Tuesday, August 4, 2015

California Supreme Court rejects Conrad Murray's latest appeal

California's Supreme Court has rejected an appeal to review the involuntary manslaughter conviction of Michael Jackson's former doctor Conrad Murray.

California Supreme Court rejects Conrad Murray's latest appeal

0 comments
FILE - In this Friday, Oct. 21, 2011, file photo, Michael Jackson´s former doctor Conrad Murray sits in a courtroom during his involuntary manslaughter trial in Los Angeles. Jurors hearing a civil case on Wednesday May 1,2013 against Jackson´s concert promoter that Murray was more than $500,000 in debt and his finances were ìseverely distressed.î (AP Photo/Reed Saxon, Pool, File)
FILE - In this Friday, Oct. 21, 2011, file photo, Michael Jackson's former doctor Conrad Murray sits in a courtroom during his involuntary manslaughter trial in Los Angeles. Jurors hearing a civil case on Wednesday May 1,2013 against Jackson's concert promoter that Murray was more than $500,000 in debt and his finances were ìseverely distressed.î (AP Photo/Reed Saxon, Pool, File) AP

California's Supreme Court has rejected an appeal to review the involuntary manslaughter conviction of Michael Jackson's former doctor Conrad Murray.

The physician spent nearly two years in jail on an involuntary manslaughter charge following Jackson's death from a lethal dose of the anesthetic propofol in 2009. Murray was released from prison last October, and earlier this year, a panel at a District Court of Appeal in California upheld his conviction and denied a petition asking for a rehearing of the case, prompting the doctor to take his claim to the state Supreme Court. However, on Wednesday, Murray hit another road block as the state's highest court declined the petition from his lawyer, Valerie Wass, in which she claimed, "The pervasiveness of modern digital media essentially made it impossible for a non-sequestered jury to have entirely avoided media coverage of the case." After Wednesday's decision, Wass insisted they will not give up, saying, "We're greatly disappointed but we intend to pursue this in federal court. The fight is not over."

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
If you've got an insatiable appetite for the latest and greatest celebrity fodder, we've got your fix! Our Celebrities & Gossip blog highlights breaking local and national celebrity news.

Gabrielle Bonghi Philly.com
Molly Eichel Inquirer Staff Writer
Nick Vadala Philly.com
Mare McKeever philly.com
Jenny DeHuff Daily News Staff Writer
Latest Videos:
Also on Philly.com:
letter icon Newsletter