Archive: December, 2008

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Playing a "full 48" is my new favorite euphemism. Essentially, it's code for "we lost."

Right?

We've heard it all season from the 76ers. It's showed itself in various forms. Here are some of the other ways: "We need to be more consistent." Or "We have to put together four good quarters." Or "We're searching for a flow." Or "We have to stay focused all game." Or "We let our intensity down for a little bit."

All of these are code for the same thing: "We lost." After five games, 10 games, 15 game even, these are phrases that can be swallowed. But right now, 30 games into this season, the question that follows, "We let our intensity down for a little bit," should be, "Why?" The question that follows "We need to put together 48 minutes of good basketball," should be, "How come it hasn't happened?"

The Sixers lost again tonight, this time 112-95 to the Utah Jazz at a sold-out Energy Solutions Arena. If you watched the game, you probably noticed that, like the New Kids On The Block, the Sixers were 'hangin' tough' through the first 20 minutes. Just like that Boston Celtics game a week ago, where they were tied 37-37 in the second quarter, the Sixers were leading 39-38 tonight. Then here's what happened: Dalembert Turnover, Iguodala miss, Dalembert miss, Miller Miss, Dalembert rebound, Dalembert miss, Dalembert rebound, Dalembert turnover, 20 second timeout by the Sixers. 48-39 Jazz lead.

Game. Over.

Here's what Sixers coach Tony DiLeo said about this stretch:

"I thought we played a good, competitive game for the first 22 minutes. What costs us sometimes is we have these little phases where we let teams pull away and the last two minutes of the first half was a situation where we didn't close out the half. It's happened in some of the other games in the past and we have to eliminate that."

How can the Sixers eliminate that? I'm not sure at this point. I'm fresh out of ideas. Start Speights? Start Lou Williams? All of these ideas are just spinning the wheel and hoping it lands on something productive.

After the game, DiLeo said: "Utah is a better executing team than we are."

Sure, that's understandable. Nobody in Philadelphia is expecting these Sixers to be the offensive gurus that the Jazz have been under head coach Jerry Sloan. But the problem lately is that the Sixers have been doing the things they said they needed to do to win. They are scoring in transition (25 tonight), shooting well from the floor (48.7 percent), scoring off of turnovers (20 points tonight), and yet, losing by 17? It would be one thing if this were a five-point game. But it wasn't. The Sixers were down by 20 at one point.

Here's a glaring statistic: The Sixers have given up 23 three-pointers in the last two games (15 to the Denver Nuggets, eight tonight). Open outside shooters has been a thorn in the Sixers' side since last season. What makes it even tougher is the Sixers own outside-shooting woes ... well documented, of course. Especially when former Sixer Kyle Korver scores 12 points and hits two three-pointers tonight. The Sixers were 1 for 9 from beyond the arc.

But it's not just the misses. It's the timing of those misses. The one that stands out tonight was an Iguodala three-point attempt from the right corner that would have cut the game to three early in the third quarter. Iguodala missed, Jazz scored, and the game was never as close. These are crucial, killer, back-breaking misses. And the Sixers seem to always miss these shots.

The Sixers now fly to Los Angeles for Wednesday game against the Clippers. The Clippers are 8-21. The Sixers are 12-18, losers of four straight ...

--Kate

p.s. We're going to try to do a Live Chat tomorrow (Tuesday) if my flight to Los Angeles is on time. Oh, and the photos. Photo 1: Downtown Salt Lake City. Photo 2: Energy Solutions Arena after all the Jazz fans went home victorious.

 

Posted by Kate Fagan @ 12:47 AM  Permalink | 5 comments
Monday, December 29, 2008
We’re in the middle of the challenging five-game, West Coast swing that we’ve talked about for a few weeks. Before the 76ers left Philadelphia, on paper, there looked to be one win in these five games: against the Los Angeles Clippers.
 
On Friday, because of the absence of Carmelo Anthony and poor play by the Denver Nuggets, the Sixers looked to have a surprising win. But, even with that 17-point lead in the third quarter, anyone who has watched this team this year knew it would be a one-possession game down the stretch. And it was. And, because of the superior crunch-time play of Chauncey Billups, the Nuggets won a game they shouldn’t have won. The Sixers lost a game they shouldn’t have lost. This, unfortunately, is becoming familiar.
 
