Monday, July 6, 2015

Moon Colonies, the Fantasy and the Reality

Some Apes Like the Idea of a moon colony. Others say it's a nice place to visit but they wouldn't want to live there.

Moon Colonies, the Fantasy and the Reality


I was surprised how much support Newt Gingrich got for his proposal for a moon colony. The Atlantic, for example, praised this as visionary.

There’s a big difference between a colony where people settle and a research station where people go to do science and then return home. It would be visionary to have a research station on the moon, and even perhaps a program allowing students, journalists and teachers to visit too. I’d sign up immediately.  

Building real estate up there is a different story. When I visited the South Pole Station, I was excited to go but happy to have a two way ticket. People do stay for months at a time, but many have reported stresses and conflicts that result from being isolated with a small group of people. The famous Biosphere II experiment out in the Arizona Desert also gave us some insights, showing what kinds of romantic and interpersonal conflicts arose and how much stress they caused the participants.  Any place on Earth is paradise compared to the moon.

I’ve noticed a pattern in attitudes, with more religiously oriented folks gravitating toward statements about space colonization, and more secular types more likely to favor space exploration and science-based missions. Why is this? Does it have to do with different views of the very nature of humanity? Seeing ourselves as created beings must feel very different from seeing ourselves as animals that arose from our planet's materials.

Sadly, the reality of America’s current space program is reflected in this press release from the Planetary Society – an organization that supports both crewed and unscrewed missions:


The Obama administration's proposed 2013 NASA budget focuses almost all the agency's cuts onto the planetary science program that funds the robotic exploration of the solar system. NASA Planetary Science Division budget would be cut by 20% from $1.5 billion in 2012 to $1.2 billion in 2013. The proposed budget cuts will force the United States to give up its leadership in solar system exploration.

The robotic exploration program has delivered a golden age of planetary exploration including the Mars rovers; the Cassini mission to Saturn; MESSENGER, which is now orbiting Mercury; Dawn, orbiting the asteroid Vesta; and Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and GRAIL, which are orbiting our Moon exploring its structure and origins.

"If the NASA budget is passed in its current form, American leadership in planetary sciences will be endangered," said Dan Britt, Chair of Division for Planetary Sciences, American Astronomical Society. "We strongly believe that the robotic exploration of the solar system resonates with the American people, that it is something that NASA needs to be doing, and it is something the American people will support even in tight budget times."

Under the proposed budget NASA will be forced to cancel its plans for its most ambitious exploration missions, slash the Mars Exploration Program, and kill the Lunar Quest Program. The cuts will also end collaborations with the European Space Agency on the 2016 Mars Trace Gas Orbiter and the 2018 ExoMars rover, delay the economical Discovery and New Frontiers space programs, and force cuts in operations and data analysis for a number of current missions.

The planetary science community recently finished its latest decadal survey, Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science, under the auspices of the National Research Council. It recommends to NASA a program of balanced exploration and scientific analysis. Under the President's proposal, implementation of the balanced, consensus, budget-conservative plan outlined in the decadal survey will not be possible.

The American Astronomical Society's Division for Planetary Sciences, the world's largest professional association of planetary scientists, urges Congress to support and fund a vigorous and competitive planetary science program as recommended by the National Research Council.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Faye Flam - writer
In pursuit of her stories, writer Faye Flam has weathered storms in Greenland, gotten frost nip at the South Pole, and floated weightless aboard NASA’s zero-g plane. She has a degree in geophysics from the California Institute of Technology and started her writing career with the Economist. She later took on the particle physics and cosmology beat at Science Magazine before coming to the Inquirer in 1995. Her previous science column, “Carnal Knowledge,” ran from 2005 to 2008. Her new column and blog, Planet of the Apes, explores the topic of evolution and runs here and in the Inquirer’s health section each Monday. Email Faye at Reach Planet of the at

Planet of the Apes
Latest Health Videos
Also on
letter icon Newsletter