On the website Why Evolution is True, University of Chicago biologist Jerry Coyne criticizes the New York Times for committing the day’s second worst science writing goof. He rightly takes the author of a story in today’s Science Times to task for stating that “Okapis are the only known relative of the giraffe…”
The writer must have meant the closest relative or the only close relative. According to evolution, we’re all relatives of the giraffe – even the reader who called me yesterday to inform me that while I may be related to a chimpanzee, he’s certainly not.
The Times writer might have been sloppy, or he might have committed a write-o. Mistakes of that sort are an occupational hazard for science writers because science stories tend to be packed with facts compared to most other newspaper fare. The more facts per story, the more risk for factual error. If a story says nothing it’s hard to get anything wrong.
Coyne wrote that he might be “nitpicking” to point out the okapi/giraffe error in an otherwise interesting story. It’s clearly not as egregious as a caption that ran earlier today proclaiming that an asteroid is about to “pass through Earth, moon.” If it's not corrected yet, you might still catch it here.