'Climategate' and the industry of denial
As expected, news out of Copenhagen has had to try to elbow its way through the manufactured fog of 'Climategate,' and that's not due to random coincidence. In fact, James Hoggan has chronicled how fossil-fueled PR campaigns deliberately "pollute" the public conversation on climate change.
'Climategate' and the industry of denial
Forget it.
Forget that we're about to complete the hottest decade ever recorded and that 2009 is likely to be the fifth-hottest year ever recorded.
Forget that the largest iceberg seen in a century is now heading for Australia*.
Forget that University of Pennsylvania scientists just reported a rise in sea level on our own coast.
Forget that fishermen have gone to Washington to warn of massive "scary" changes in the oceans' acidity that are destroying sea creatures.
Forget that so-called 'permanent' Arctic ice is disappearing, not expanding as previously believed.
Forget all these and turn your attention instead to the all-consuming issue of scientists' emails revealing that they're capable of petty, vindictive behavior toward other scientists and scientist-wannabes.
Because in the logic of the climate-change denialists, that one potential fact somehow negates everything just mentioned above - as well as the thousands of studies done by climate scientists worldwide that incontrovertibly underscore the exact same changes and trends. Yes, "hide the decline" trickster Phil Jones not only had a hand in faking all of those studies, but also apparently controls the air and the seas!
As expected, important news out of Copenhagen has had to try to elbow its way through the manufactured fog of 'Climategate,' and that's hardly due to random coincidence. In fact, James Hoggan has chronicled how fossil-fueled PR campaigns for most of the last two decades succeed in deliberately polluting the public conversation on climate change, pumping out willful disinformation that requires "debate" - a junk-science version of swiftboating.
A longtime veteran of the world of corporate PR, Hoggan is well-qualified to identify and catalog the media strategies used to keep the smoke thick - and keep regulation at bay. His book with Richard Littlemore, Climate Cover-Up: The Crusade to Deny Global Warming, came out this fall, before the perfectly-timed release of the stolen emails, but it documents how the climate-change-denial movement was turned into a viable industry by self-interest groups. Confusion has been persistently and intentionally sown in the public mind by well-organized efforts documented by Hoggan, efforts that mirror the current tempest in a teabag.
I talked to Hoggan, who has read al of them, about how the emails are being spun by a mob of bloggers and op-ed and how they've been fluffed up into "controversies." And of course he's not the least surprised by the stunt's timing, or by the speed with which the "revelations" in the emails spread. Here's the audio (MP3, 8 MB) of that conversation.
While the obvious goal of sabotaging Copenhagen may well be achieved, and has certainly already occurred in terms of mainstream press coverage, the facts continue to pile up day by day and, sadly, continue to bear out the scientific consensus. It's unquestionable that truth will prevail; the question is whether the public befuddlement so triumphantly wrought by the denial industry will last right up until it's too late.
UPDATE 12/14: An exhaustive review by The Associated Press finds that the contents of the stolen emails "don't support claims that the science of global warming was faked," in other words, there is "no evidence of falsification or fabrication of data." It's grimly humorous that the AP felt it necessary to do an exhaustive review, and even more so that this finding by objective journalists will mean nothing to the so-called skeptics. By their circular logic (to term it charitably), no journalist or scientist can be trusted, because they keep reporting the wrong facts. And the AP, in particular, is obviously part of the sinister global cabal (including almost every credentialed climate scientist on earth) that's trying to take away rich people's toys, since it was that selfsame journalistic organization that commissioned a blind study finding there was, in reality, no "decline" to "hide" after all.
* UPDATE 12/15: Helpful commenter "tr88" points us to this 2005 story from USA Today indicating that Popular Science misstated the Australian iceberg's relative size. A larger one was apparently seen in 1956, so this would only be the largest iceberg seen in half a century. Phew! Looks like everything's OK, then.
Comment removed.
It's not denial, it's called the scientific method. Stifling dissent does not correlate to consensus. You can fool all of the people some of the time, and some people all of the time...
Anybody remember the scientific "consensus" back in the 70's that we were heading for a new Ice Age? http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,944914,00.html- Comment removed.