Let’s take a few minutes to evaluate what happened against the Nuggets before looking forward to tonight’s game against the Utah Jazz.
 
1.) Andre Iguodala. He played well (24 points, four rebounds, four assists … four turnovers). But it will be the last of those four turnovers that people will remember and harp upon. Mostly because we’ve seen this last-second play from Iguodala before. In the Sixers last home game, against the Pacers, Iguodala had the ball on a clear-out play at the end of the game. Against the Pacers, he got into the lane and missed a difficult left-handed shot. Against the Nuggets, Iguodala got into the lane, dragged his pivot foot, and was called for a travel. It’s interesting: Even when Iguodala plays a strong game, as he did against the Nuggets, he just can’t tie it together on that final play. Here are my thoughts: I don’t think Iguodala should have the ball on that play. I think Lou Williams should have the ball. Why? That’s Williams’ game. We saw it on the previous play when he broke down his defender, got into the lane, and made that nice loft pass to Marreese Speights, who made a basket for the go-ahead points.
 
I say all the time that Iguodala makes this team run, but that does not always mean he is best suited to make that final play. Those situations are Williams’ forte.
 
2.) More Lou, More Speights: They are playing very well right now. Lou and Speights are the off-the-bench firepower that have allowed the Sixers to be in a few games lately they might not have been. I like how Lou is being aggressive, yet passing the ball when necessary. What we saw at the beginning of the year was over-aggressiveness, an inability to finish his shots, and a lack of making those around him better. It’s hard to not be frustrated by losses to the Pacers, then Celtics, then Nuggets (two of which should have been victories), but Williams’ play (sort-of) eases that frustration.
 
Also on the plus side, Speights has the best player efficiency rating (PER) of all rookies. Yup, better than O.J. Mayo, Kevin Love, Derrick Rose, Greg Oden. Right now Speights plays about 14-16 minutes a game. I think we all know he needs to be on the court even more.
 
3.) Three-point defense; Free-throw shooting: It’s always something, right? Finally the Sixers shot decent from the three-point line (5 for 12) from the floor (49.4 percent) ran in transition (18 fast-break points) and created turnovers (22 for the Nuggets). And yet they lost? This is exactly the formula the Sixers having been saying would be victorious: trapping defense, running in transition. But then they miss crucial free throws. Speights’ miss on the three-point play was tough. Iguodala missed three. Lou missed four. It almost feels – okay, it does feel – like they don’t know how to win. Giving up 15 three-pointers? At some point you have to say to yourself: Okay, they’re not beating us with another trey. But those mental changes weren’t made. And that’s frustrating to watch.
 
4.) Tony DiLeo: I can’t disagree with much from DiLeo. His rotations have made sense. His in-game coaching has made sense. Aside from giving the ball to Williams for one crucial possession against the Nuggets (good decision), then taking it out of his hands and giving it to Iguodala for the next crucial possession (questionable), his coaching has given the Sixers every possible chance to win games.
 
I know that Nuggets game was the 26th, but it still needed to be discussed. It seemed this road trip was on pause in Colorado, as the Sixers stayed in Denver for two days to practice before heading to Utah.
 
Which brings us to tonight’s game against the Jazz. Again, the Sixers will be the beneficiaries of injuries. Yes, they have their own (Elton Brand’s shoulder), but the Jazz are facing a slew of injuries: Carlos Boozer is still out. His replacement, Paul Millsap, who has been playing well in his absence, sprained his PCL and will miss seven to 10 days. Second-leading scorer Mehmet Okur has missed Utah’s last two games with back spasm. This is a depleted Utah front line.
 
I would anticipate the same Sixers starting lineup that DiLeo went with against the Nuggets: Andre Miller, Willie Green, Iguodala, Thaddeus Young, and Samuel Dalembert.
 
This game is important. I’d be crazy to say it’s more important than any other game (because they’re all worth either one win or one loss, right?), but let’s really look at what’s at stake.
 
If the Sixers lose this game, drop to 12-18 – having dropped two games to injured teams – come back from this road trip at 13-20 (assuming wins over the Clippers, losses to the Mavericks and Spurs), then try to re-incorporate Brand into the rotation upon return, things are going to continue to be disjointed. That record – 13-20 – looks daunting.
 
If they can win this game, catch a little momentum; maybe knock off the Mavericks after the Clippers, return 15-18, that seems more respectable. 15-18? That’s almost like knocking on the door of .500 … which is still where I feel this team should be.
 
A win in Utah is manageable. Here are the keys, in my opinion.
 
1.) Samuel Dalembert. He needs to have a double-double. If he has a double-double, I believe the Sixers will win this game. He needs to play smarter. How many times can you foul somebody then look incredulously at the referees? He can’t give DiLeo a reason to put him on the bench. It seems the Sixers’ staff is already looking for a reason to take him off the floor. With the Jazz missing key front-line players, there is no reason Dalembert shouldn’t dominate. He should dominate (and for Dalembert, “dominating” would be a double-double).
 
2.) Andre Miller. Distribute the basketball in transition. Against the Nuggets, Miller hit two very important baskets in the last three or four minutes.
 
(Let’s not even discuss that absurd – in my belief – technical foul called on Miller at the end of the Nuggets’ game. What Miller did, stand in front of the free-throw shooter to slightly delay the shots, is done all the time. The problem that I see is that call was the result of an entire game of talking to the referees. Not just by Miller, but by a lot of the Sixers. Sometimes being in the referee’s ear all game grates on him. Miller said as much after the game. He said the referee wouldn’t really give him an explanation, but was probably fed up with how much the Sixers had talked to him all game. I think it would be a step in the right direction for the Sixers to stop talking about the refereeing and focus on defending the three-point shot and making their free throws. Okay, back to Miller …)
 
He’s returning to Utah – the site of his college glory – and I think if he has 8-plus assists that will mean Iguodala is scoring, Willie Green is scoring, and Thad Young is scoring.
 
Overall thoughts: The Sixers have played more exciting, better basketball the last two games. They looked good for about two quarters against the Celtics (it was 37-37 in the second quarter), and they looked strong against the Nuggets for much of that game. It’s too late in the season to take another step backward. They cannot allow Utah to run them off the court tonight. The season is more than a third over. The excuses for “getting better” and “a work in progress” no longer fly. Utah is missing key players. The Sixers, I believe, should win this game.
 
Bold statement, I know.
 
--Kate
 
 
 
 
Posted by Kate Fagan @ 3:22 PM  Permalink | 14 comments
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
Boston Celtics guard Rajon Rondo (9) drives on Philadelphia 76ers guard Andre Iguodala as Boston Celtics center Kendrick Perkins (43) and Philadelphia 76ers forward Thaddeus Young, far left, look on during the first quarter of their NBA basketball game in Boston Tuesday, Dec. 23, 2008. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)
After last night's 110-91 loss to the Boston Celtics, Andre Iguodala sat in front of his locker. He had ice wrapped on his knees. And he did not seem happy with the "trash-talking" of the opponent he just played. Iguodala said these Celtics were known around the league for their smack talk.
 
"It takes away from how good of a team they are. It takes away from their respect factor. Teams won't respect them as much."
 
Iguodala also said the Celtics were lacking in the intimidation department.
 
"I think they're a good team, but they don't have the intimidation factor of those Detroit teams."
(I think he was referring to the early-2000 Detroit teams, not the ones with Rodman, Isiah, et all ...)
 
Of last night's loss, Iguodala said: "We were doing the right things, we just couldn't get a break."
 
I believe on this day, the day before Christmas, we should let those words stand on their own.
 
