Thursday, July 30, 2015

Hot-lanta

The standard set for last night was a victory. Sure, it would have been nice if the 76ers won by about 12-15 points. But, considering they lost to the Charlotte Bobcats in November by 10 points, considering the Bobcats beat the Celtics earlier this week, considering the Sixers can’t care how they win – only that they win – the goal was merely to go from 15-20 to 16-20. Done. 93-87, Sixers over Bobcats. The Sixers won this game with that 8-0 burst from about 7:40 to 5:30 in the third quarter. Until then, this game had the feel of that Indiana Pacers’ game on Dec. 20 – a game the Sixers lost. Whether this is legitimate improvement (I believe it is) or just a bad opponent (I disagree), the Sixers managed to win a game they would have lost earlier this season. I wish I thought it necessary to break down this game like some previous, but honestly, I don’t think it’s worth it. If I’m the Sixers, I quickly turn my attention to tomorrow’s game in Hot-lanta. Against the Hawks. This game, and the two after, is going to take more than just a smattering of focus, one quick burst, and then hold on until the end (that’s my assessment of last night). Let’s look at why. The Hawks are really good. And worse: They just got absolutely crushed by the Orlando Magic (if I weren’t on a flight to Atlanta right now, I’d check the score, but it was about a 35-point loss to the Magic). Forget catching Atlanta off-guard. Forget sneaking into Atlanta on a Sunday afternoon and pulling one out from under them. This would have been unlikely anyway. Now it’s impossible. If the Sixers are going to win, they are going to have to play exceptionally well. Think … last three quarters of the San Antonio game. It’s difficult in the NBA to predict how a team might play. Last night’s performance would be a 15-point loss in Atlanta, but over an 82-game season sometimes you need to exert just enough energy to win a game. That’s what the Sixers did. Forget the early-November loss to the Hawks (you know, the one where the Sixers blew that 20-something-point first-half lead and lost). That couldn’t be less relevant at this point. More later … --Kate

Hot-lanta

0 comments

The standard set for last night was a victory. Sure, it would have been nice if the 76ers won by about 12-15 points. But, considering they lost to the Charlotte Bobcats in November by 10 points, considering the Bobcats beat the Celtics earlier this week, considering the Sixers can’t care how they win – only that they win – the goal was merely to go from 15-20 to 16-20.
 
Done. 93-87, Sixers over Bobcats.
 
The Sixers won this game with that 8-0 burst from about 7:40 to 5:30 in the third quarter. Until then, this game had the feel of that Indiana Pacers’ game on Dec. 20 – a game the Sixers lost. Whether this is legitimate improvement (I believe it is) or just a bad opponent (I disagree), the Sixers managed to win a game they would have lost earlier this season. I wish I thought it necessary to break down this game like some previous, but honestly, I don’t think it’s worth it. If I’m the Sixers, I quickly turn my attention to tomorrow’s game in Hot-lanta. Against the Hawks.
 
This game, and the two after, is going to take more than just a smattering of focus, one quick burst, and then hold on until the end (that’s my assessment of last night).
 
Let’s look at why.
 
The Hawks are really good. And worse: They just got absolutely crushed by the Orlando Magic (if I weren’t on a flight to Atlanta right now, I’d check the score, but it was about a 35-point loss to the Magic). Forget catching Atlanta off-guard. Forget sneaking into Atlanta on a Sunday afternoon and pulling one out from under them. This would have been unlikely anyway. Now it’s impossible. If the Sixers are going to win, they are going to have to play exceptionally well. Think … last three quarters of the San Antonio game.
 
It’s difficult in the NBA to predict how a team might play. Last night’s performance would be a 15-point loss in Atlanta, but over an 82-game season sometimes you need to exert just enough energy to win a game. That’s what the Sixers did.
 
Forget the early-November loss to the Hawks (you know, the one where the Sixers blew that 20-something-point first-half lead and lost). That couldn’t be less relevant at this point. More later …
 
--Kate
0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Keith Pompey has been an Inquirer reporter since September 2004 and took over the Sixers beat in the summer of 2013 after covering Temple basketball and football for the previous three years.

Marc Narducci has served in a variety of roles with the Inquirer since beginning in 1983. He has covered the 76ers as a backup and a beat writer. In addition, Narducci has covered everything from the Super Bowl to the World Series and a lot in between.

Keith Pompey Inquirer Staff Writer
Marc Narducci Inquirer Staff Writer
Latest Videos:
Also on Philly.com:
letter icon Newsletter