Saturday, April 6, 2013
Saturday, April 6, 2013

Consumers still spending, but for how long?

Economics in a nutshell: At least so far, the increase in taxes has had minimal impact on household spending, showing that the economy retains a lot of momentum.

email

Consumers still spending, but for how long?

POSTED: Wednesday, March 13, 2013, 10:35 AM
Michael Riggio, owner of Michael Riggio Auto Sales in St. Louis, Missouri, wipes down a car for sale on his lot. (David Carson / St. Louis Post-Dispatch / MCT)

INDICATOR: February Retail Sales/Import and Export Prices

KEY DATA: Retail Sales: +1.1%; Excluding Vehicles: +1%/Import Prices: +1.1%; Non-Oil: 0%

IN A NUTSHELL: "At least so far, the increase in taxes has had minimal impact on household spending, showing that the economy retains a lot of momentum."

WHAT IT MEANS: Surprise, surprise, rising taxes don't slow economic growth. Well, maybe not so far. Consumers went out and spent lots of money in February led by a jump in vehicle purchases and gasoline sales. The rise in gasoline expenditures was more a result of a surge in prices than demand so that has to be backed out. But even if you remove vehicles and gasoline, a measure referred to as core-retail sales, there was still a solid increase in spending. However, the February report was not very even. While gasoline stations and vehicle dealerships did well, restaurants, sporting goods, furniture, appliance and department stores posted declines. We bought more clothing but the improvement in supermarket sales may have been driven by rising prices. Indeed, imported food costs jumped in February, adding to the consumer woes being created by the hike in energy costs. It looks like the housing recovery is beginning to have an impact on building supplies such as lumber. As for exporters, they seem to be pushing up the prices of all types of products as food, energy and most other prices of goods sold to the rest of the world increased.

MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Before any politician in Washington gets out of control and remarks that raising taxes leads to more spending, let's take a breather here. The jump in retail sales was really nice to see and with the January demand revised upward, it looks like first quarter growth will be stronger than most other economists have expected. Since everyone knows I have been and continue to be the outlier on growth, I am the logical one to crow. But I am worried. The retail sales increases were not broadly based. I need to see that happen before I think all is well with consumers. But more importantly, it is hard to think that the impact of the end of the payroll tax holiday will not ultimately cause many low and middle income households to moderate spending. At this point, they may be fighting to maintain their standard of living but how long that will last is unclear. I suspect that consumer spending will moderate but still be decent going forward: The jump in employment and income will allow that to happen. It is the strong consumer demand that we really need to turn the corner that is in question. Additionally, we will not see the full impacts of sequestration for months. All we can hope for is the economy building up enough momentum before all the impacts hit that we wind up with moderate rather than sluggish growth. Of course, if the dumb sequestration is ended, then my forecast of solid growth this year and strong growth next could come about. Investors are likely to love this number though how long a winning streak can be sustained is anyone's guess. As for the rise in import and export prices, that is a warning that an improving world economy could lead to some inflation pressures in the future. But it will take a lot stronger U.S. economy before we will have to worry about that happening.

Joel L. Naroff @ 10:35 AM  Permalink | 7 comments
email
Comments  (7)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:52 AM, 03/13/2013
    I don't think consumers are spending, at least no one I know is. Also, there are few jobs out there. I wonder why the reports lie about these things and believe that consumers are still ignorant enough to believe them?
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:14 AM, 03/13/2013
    Amazing the ignorance this newspaper has. First of all, auto sales are not impacted by Dodd Frank so the auto industry has recovered much faster than the rest of the Country.

    Second, the stock market is a bubble fueled by the Central Banks massive QE program. What happens when all that cheap money stops flowing into the markets especially now that US companies are make far less products and the US overall unemployment outlook is bleak?

    Anyone spending right now is a fool. Housing prices, stocks and autos are all in "bubble phase".
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:22 AM, 03/13/2013
    Professor you are beyond ignorant. Who wrote this piece? The newspaper? Look at the credentials - do they seem worthy? But yeah, don't pay attention to a credentialed writer, or aggregated data -- listen to Professor1982 everyone, plagarizer of Tyler Durden of ZeroHedge. I'll ask again: Professor, name the three mechanisms by which the Fed adjusts reserve levels, and impacts the overnight rate?
    Murrayman
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:44 AM, 03/13/2013
    prices are rising, except for things like restaurants (which we no longer can afford nice ones) that are at the margin, we have to spend more on basics because they cost more. to be honest, if taxes go up more, I'll have to look at longer term fixes like housing which is also rising faster than income.
    dreinterests
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:48 AM, 03/13/2013
    Actually, Prof1982 makes some good points. The fed IS dumping $85 Billion a month into the banks who are, in turn, speculating on stock equities. The DOW and S&P could very well be bubbles or at least over valued by 20% or so. We better HOPE that consumer spending remains strong, but that 2% tax increase did nothing to help. Mark Zandi, hardly a conservative, estimates that the payroll tax alone will reduce GDP by .6% which is nearly 25% of projected GDP growth for 2013 of 2.5%. Sequestration will drive down demand even more unless it is done judiciously - yeah right!
    Themonkofmagdalena
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:51 AM, 03/13/2013
    dreinterests nailed it too. The feds are trying to inflate us out of recession. Not sure WHO is putting out the inflation numbers, but they are playing games with the stats. Anyone who buys groceries KNOWS that prices are going up quickly - very quickly.
    Themonkofmagdalena
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:15 PM, 03/13/2013
    Okay, got it Themonk - only note rising prices when calculating inflation indeces. Look at the MIT Billion Price Index. That's -- a billion prices. More than your beloved "food and gas" index. Oh and another very astute observation -- banks have excess reserves, they are allowed by their own statutes to speculate with the excess reserves, so they speculate in equities, which is therefore driving the major indeces upward - got it. Roger that. Prof said its in 'bubble' territory. What's the historical avg. P/E of the S&P and how does it relate to the current, forward looking P/E?
    Murrayman


About this blog
Joel L. Naroff is the president and founder of Naroff Economic Advisors, a strategic economic consulting firm in Bucks County. He advises companies across the country on the risks and opportunities that economic developments may have on the organization’s operating environment. An accomplished public speaker, Joel’s humor and unique ability to make economics understandable have brought him a wide following. Reach Joel at joel@naroffeconomics.com .

Joel Naroff
Blog archives: