government has their back. It is the same philisophy that should be applied to all social programs. The abuse in our social programs is atrocious. Costs billions each and every year. That include the hospitals, doctors and patients. It should be assistance, not a life style.
    ttulibacki
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:15 PM, 08/22/2012
    instead of taking health insurance from the poor who have nothing (for whatever reason - maybe the economy or mental issues, etc.) why not take the money out of the Congress or Senators' benefits which are lifetime and the very best. Why are they not receiving the same benefits as other state employees? Again, regarding uninsured poor people, who will end up paying higher premiums?
    francine kelly
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:21 PM, 11/11/2012
    I think most of the people here have their mind made up already as to what they will believe, facts or no facts. While the article is not written in a comparison and contrast style, it is based in facts. There is always Fox network or MSNBC for those who don't won't to hear all sides. And no, you can't view both and get to the middle.
    V. Reason


About this blog

From Obamacare to Medicare to managed care to genomics, this blog reports on and analyzes the laws, government policies, and political trends that are transforming the care we receive and the way we pay for it. The Field Clinic dissects the latest health care news, explaining it and putting it in context. Read more about the panel here.

Robert I. Field, Ph.D., J.D., M.P.H. Professor, Earle Mack School of Law & Drexel School of Public Health
Erica Cohen A third-year law student concentrating in health at Drexel
Drew Harris, DPM, MPH Program Director, Master of Science in Health Policy at Jefferson School of Public Health
David B. Nash, MD, MBA Founding Dean of the Jefferson School of Population Health
Blog archives:
Past Archives: