It can be hard for people who are not deeply religious to understand the mindset of creationists. I’ve gotten several letters from this reader, who explains why creationism is much more satisfying to her.
Hi Faye. This is my third letter to you. I read with interest your article, as I always do, and especially noted the many indefinites such as "what may be, may account for, origin is murkier, might have been, may have contributed, appeared by magic, may have triggered". I was also intrigued by "the invention of pregnancy". Then I went to my Bible and read, "So God created man in His own image, male and female created He them. And God said unto them, 'Be fruitful and multiply (invention of pregnancy!) and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and he fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth'." (Genesis 1:27,28) They were all created by God in the same time period. It's beyond my comprehension how people can stake their lives on maybes and might haves when this is so clearly presented. It has been suggested that many refuse to believe in a higher power because they would be accountable to Him if they believed in Him, which is true, but certainly a positive thing. I'm sure there are many reasons people can't accept this creation story, but there it is in black and white, straight from the mouth of God our Creator to us - no maybes, might have beens, or murkiness. Thanks for listening again
This aversion to uncertainty is so alien to the way I think that it makes me wonder whether religious orientation is a choice. Could it be that some of us are just wired to crave this kind of certainty, and to be satisfied by it, and others of us are wired to question and doubt?
Others apparently have contemplated the origin of religiosity and creationist thinking, as summed up in this commentary piece from The Los Angeles Times. I think this calls for further examination in a future Planet-of-The-Apes column.