A Golden State Letdown
News blogs, sports blogs, entertainment blogs, and more from Philly.com, The Philadelphia Inquirer and the Philadelphia Daily News.
A Golden State Letdown
The Golden State Warriors looked good tonight. They looked quick, fast, athletic. They shot 9 for 119 from the three-point line. The thing is, they're 25-44 on the season. So it's hard to tell if they looked good, or if the Sixers just played poorly. I think it was more of the latter than the former. The Sixers lost, 119-111.
Although the Warriors record is sub par, they play well at Oracle Arena, and have a much better record when guard Monta Ellis plays.
The Sixers shot 38.0 percent from the field. That's bad. They couldn't finish around the rim. The Warriors could, they shot 56.5 percent.
What's disappointing about this loss is the Los Angeles Lakers win. That game felt like they stole one. This game felt like they gave it back. They had a day off on Thursday, so it's tough to say they weren't rested. Obviously, one day of rest does not offer much, but in the NBA it seems to be about as much as you're going to get.
Still, the Sixers didn't just bag this one in the fourth quarter. It looked, when they got down, what was it -- 18 points? -- that it might stay right around there for the rest of the game. But the Sixers cut it to six with about 1:55 left in the game. That's closer than I think most of the soldout crowd in attendance, half of which had already left, thought this game would be. It was the missed three-pointer in the left corner from Lou Williams that seemed to be the best chance for the Sixers to get back into this game. That came with about 1:20 left and would have cut the game to three points.
The Sixers don't play tomorrow. They play the Sacramento Kings on Sunday, then the Portland Trailblazers on Monday. They -- or more specifically Andre Miller said -- wanted to win three games on this swing. That means they have to sweep these last two games.
As has been the tradition on this late, late, late-breaking Western swing, here's the final story with quotes from the Sixers.
Is Miller hurting or is he just getting out played? Williams gets 6 assets the first half and shoots well - second no assets and few points - San Fran adjustment or poor offensive decesions? If Sam makes some shots under the basket he gets 4-6 less rebounds. Why does Evans play against a small fast, team? What was wrong with IA? Just an off game? I still have hopes for 2 more wins for the trip! Go 76'ers! russ4philly
Thanks, Kate, for the multiple editions of your stories. What I saw in this game was simply atrocious defense. Dribble penetration leading to dunks, wide-open 3's by good shooters, open mid-range jumpers -- the Warriors got what they wanted against the Sixers' non-existent D. If the Sixers play D like that, they will also lose, even more dishearteningly, against the Kings, mark my words. Two quick comments on this game. First, how is it that the Warriors have 4 guys who shoot 40% or better from 3, all young swingmen, while the Sixers only have one old fossil who can do that? Second, Evans and Ivey are in such a bad rut right now that they need to be taken out of the regular rotation. Playing both together is brutal. It might be time to try Rush one more time, scary as that may sound, or even give Iguodala time at the 2 (they did that for a short while last night). Statman
Statman, maybe Tony D read your post. Rush was dusted off last night and played in the second quarter. The 25 pt. lead probably had a lot to do with that, but anything has to be better than the evans/ivy combo! zebra
zebra: Ha, I just wish Rush would play well against someone besides the Kings. Rush might have one of the most lopsided "one-team" stat lines of all time. Two games against the Kings: 87.5% FG, 80% 3-pt FG, 18 points. 21 games against everyone else: 28.2% FG, 24% 3-pt, 36 points total (1.7 ppg). Yes, he's scored a third of his points all season against one team. By the way, the Evans-Ivey combo was on the floor for the Kings' semi-scary 4th quarter run last night. Even with Lou and Speights also in the game and playing well, it's rough for the Sixers (who are offensively-challenged in the halfcourt as it is) to have to play 3-on-5 for any stretch of the game, let alone the 4th Q. Statman- As the season winds down, it becomes more and more obvious that Maurice Cheeks was a scapegoat for Ed Stefanski's poorly constructed roster. The Sixers have only slightly improved from the stumbling start they got while trying to adjust to Brand's presence. They might have made that same modest improvement under Cheeks, just as they did late last year. No team can survive in the NBA without at least two pure shooters in the regular rotation and the Sixers don't have anyone who can even hit free throws Neither DiLeo nor Cheeks can
The Golden State game was all about defense. Golden State got whatever they wanted. There really is no reason for this team to be so inconsistent on defense. That is one area that you should be able to be pretty consistent in. I personally think its the scheme plus having three atrocius guard defenders in Miller, Green, and Louis Williams. Those three couldn't guard me. brannigan73



John Mitchell is in his second year covering the 76ers for the Inquirer after joining the paper in November 2011. He covered the Washington Wizards for the Washington Times from 1998 to 2008. He's also worked at the Philadelphia Tribune, the Wilmington News Journal, Courier-Post, Trenton Times and Elmira Star-Gazette.
Marc Narducci has served in a variety of roles with the Inquirer since beginning in 1983. He has covered the 76ers as a backup and a beat writer. In addition, Narducci has covered everything from the Super Bowl to the World Series and a lot in between. Narducci also has a true passion for South Jersey scholastic sports, which he has covered for many years.