--Kate
Posted by Kate Fagan @ 10:15 AM  Permalink | 11 comments
Tuesday, December 23, 2008

It's a few minutes before tip off here at the Boston Garden (I still call it such). Here's the news:

1.) Kareem Rush will start at shooting guard instead of Willie Green, who isn't playing tonight because of the sore ankle he aggravated Saturday against the Pacers. Head coach Tony DiLeo said he is going with Rush because he wants to continue to bring Lou Williams off the bench as a spark. DiLeo said Rush played the two-spot yesterday at practice and they decided to go with that same lineup. I spoke with both Rush and DiLeo. Rush didn't know he was starting. But he said he'll approach it as an opportunity. Rush has kept his shot in shape all season, always shooting extra after practice. DiLeo said it would, obviously, be a great boast to this squad tonight if Rush could come in and spread the floor and knock down a few three-pointers. And if that's not the case, DiLeo said they would go with Plan B (which I would guess would be Lou Williams at times, and then also Marreese Speights at the power forward and Iguodala at the shooting guard).

Also, Theo Ratliff is out with the flu.

2.) Traffic in Boston is unbelievable tonight. The Sixers had two buses coming to the arena. The first one took 55 minutes to get here (it took 10-15 this morning for shootaround). The second bus didn't arrive until 6:45. Let's say they were a little stressed. Probably not the best way to start a game against the NBA's best team. But, since I witnessed the madness that was this evening's traffic, I can attest that it was unavoidable.

Back to Rush. He took a cab to the arena with Royal Ivey and at least one other player. They beat the traffic and were working on their jumpshots well before the first bus arrived.

15 minutes until this game ...

--Kate

Posted by Kate Fagan @ 7:24 PM  Permalink | 1 comment
Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Posted by Kate Fagan @ 4:19 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
Tuesday, December 23, 2008

We'll be chatting this afternoon at 3:30 p.m. if anyone has some time. Seems like a good time to discuss the past, present, and future .... just like a Christmas Carol.

Past: That Pacers game. This one is still painful to think about. It would be much more pleasant for the Sixers to be 13-14 right now, rather than 12-15.

Present: This Celtics game. Celtics are the best team in the NBA, yet again. 18-game winning streak. 26-2 record. 16-1 at home. If you want to read about the records they could break tonight with a victory, click here: Celtics story.

Future: This 2008-09 season, and what it might hold for the 76ers. On the immediate horizon is this 6-game road trip, which occurs mostly on the West Coast, but begins tonight in Boston. It's a daunting trip. Realistically, the Sixers will return with, at most, two, outside chance of three, wins. And after that, you have to look at the return of Elton Brand and wonder how much longer it will take the Sixers to re-work him back into the schemes. This team, like Brand's shoulder, is facing a disjointed time.

If you have a minute, click here: Sixers Chat.

--Kate

 

Posted by Kate Fagan @ 11:30 AM  Permalink | 5 comments
Friday, December 19, 2008

At this point, you almost want to take a win like this, put it in your pocket, and just walk away. Afterall, the Washington Wizards are 4-20. Take the win, bump the record to 12-14, and look ahead to tomorrow night's game against the Indiana Pacers and then the grueling start of a West Coast swing that begins before Christmas against the Celtics. (I recognize this isn't the start of the swing, but, mentally, it's the beginning of it ...)

But what came from tonight's 109-103 win in Washington D.C.? A lot of the usual, some of the ususual. Let's look at both. First, the usual.

1.) Andre Iguodala. Tonight's game is similar to how he's played all season. Starts off shooting 3 for 3, then goes 1 for 6. He can't keep that shot consistent over 48 minutes, but he finishes with 18 points, nine rebounds, and four assists. I think if any player represented the Sixers overall effort tonight, it was Iguodala: He scrapped together 18 points on four field goals and nine free throws. He took a couple of bad shots, but mostly just ran around the court trying to get a win.

2.) Samuel Dalembert. It's hard to explain, at this point, why Sammy's sitting on the bench. You can't say it's because there aren't enough minutes. Heck, Elton Brand's 35 minutes are floating about. I know he picked up two quick fouls, but 11 minutes, 53 seconds for the starting center? He only finished with three fouls. That's not what kept him off the floor in the second half.

3.) Marreese Speights. I know, you might be thinking, it's USUAL for Speights to score 17 points? No, technically that's not usual (it is his career-high afterall). But I put forth that this is what Speights would do every night, if he played 20-plus minutes every night. I don't think we saw anything unusual from Speights, except that he got enough minutes to do his thing.

Now, for what's ususual.