Xi, awesome reference.. Quick question....roughly how many SUVs where on the road in 1817? None? That's odd. There had to have beeen SUVs! What else could possibly explain the climate change? Oh, it must have been coal fired power plants. What? None of them either? I'm stumped.— pjsz1261
The arrogance of this article is stunning. It's as if the writer(s) put their hands over their ears and started screaming LALALALALALALALALALALA in an attempt to keep the impure thoughts from entering into their ears. Forget that the scientific method DEPENDS on other scientists being able to reproduce the same experiments with the same data and get the same results. Because we need to take all this on "Faith", because the data has been discarded. BULL!!— rudytbone- A) it's not the biggest iceberg in a century and B), if it were, what would that prove? if a giant iceberg broke off a century ago, was man made global warming the cause back then? This is indicative of the alarmists claiming scientific "proof". They see something that has been happening forever and when it happens now a ha, global warming, didnt I tell you? Fools.— tr88
- A long time veteran of PR is well qualified to identify and catalog media strategies. And by the way, he is selling a book with the link attached. he might be well qualified to identify and catalog using the willing press to also help him sell a book it seems to me. I think he understands if you want to sell books, you get a lot better PR demonizing the skeptics.— tr88
- Wait a minute, I just looked outside and the sun is coming up. What more proof do you need that AGW is happening? Case closed.— tr88
- Nice job on researching that it's "the largest iceberg seen in a century is now heading for Australia". http://www.usatoday.com/weather/resources/coldscience/2005-01-20-1956-antarctic-iceberg_x.htm. If it's so easy to disprove things that you claim as proof, should it make people wonder what your real motives are and how weak your argument is?— tr88
The mere fact that people are now questioning the information the McScientists, and McJournalists have been spoon feeding us for the past decade has restored my faith in mankind.— CyaNutter- "Objective journalists" at the AP? Now there's an oxymoron for you. And by the way, just who are these "objective jounalists?" Do any of them have any formal training in any hard scientific discipline? Why on earth should I credit this AP review at all?— pj katauskas
- the question is simple: why does the left WANT to believe in global warming? what does it do for you?— bobbyd24
- Did Phil Jones, or Michael Mann write the above article? Main stream propaganda, err, I mean media, seems to have a death wish. How else can you explain the absurd things they parrot? "Who says the Emperor doesn't have new clothes?! He's got LOTs of new clothes; you just can't see them, because you aren't special like us!" Soon, main stream media will consist of fellow propagandists patting each other on the back for being the most green, or the most PC, etc. They won't even notice they have become irrelevant. But the advertisers will notice.— johnsmoothy
- And smoking isn't bad for us either. You numbskulls make my day.— lefty13153
The experts at Philadelphia's Energy Coordinating Agency answer your energy questions in our regular feature Stay Warm, Stay Green. Send in your question or questions to energy@phillynews.com.
Look for Jenice Armstrong to supply tips on green living as well as occasional columns on the subject of Green. She also blogs at Hey Jen.
Becky Batcha stays tuned for the here-and-now practical side of conservation, alternative energy, organic foods, etc. - stuff you can do at home now. Plus odds and ends.
Laurie Conrad recycles from her ever-growing e-mailbag to pass along the latest travel deals, fashion statements, household strategies, gadgets, cool local events and other nuggets of interest to those who appreciate a clean, green world.
Vance Lehmkuhl looks at topics like eco-conscious eating, public transportation and fuel-efficient driving from his perspective as a vegetarian, a daily SEPTA bus rider and a hybrid driver, as well as noting the occasional wacky trend or product. Contact Vance with your 'green' news.
Ronnie Polaneczky sees the green movement through the eyes of her 12-year-old daughter, who calls her on every scrap of paper or glass bottle that Ronnie neglects to toss into the house recycling bins. Ronnie will blog about new or unexpected ways to go green. She also blogs at So, What Happened Was...
Sandra Shea and the DN editorial board opine on any green-related legislation or policy. And we'll pass along some of the opeds on the subject that people send us.
Jonathan Takiff will be blogging mainly about consumer electronics - those things that we love to use and that suck too much energy. He'll spotlight green-conscious gizmos made in a responsible fashion, both in terms of materials used and the energy it takes to run them.
Signe Wilkinson draws the comic strip Family Tree, which follows the Tree family as they try to live green in the face of nattering neighbors, plastic-wrapped consumer products, and the primal teenage urge to spend vast quantities of money on hair care products of dubious organic quality.
In addition to these updates from our newsroom bloggers, watch for an occasional feature, Dumpster Diver Dispatches, from Philadelphia's original "green" community of artists, the Dumpster Divers. You'll learn about creative ways to reuse and recycle while you reduce, and about the artists who are making little masterpieces from what others throw out.
Sept. 17: A head start on cold season
Oct. 8: Help with fuel bills
Oct. 29: Last-minute ways to winterize
Nov. 19: Budgeting for the big bite
