Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Why is the Movie Ratings Board Stricter on Sex Than on Violence?

Critics of American movie ratings long have puzzled over the system that gives an R (under age 17 not admitted without parent or guardian) to a movie in which a woman is carved up by a chain saw and an NC-17 to one that shows a woman being sexually pleasured.

Why is the Movie Ratings Board Stricter on Sex Than on Violence?

0 comments
Michelle Williams and Ryan Gosling in "Blue Valentine," considered a blue movie by the Motion Picture Association of America.
Michelle Williams and Ryan Gosling in "Blue Valentine," considered a blue movie by the Motion Picture Association of America.

UPDATE: 40 minutes after I posted this, the Motion Picture Association overturned Blue Valentine's NC-17 designation and re-rated it R.

Critics of American movie ratings long have puzzled over the system that gives an R (under age 17 not admitted without parent or guardian) to a movie in which a woman is carved up by a chain saw and an NC-17 to one that shows a woman being sexually pleasured. 

From such ratings by the Motion Picture Association of America, one might conclude that sexual violence against women is OK for American teenagers to see, but that they must be 18 to see consensual, loving sex.

The most recent example of this peculiar standard is the MPAA's NC-17 rating of Blue Valentine, Derek Cianfrance's heartbreaking portrait of a foundering marriage starring Ryan Gosling and Michelle Williams, which shows a discreet scene (in medium-longshot) of Gosling pleasuring Williams while both are clothed.

As Steven Zeitchik notes in his excellent piece in the L.A. Times, what makes Valentine's rating even more baffling is that the recent (and comparably discreet) girl-on-girl scene of Mila Kunis pleasuring Natalie Portman in Black Swan received an R rating from the MPAA. One explanation for this disparity is that the MPAA, an industry group financed by and representing the major studios, tends to be more flexible with studio films (Black Swan is a Fox release) than it is with independent productions (Blue Valentine is distributed by The Weinstein Company).

Ralph Waldo Emerson warned that "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." Still, is foolish to hope that the board protecting American children from unsuitable content would be more consistent in its ratings? Your thoughts? Examples of the MPAA's most egregious ratings?

 

Film Critic
0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Consider our Movies blog your essential guide to new movies and classics, interviews with filmmakers and stars, news and views on the latest screen trends, reviews and the occasional rant.

Carrie Rickey Film Critic
Latest Videos:
Also on Philly.com:
letter icon Newsletter