1.) Lou Williams. I don't think it's unusual for Lou Williams to be a factor off the bench, I think it's unusual for Williams to carry the Sixers from off the bench. 26 points? Career high. Fadeaway three-pointer from the corner? Check. Nice dishes to Speights in transition? Check. Four three-pointers? Check. Without Lou tonight, the Sixers don't win this game.

2.) Kareem Rush. Before the game new head coach Tony DiLeo said the only thing keeping Rush from contributing was an opportunity. And DiLeo promised to find Rush an opportunity. Rush hit two 3-pointers tonight and finished 2 for 3. One of his treys, as DiLeo mentioned post game, pushed the Sixers to within four points in the second half. It was an important three. Now, I did notice that defensively Rush didn't exactly put the clamps on his defender, but these things happen when you haven't gotten any run lately. Rush's productivity leads to unusual point numero three ...

3.) 9 for 21 from beyond the arc. I refuse to say anything more about this than one word: unusual.

What the Sixers did tonight was patch together a win against a not-very-good NBA team. That's what happened. And that's what they need to do, as often as they can, over the next month while Elton Brand is rehabilitating his right shoulder. There are people who believe this team is better without Brand, but, as columnist Bob Ford wrote yesterday, that is merely a sugar high. It's fun to watch this run-and-gun style, but they do need Brand as a solid half-court option.

--Kate

p.s. The photo is of the cavernous Verizon Center, located in downtown Washington D.C. at the corners of F and 6th Streets.

Posted by Kate Fagan @ 11:27 PM  Permalink | 9 comments
Thursday, December 18, 2008

Elton Brand received an MRI after last night's game that revealed a fracture of the humeral head (bone) and a tear of the labrum, the Sixers announced in a press release. Sixers team doc Jack McPhilemy said he doesn't think the injury requires surgery at this time.

The Sixers said Brand will begin rehab immediately and is expected to be out a month. He will not travel with the team this afternoon to Washington, where the Sixers play the Wizards tomorrow night.

In the third quarter of last night's win over the Milwaukee Bucks, Brand left the game clutching his right shoulder. The news coming from the Sixers last night was a "Dislocated Right Shoulder."

Brand was not made available to the media at today's practice at the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine. Sixers officials said the first opportunity to speak with Brand will come before Saturday's home game against the Indiana Pacers.

The Sixers watched film for about 30 minutes today and then got on the court to shoot around before taking an afternoon train to Washington.

The injury to Brand tosses another wrench into what has been a whirlwind first two months of the season. Of course, on Saturday, President and General Manager Ed Stefanski fired coach Maurice Cheek after the Sixers started 9-14. New coach, Tony DiLeo, has said he was working on tweaking the offensive and defensive sets to better improve the Sixers efficiency. He said before last night's game that he believed this team had the pieces to win.

The injury to Brand comes at an odd time as we've been speaking recently about whether Brand's addition had slowed what was last year an uptempo squad. When Brand left the game last night, the Sixers trailed by seven points. They won by five points. But the consensus among the Sixers players is that Brand is an essential piece for long-term success. The Sixers might seem more effective in the short-term reverting to their run-and-gun style, but they need a reliable half-court player to win the tough games.

--Kate

 

Posted by Kate Fagan @ 12:43 PM  Permalink | 20 comments
Wednesday, December 17, 2008

It happened again: The 76ers looked better without Elton Brand on the court. But this time, the injury to Brand looks like it might keep him out of lineup for a significant amount of time. With 7 minutes, 23 second left in the third quarter, Brand took a hit from Bucks forward Luc Mbah a Moute, both went to the floor. Brand popped up quickly, as if nothing was wrong. He immediately walked off the floor, clutching his right shoulder. The word from the Sixers is that Brand dislocated his right shoulder. He was not available after the game as he was off-site getting an MRI to determine the damage.

His teammates sitting on the bench said Brand's shoulder was out-of-joint as he walked past.

When Brand left, he had four points and six rebounds. The Sixers trailed by seven points. Eventually, the Sixers (11-14) defeated the Milwaukee Bucks (11-16), 93-88. It was the second game since Sixers President and General Manager Ed Stefanski fired coach Maurice Cheeks and replaced him with Tony DiLeo. DiLeo is now 2-0, as the Sixers defeated the Washington Wizards in his debut.

