Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Archive: February, 2009

POSTED: Saturday, February 7, 2009, 6:45 PM

I found this interesting after talking to Thaddeus Young before tonight's game against the Miami Heat. We all remember how hot Young was at the start of this season -- he even said tonight that he "came out on fire at the beginning of the season." No argument here. Through five games, Young was shooting 56.0 percent from the field and 55.6 percent from the three-point line. He was averaging 16.0 points.

Gradually, those numbers have crept lower. Now, through 48 games, he is shooting 47.6 percent from the field and 33.3 percent from the three-point line. He is averaging 13.5 points a game.
 
Young said that, lately, he's been watching a lot of game tape of his outside shot. He said he noticed the following about his percentages: 
 
1.) When he catches the ball stationary, holds it, then decides he's open for the shot, his percentage plummets.
 
2.) When he catches the ball in motion, uses a 1-2 pivot (which would be planting his inside foot first, then swinging around and planting his outside foot. Or, if he's catching with a step towards the rim -- not towards the ball -- it would be planting one foot, then the other), then shoots, he makes it about half the time.
 
3.) When he catches the ball in motion, and uses a jumpstop (both feet land at the same time -- yeah, I know that's self-explanatory), his shooting percentage is at his highest.
 
This is interesting, because it's a good thing to keep an eye on when Young shoots the ball. At the beginning of the season, he looked like he would be a deadly threat from outside. He still contributes -- 38 made on the season -- but 33.0 percent isn't lighting the world on fire. Still, now that he has watched and deduced the aforementioned about his in-shot footwork, it might help his outside percentage (We know he don't need no help on that lefty floater).
 
--Kate
 
Kate Fagan @ 6:45 PM  Permalink | 6 comments
POSTED: Friday, February 6, 2009, 3:02 PM
More Speightyman, please.
Yesterday was about Elton Brand. It was about dealing with the news of his season-ending surgery. It was about getting onto the Wachovia Center floor, finding a way to beat Indiana, and moving on. Luckily, that's what the 76ers did. It seems apt that, starting today, the Sixers are 24-24. They have 34 games to redefine this season.
 
I'm of the opinion that the Sixers will be a playoff team. Obviously, they're in the seventh spot right now so I'm not suggesting anything crazy. But, if we're going to be honest, right now they also look like a one-and-done playoff team. And maybe that's fine for this season. Maybe, given everything that's happened -- Cheeks, DiLeo, Brand, no Brand -- that would be considered successful.
 
Maybe ... I just don't buy it. If I'm part of the Sixers, if I'm DiLeo, I have 34 games to mold this team, to give them a chance -- come April -- to surprise a few people. There are two issues, in my opinion: 1.) Consistent outside shooting; 2.) Legitimate, nightly, post presence.
 
There are 13 days until the trade deadline, and I believe it's likely the Sixers will make a deal. Obviously a new player(s) impact(s) these two areas (one would hope, anyway, that Stefanski wouldn't deal for a swingman). But given the current pieces, let's look at these two areas.
 
Oh, and I welcome Statman to chime in with some pertinent stats. I know the Sixers have had a rollecoaster of a season beyond the arc. At one point a few games ago I crunched a number that the Sixers shot something like 42 percent from the three-point line in victories and something like 27 percent in losses.
 
1.) Consistent outside shooting: When the Sixers hit that DiLeo-instated number -- 5 -- they seem unstoppable. With their array of talent, adding that final weapon sends them soaring. But, lately, they've been bad. And I don't know if it has anything to do with Brand's return or not. Nothing I've seen on the court makes me believe it was Brand. But, lately, their rhythm on offense has been non-existent. Many of the outside shots they've taken have been wrong. With one exception: Royal Ivey's big three-pointer from the left corner in the second half against the Celtics. That one, absolutely, was going to be a make.
 
Quickly, in case you're doubting the inconsistency, here's the Sixers three-point shooting by month: October: 28.0 percent; November: 34.2 percent; December: 23.5 percent; January: 39.0 percent; February: 30.0 percent.
Look at December to January. It's not surprising the Sixers were 10-5 in January.
 
We've talked before about why they were shooting so well. It was because DiLeo had them green-lighted, but not just for any three-pointer. He had them green-lighted for the three pointer that came off penetration, kick, swing to the open man, shot. Perfect. Percentage soars. What happened?
 
It feels, almost, like when you cut a turn too close, nail your tire on a curb, and your car's alignment is slightly off. Something has been slightly off in the last seven to eight games. They're driving mostly straight, but each offensive possession feels derailed a touch. And while those high-percentage shots the Sixers often get (Speights alley-oop, Iguodala dunk, Dalembert dunk, Young lefty floater ...) aren't going to be affected, the outside shooting will be.
 
