Friday, July 3, 2015

Were H. habilis and A. sediba Friends with Benefits? New Findings Complicate the Dawn of Humanity

new fossils from South Africa show a different possible story for humanity's origin.

Were H. habilis and A. sediba Friends with Benefits? New Findings Complicate the Dawn of Humanity


Perhaps resistance to evolution is just a widespread case of being embarrassed by our parents. In a series of papers released today, paleontologists made a case that humanity descended from a species called Australopithecus sediba – a South African hominid that lived close to 2 million years ago, had small brains, long, tree-climbing arms, and short stature. The males stood about 4’6” and the females were just around 3’0”.

But they had great hands with long, graceful looking fingers. “These were tool making hands,” said anthropologist John Hawks of the University of Wisconsin.

The papers, presented in the journal Science, give the most complete description of a set of a. Sediba fossils found in 2008, which include remains from five different individuals. Hawks was not an author of the paper but he’s been out to the site, and to him, the fossils emerging could finally help us piece together when and how we became human.

Generally, anthropologists consider humanity to include not just Homo sapiens, but other relatives within the larger grouping of homo - including our probably ancestor Homo erectus, as well as the earlier Homo habilis and several others. Three general criteria distinguish these species as human: tool use, large brains and large bodies.  

1.8 million year old Homo habilis has been considered the earliest species of human. To put that in perspective, humans branched off from chimps at around 7 million years, and the famous upright-walking small-brained hominid known as Lucy (Australopithecus afarensis) lived 3.2 million years ago. The first stone tools appear to be invented around 2.6 million years ago.

Between our split with chimps and the emergence of the first members of the homo club, however, our family tree gets rather bushy, with various types of Australopithecus living around Africa. What we’ve been missing, said Hawks, is one that shows a clear ancestral relationships to us.

These newer fossil creatures – Australopithecus sediba – could be those ancestors, but they had some strange features that don’t quite fit.  

Australopithecus sediba almost certainly had the tool use down, said Hawks. Tools were found around the site, and while it’s hard to prove a. Sediba made them, it seems likely, since these hominids had hands that would have been good with tools. And yet a. Sediba was nowhere near human in the size and brainpower departments. Homo habilis, whose name means handy man, ironically had less humanlike hands, though it was taller and its brain was one and a half times the size of the smartest Australopithecus. H.habilis remains are also clearly associated with stone tools.

According to the Science papers, A. sediba had a hodgepodge of other humanlike traits. The skull shape suggests that while the brain was small, it had become rearranged to a more humanlike structure, with more space devoted to the planning and judgment centers of the frontal cortex.

The ankle is humanlike and the heel is chimplike. The pelvis was also very humanlike, which is weird, said Hawks, because we thought our pelvis shape evolved to make it possible for women to give birth to babies with bigger brains, and yet the brain of a. Sediba is small.

So far, anthropologists are split over whether they think the ancestor to all humans is A. Sediba or homo habilis. Maybe it’s both – our search for a single common ancestor foiled by the sexual antics of a variety of species. It’s worth considering, said Hawks, since DNA evidence has shown anatomically modern humans mated with Neanderthals. Just last week new research was published showing evidence that early modern humans interbred with so-called archaic humans living in Africa.

This sort of thing happens. Other mammals can interbreed when separated by less than a million years of evolution, said Hawks, so in the same vein we may have inherited our hands from one species and our heads from another.



We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Faye Flam - writer
In pursuit of her stories, writer Faye Flam has weathered storms in Greenland, gotten frost nip at the South Pole, and floated weightless aboard NASA’s zero-g plane. She has a degree in geophysics from the California Institute of Technology and started her writing career with the Economist. She later took on the particle physics and cosmology beat at Science Magazine before coming to the Inquirer in 1995. Her previous science column, “Carnal Knowledge,” ran from 2005 to 2008. Her new column and blog, Planet of the Apes, explores the topic of evolution and runs here and in the Inquirer’s health section each Monday. Email Faye at Reach Planet of the at

Planet of the Apes
Latest Health Videos
Also on
letter icon Newsletter