Before last night's game, DiLeo was asked if he thought fans should expected a change in play within a few games. DiLeo said, "A major complete difference in how we play in three games? I don't think so." And, through two-and-a-half quarters, DiLeo was right. There were slight improvements: a good-looking trap in the backcourt, a possession with solid ball movement, better spacing for Brand down low. But the results were familiar: Trailing a not-very-good basketball team by double-digits on their home floor.

(Let's be clear, Brand is a very good basketball player. I don't, at all, believe he shouldn't be on the court when he's healthy. He plays hard. He scores points and grabs rebounds. But we have to discuss if the Sixers -- given the rest of their roster -- can play more effectively without him on the court. It's my belief that we're seeing these results without Brand because they had 82 games last season with the old roster, and only 22 (Brand missed two games with that strained hamstring ... and yes I'm aware this a parenthetical clause within parenthesis) with Brand. Obviously, they can easily revert to the style that worked for them last season. But here's the main thing: Yes, they made the playoffs with that style, but could they ever be more than that with just those pieces? What they have now, perhaps, when they can finally have both -- fast break and a halfcourt threat -- is a playoff team that can go past the first round. This is all just speculation, but these are the questions that need to be pondered. Yesterday in practice Brand had a great quote when asked why the Sixers might have messed with the chemistry of a playoff team. He said, "It's not as if they won the championship last season." That's true. But then one wonders if the cure can only be more time, more games, more practices with Brand and the rest of the roster. And if that was the case, why was Cheeks fired? When it's just going to take more time, more games for the next coach? I digress ...)

But all we have to look at is tonight. The Sixers went from down 10 to a five-point win. How did they do it? By playing like they played last season. Reggie Evans hunted down rebounds. Lou Williams (25 points) sliced to the rim, made outside shots, and just generally carried the fourth-quarter scoring. Andre Miller was his steady self. Thaddeus Young collected the scraps for 10 points and four rebounds. Rookie Marreese Speights had 12 points and a number of dunks off rebounds. And, while I know I'll get the standard "Trade Iguodala, He's Overpaid" comments, Iguodala still had seven assists and six rebounds. Yes, he shot 2 for 14. Or, as someone pointed out to me, he made all but 12 of the shots he took. Doesn't matter. He was on the court when the Sixers got their win on.

Let the discussion begin ...

--Kate

Posted by Kate Fagan @ 11:31 PM  Permalink | 13 comments
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Fired Sixers coach Marice Cheeks exits the Hall of Fame Room at the Wachovia Center after today's news conference. (Ed Hille / Staff Photographer)

(We'll hold a Live Chat this afternoon at 3:30 p.m. if you want to talk more in-depth about this week's happenings and today's press conference with Mo Cheeks. Click here for the link.)

If you were unsure before today about the character of Maurice Cheeks (which is doubtful considering his history), he showed it (again).

On Monday, the 76ers announced a press conference with Cheeks for this morning at 10:30 a.m. at the Wachovia Center. It hasn't been the easiest three months for Cheeks. His team had struggled to 9-14, and there were questions about whether he was the right man to guide this revamped squad. And then, Saturday, as we all know, he was fired.

But it was interesting to hear what he would say. Would he allude to not being given enough time to mesh the off-season additions? Would he speak of the shift in identity with Elton Brand, yet the continued mantra that this should be a running team? Would he say the task he was given was impossible?

I think we all know the answers to those questions. Of course he wouldn't. He's all class, all the time.

Here's what he did say:

"First of all, now I have a little bit more time for The Sports Club ..." -- typical Cheeks to make a joke to ease a tough situation. He later said, while laughing, that sometimes you have to laugh instead of cry. So true.

Cheeks started by thanking the organization, Ed Stefanski, and the city for the opportunity to be the head coach in the city in which he started his playing career. Many times throughout the morning he said this was his city, he loved this city, and he would be open to working with the Sixers in a different capacity. Although he said no one has approached him yet on the topic. Stefanski did say on Saturday that he would talk to Mo about this after the Holidays.