How do they get that rhythm back? Run the heck out of the ball. All shooters know that when the outside shot seems off, you get yourself a layup in transition first, get that nice quick bucket to put yourself back in the game. Perhaps that seems a little too simple, but basketball is basketball. And the Sixers know they need to run first. The outside shot, for this team, should complement their myriad of slashers -- not the other way around.
 
2.) Legitimate, nightly, post presence: Brand was supposed to be the answer here. Brand was supposed to be the half-court scorer in the playoffs (at least that's what we believed, at least I did). Now look at the roster, does that player exist? Not really. But I propose the following: Thaddeus Young and Marreese Speights. I dig Reggie Evans energy, but I don't want to see him catching the ball on the block, charged with getting the Sixers a crucial bucket. But Young? And Speights? Young has sometimes struggled when he faces up to the basket. He'd be 100 percent effective if he didn't have to bring the ball with him, but he often bobbles it when trying to get from the three-point line to the rim. He leaves it just a second behind him and then the whole drive suffers. But on the block? He's so slippery down there. He has good footwork, he can finish with that floater, he shields his defender and can finish on the opposite side. If worked properly, he could draw a double-team. Not sure how his passing is out of a double-team, though.
 
And Speights, I don't know what happened last night against Indiana. He only played seven minutes. I didn't see the minutes he played, so I can't comment if he deserved more. All I know is that when he is on the floor, his defender can't worry about Andre Iguodala or Andre Miller, his defender must focus on him. Can't say the same for Reggie Evans or Samuel Dalembert. (Although, very quickly, Samuel has been playing great basketball lately. Fantastic basketball. No complaints, here. My only point is that his defender doesn't have to honor the 15-footer like you'd honor Speights from out there).
 
I've heard some talk about Speights' left knee. He has tendonitis in it. But I asked him before the Houston Rockets game (remember he played only 3 minutes the game before in New Orleans) if his knee had limited his minutes. He looked at me, kind of scowled, and said, "No ..." -- that's to say, the clear implication is his minutes were NOT limited by his knee, and perhaps he was a little miffed at the lack of minutes. As were some Sixers fans.
 
Now, final thing.  Last night, Ed Stefanski said what we've said on here from Day 1: "This is Andre Iguodala's team." We said on here that Iguodala was the conductor of this team -- that was back in October. And I remember folks were saying that was ludicrous. (Yes, I'm aware I'm blatantly self-promoting here, as well as taking a risk since Iguodala is still a young kid that will go through plenty more growing pains.)
 
In my opinion, those are the two issues that the Sixers must address to go from good to better, to go from first round to second round. Let me know if you're seeing something that also needs addressing.
 
--Kate
 
Kate Fagan @ 3:02 PM  Permalink | 46 comments
POSTED: Thursday, February 5, 2009, 4:27 PM

We all know by now that Elton Brand is done for the season. From the first time Brand spoke after the dislocated right shoulder -- which occured on Dec. 17 -- he made it clear that if the rehab didn't go smoothly, and he was still in pain, surgery would be the next step.

So that's where the 76ers are right now: Brand will be having surgery, as early as Monday. And he'll be done for the season. There was a few twists and turns that led from Brand scoring 12 points in that win over the Houston Rockets last week, and now this. First he went scoreless and didn't play in the second half on Tuesday night. Before that game, he came onto the court with a brace. At halftime, he told the training staff that his shoulder had stiffened up, but that he could go if necessary.

On Wednesday, Brand wasn't at practice. The Sixers said he received an MRI, but the MRI showed the injury was healing as scheduled. The Sixers said Brand was day-to-day but "expected to play." So, what gives? Then we learn that the MRI was viewed only by a technician, Brand had yet to see his doc, and his agent, David Falk, was flying into town.

Kate Fagan @ 4:27 PM  Permalink | 47 comments
POSTED: Thursday, February 5, 2009, 3:59 PM
A source close to the 76ers has confirmed a story initially reported by Comcast Sportsnet: Sixers power forward Elton Brand is done for the season.
It is believed that on Monday, Brand, who signed a five-year $80 million contract in July, will have season-ending surgery on his dislocated right shoulder.
Calls to the Sixers went unanswered.
Brand initially injured the shoulder on Dec. 17 against the Milwaukee Bucks. He has played six games since returning, but has struggled, averaging only 5.7 points and 4.7 rebounds in 18 minutes a game.
Brand went scoreless and did not play in the second half of Tuesday’s 100-99 loss to the Boston Celtics. In his 8 minutes, 40 seconds of first-half game time, Brand wore a brace on his shoulder for the first time.
Yesterday, Brand had an MRI on his right shoulder.
The Sixers initially announced that the MRI showed the injury was healing as scheduled, but things began looking murky when news surfaced that the MRI was read only by a technician. Brand’s agent, David Falk, also flew into town to discuss the status of his client.
Brand missed almost the entire 2007-08 season with a ruptured Achilles.
 