Cheeks said, "This is a tough situation for me, but it's part of the business. If you're not winning games, things happen. I can't express my appreciation as much as I'd like. No one understands the feelings inside when you get fired." (In such a public forum.)

"I used to say when we had a bad game, 'It's a moment, and it will pass.' Well this is a moment. I take solace in the fact I did the best I could. This is not about pointing fingers. I'm not even going to go into the X's and O's part of it. I'm not going to go into the blame game. No one that gets fired can come up here and say, 'Look' no one feels good about it. I would assume the Sixer organization doesn't feel good about it."

Even though Cheeks made it clear he didn't want to talk about the on-court part of the decision, the questions kept coming, "Did they expect you to be a running team but didn't give you the pieces to actually be a running team?"

"Whether we could run, didn't run, I'm not getting into it ... There's a lot of things in this life that are just not fair, there's no point for me to discuss those things. My job is to go out and win games whether they hired 10 new players or 1 new player ... We went out everyday and tried."

"What we were going to do is what we tried to do. We were going to run. We didn't do it as well as we would have liked."

"I thought we were going to run. It's not going to benefit anyone to say, 'We couldn't run, we couldn't rebound,' It does me no good to say those things."

"Anytime you get let go it hurts, not being able to finish ... finish what we started. I really thought we had an opportunity to win."

"It does come down to having certain players who can do certain things. But it also comes down to the coach getting the certain players to do certain things."

Added Cheeks: "I had some quality players and character-wise, I don't think I can get much better."

Cheeks talked a little bit about last season's playoff run and how, possibly, that success led to this day. Meaning that he raised expectations.

"We won more games ... for whatever reason. We had a cohesion. And the cohesion we had at that times was pretty special." Then Cheeks said that if he hadn't had that run at the end of last season, he probably would have said goodbye much sooner.

When did he know he would be fired?

"You just know things are not going the way you want them to. Having been around this business for 30 years, you know how things go ... There were games for us that could have turned it a different way."

Games Cheeks mentioned: The second half against Chicago. The Rashard Lewis 3-pointer in the Orlando Magic game at home. The lifeless loss at the Charlotte Bobcats.

Cheeks said after he was fired he received many nice phone calls, texts, emails, letters, etc., which was hard for him. He said what was especially hard was hearing from his players.

"I was pushing myself away as much as possible, then getting those texts was difficult for me."

Cheeks said you can say to yourself all the time, "If I had a shooter ... If I had this rebounder ..." but that he "tried to do with what he had, the best he could."

Cheeks said he felt it was a healthy thing for him to step away for a little bit. He said before the press conference was set, he was heading to Miami, and that now he will head to Miami to "get some sun on his face and re-energize and figure out the best next step." He said he doesn't know if he will coach again.

Why did Cheeks halt his plans to Miami to have this press conference?

"I think it would have been a little selfish for me to pick up and leave ... as a head coach there's so many people that support you and you don't often have a chance to say 'thank you.'"

Did Philadelphia see a different side of Cheeks, as a coach?

"They saw a different side of me ... I haven't changed. I got a little older, a little wiser."

Cheeks said he was 21 when he first came to Philly, and he is 52 now. (Cheeks said he preferred playing to coaching ... not sure anyone can blame him.)

"A lot has gone on in my life since I first came here."

Can this team be a playoff team?

"I think it's a good basketball team. They have good young players and if they keep going they have a chance."

Can he pinpoint what happened this season?

"Expectations started to mount. I kept trying to find ways to do this and do that ... I kept trying to pull and pull and pull and nothing was coming. Then you know it's time."

--Kate

 

Posted by Kate Fagan @ 12:08 PM  Permalink | 51 comments
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3
About Deep Sixer Blog
Kate Fagan was, until recently, the all-time leading three-pointer shooter in the University of Colorado women’s basketball program. Her former teammates say that’s because she was also the all-time leading three-point taker in program history. Somewhere along the way, journalism became her passion, and there are those who say that she still likes taking her shots. This is her second season as the 76ers beat writer for The Inquirer. She brings a rare combination of first-hand basketball insight, writing ability and an attitude that fits perfectly in her new hometown.
Deep Sixer Videos