More in a few minutes ....
--Kate
Kate Fagan @ 3:59 PM  Permalink | 15 comments
POSTED: Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 3:33 PM
Elton Brand had an MRI today confirming his injured right shoulder is healing as expected. (AP)

76ers power forward Elton Brand did not practice today, nor was he available at practice. Instead he was receiving an MRI to check the state of his injured right shoulder. The MRI test revealed that Brand's injury is still healing as expected. According to the Sixers, the injury is not fully healed, but in the process of healing. Tomorrow, Brand is seeing Dr. Craig Morgan in Delaware to evaluate the shoulder, which was dislocated on Dec. 17. The Sixers said Brand is "day-to-day" but is expected to play tomorrow night against the Indiana Pacers.

Brand played only 8 minutes, 40 seconds in last night's 100-99 loss to the Boston Celtics. He did not score and looked to be more out of rhythm than usual -- it was his sixth game since returning against the New York Knicks. This injury with Brand is tough to decode because, it goes without saying, the Sixers have played better without him. So, naturally, you wonder if the Sixers (and Brand) are being especially cautious because they're doing fine without him.

Last night, Sixers coach Tony DiLeo knew that Brand was hurting, that his shoulder had stiffened up, but that Brand was willing to play if the Sixers needed him. Brand did not play. Today at practice, DiLeo said that if Brand had not notified the training staff that his shoulder was hurting, DiLeo absolutely would have played him in the second half. DiLeo said, "It's difficult not knowing if he's 100 percent or not." I imagine it is. I imagine it's tough for a coach. You already have a thousand different things racing through your brain during a game, let alone trying to weigh the pros and cons of playing Brand vs. not playing Brand vs. playing a slightly injured Brand vs ....

Kate Fagan @ 3:33 PM  Permalink | 22 comments
POSTED: Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 12:00 AM
Boston's Ray Allen gets a lift from his teammates after hitting the game-winning three-pointer. (Ron Cortes/Staff Photographer))

Either you watched it on Comcast, witnessed it in person, or caught the replay on the highlights. No matter when or how you saw the last play of tonight's game against the Boston Celtics, you're still probably wondering: Why was Ray Allen open? Why, of all players, would the Sixers leave Allen -- known from coast-to-coast for his smooth outside jumper?

We'll answer that in a second. But the hard reality is the Sixers did leave him, and it cost them a victory: The Boston Celtics won 100-99 when Allen made a three-pointer with 0.5 seconds left on the clock. Six seconds earlier, Andre Iguodala made a fadeaway jumper that looked to be the game-winner.

Why was Allen open? Here's the sequence of events:

Kate Fagan @ 12:00 AM  Permalink | 22 comments
POSTED: Monday, February 2, 2009, 7:00 PM

I was not at the Wachovia Center on Saturday night. I did not witness what was -- by all accounts -- a remarkable display of futility, ineptitude, or any other appropriate word describing the drought the 76ers endured/produced against the New Jersey Nets. I imagine we could ponder for paragraphs on what produced that stretch (heck, it's not like Friday night's win over the Washington Wizards lit the world on fire), but since I didn't watch it with my own eyes, I'll let those that did offer any lingering thoughts.

Let's look at how Saturday night impacts Tuesday night against the Boston Celtics.

I think with the way the Sixers had been playing for most of January, it was acceptable to point to the game against the Boston Celtics as a test of the Sixers' progress. They would have been above .500 (we're speaking as if they won that game against the Nets), coming off a seven-game win streak, with wins in 11 of 13 games. I think it would have been fair to look at the game against the Celtics as a legitimate litmus test. We watched them lose badly, in both their early-season games at Boston. But this would have been a middle-of-the-season game, with both the Sixers and Celtics playing what you would consider to be solid basketball. The Celtics had endured their rough patch after the sky-high winning streak. The Sixers would have endured that poor start and seemed to prove themselves as a much better team since.

Kate Fagan @ 7:00 PM  Permalink | 11 comments
About this blog
Keith Pompey has been an Inquirer reporter since September 2004. He takes over the Sixers beat after covering the Temple men’s basketball team for the past three years and Temple football the past two seasons. Pompey also previously covered the Penn and Drexel men’s basketball team and Villanova football team after initially focusing on high school sports.

Pompey is a native Philadelphian and a University of Pittsburgh. Follow him on Twitter @PompeyOnSixers or reach Keith at kpompey@phillynews.com.

ABOUT MARC NARDUCCI

Marc Narducci has served in a variety of roles with the Inquirer since beginning in 1983. He has covered the 76ers as a backup and a beat writer. In addition, Narducci has covered everything from the Super Bowl to the World Series and a lot in between. Narducci also has a true passion for South Jersey scholastic sports, which he has covered for many years.

Keith Pompey Inquirer Staff Writer
Philly.com Sports Videos
Blog archives:
Past Archives: