share
email
font size
options
 
Saturday, April 26, 2008

So much of the talk at both the 76ers and Pistons practices on Saturday centered on the first five minutes of Game 4. Both Andre Iguodala and Rodney Carney said that the first five minutes will be crucial.

"We have to be ready in the first five minutes," Iguodala said.

Added Carney, "I think the first five minutes will determine how the game will go."

The thinking is that the Pistons were pounded, 95-75 in Game 3, and will want to come out strong and make a statement in the beginning of the game.

Pistons coach Flip Saunders also mentioned the importance of gaining early momentum.

"In their two wins, the Sixers got off to good starts early," Saunders said.

That's not entirely true. In the Sixers 90-86 win in Game 1, Detroit led 27-22 after one quarter and 51-38 at halftime.

And in the Sixers' 95-75 win on Friday, the score was tied, 20-20 after one period.

Still, the point is, that Detroit must re-establish itself after getting embarrassed on Friday.

The Sixers will try to build on the momentum. Either way, it might be placing too much on the early porition of the game and not enough on the late stages.

In both losses, Detroit faded in the second half. The Pistons were outscored 52-35 in the second half of Game 1 and 51-35 in the second half on Friday.

What this seems to indicate is that the team with the younger legs, the Sixers, has been the one in control in the second half of both wins.

So while the start of any game is important, the Sixers have proven that the finish might be more crucial.

Here are some random thoughts on other topics.

ITEM: Many have voiced their displeasure with the new format of the blog. Morty among others asked if anything can be done.

RESPONSE: Change is always difficult, but this is the way it's going to be. The other format was easier for me, but my view has been to make the best of it. For those who have followed us over here, your participation is greatly appreciated. If there are any specific complaints, please email them to me (mnarducci@phillynews.com) and they will be forwarded to the appropriate people.

ITEM: The other day The Greek noted that one of the blog posts was done at 3:47 a.m. He suggested that somebody took over the blog and began posting.

RESPONSE: No, that was me. The reason for the early post was simple. After falling asleep early the night before (following five nights in Auburn Hills, Michigan), this reporter was awakened by his cat at 3 a.m. who wanted to eat.

Anybody with a hungry animal, realizes that it's easier to feed the little critter than to continue to hear him crying for food. It was too difficult to return to sleep, so it was as good a time as any to work on the blog. 

ITEM: Xing writes that Flip Saunders may find himself on the unemployment line if the Sixers eliminate the Pistons.

RESPONSE: Book it.

ITEM: Where are all those people who complained about Reggie Evans earlier this year?

RESPONSE: Evans' warrior mentality has been one of the biggest reasons the Sixers lead this series. And lost in how well he is playing is how Thaddeus Young is excelling in his first postseason. Young is averaging 10.3 points in the first three playoff games and has been outstanding in the first quarters, when many of his teammates have not gotten off to quick starts.

Who would have thought that after three games, that Evans and Young would be averaging more points than Andre Iguodala?

ITEM: Speaking of Iguodala, there has been the expected backlash with the way he has played this series (7 for 33 shooting).

RESPONSE: There is no question he has been pressing and it's why he has committed 12 turnovers. For the Sixers to have the lead, with him playing below par, has to actually be encouraging. And it says here that Iguodala will bounce back. Write him off at your own risk. 

By the way, one other admirable trait of Iguodala is that he doesn't hide when things aren't going well. He is a stand-up guy who has faced the constant questions of his slump.

ITEM: Ed Rosenberg writes that the Sixers can win this series and whether it happens remains to be seen. Ed points out that the Sixers know they can win it.

 RESPONSE: Ed, no question in their minds now, they know they can win it. The Sixers won't admit it, but it seems as if they entered the series thinking they could be competitive. None of the players were making foolish predictions, but there was a feeling that they could compete. Three games is a big enough sample to make the players realize they can not only compete, but win. Who knows what will happen, but as Ed mentions, it's going to be very interesting and very exciting.

ITEM: More and more are writing in about the need to extend Andre Miller.

RESPONSE: Of all the moves, none would be more important than extending Miller. If it doesn't happen and he departs after next season, the Sixers will take a serious step back. This should be priority No. 1 in the offseason.

 

 

Posted by Marc Narducci @ 10:32 PM  Permalink | 44 comments
44
Comments   
Posted 06:18 AM, 04/27/2008
sfw
Marc, good comments in all. Seems like the regulars + are now back on board with this new format. No big deal once you sign up. Can put the nail in the coffin tonight.
Posted 07:46 AM, 04/27/2008
jjg
Marc, Good point about 2nd half. Where separation has taken place. Saunders might be wise to use his bench more. Where's Juan Dixon & Jarvis Hayes? *** Reggie Evans without playoff adrenaline is Joe Lunchpail minus the thermos, an eminently moveable piece in the long view. His highly-motivated, turbo play in gms 1-3 has driven Sixers though. *** While Iguodala may be a stand-up guy before the Press, his court demeanor at times is fractious and impetuous towards both referees and teammates; much room for improvement there. *** Miller has been a great influence for the most part. But what will it take to sign the 32 year-old PG who provides no deep, floor-spreading threat and who faces the bulldog defender, Time? Also, the admittedly "West Coast guy" might be inclined to land there to close his career. Any insight on that? *** Tonight's game has fascinating appeal; many subplots, much on the line.
Posted 08:29 AM, 04/27/2008
hugh
Marc, I don't know that I would extend Miller beyond one more year. I think he will get a better offer than that, so I don't know if I would even try to extend him at all. As JJG said, he is a 32 year old PG who can't spread the floor. That said, he has easily been the team's MVP and should receive significant praise for his play this season. We all spoke a lot about Calderon earlier this season - I think he would be a good fit at the point or someone younger who can shoot it a little bit. I just think he will demand more than he is worth at this point in his career. Also, JJG is right about him being a West Coast guy. Side note: Collison is going back to school.
Posted 09:03 AM, 04/27/2008
seude
Jumpin, good point about Dixon, he is experienced and a perimeter threat, now a better option than Afflalo. In the world of the agent its tough to negotiate with more than one player at a time, wish we could get Lou and the 2 Dre!s in a room together and come to a salary solution. Hinrich in Chicago has a contract that actually decreases in value, the only one I!ve seen, that type of deal could work for A.Miller.The further we go this year, the better leverage A.Miller will have. It means we are close. Hugh, one of the issues everybody has is if Thad, Iggy, and A.Miller are our 3,2, and 1 how will we spread the floor, it is a concern but this series is answering the question partly. We seem to have an identity that doesn!t include the long shot, but is based on defense and scoring enough to win; adding a solid 15 to 20 low post threat may be enough to get us to as championship. One thing about Reggies play in this series, besides energy he is actually providing points, he is improving offensively at a time when defense gets tougher, the playoffs; can this carry over to next year?
Posted 09:17 AM, 04/27/2008
seude
Jumpin, good point about Dixon, he ie experienced and a perimeter threat. Wish we could get A.MILL., Iggy and L.Will. in a room together and work out a salary solution.[ 10,12, and 6 ?]. Hinrich has a contract that decreases in value, a good solution for A.Miller. Hugh, the issue next year of Thad, Iggy and A.Mill. at the 3,2, and 1 is always the spreading of the floor on offense. But the personality of this team is defense and getting enough scoring to win. If they win this series without a true low post threat then I, for one, don!t feel it is a need to have a starter that can shoot the 3. A 3 pt. threat off the bench to go with Carney would work for me. By the way, besides energy, Reggie is also supplying points in the postseason, when defense gets tougher. Could this continue next year?
Posted 09:29 AM, 04/27/2008
seude
Hope Iggy can bounce back like Josh Smith did last night, its amazing what playing in front of the home crowd does for a player.
Posted 09:44 AM, 04/27/2008
jjg
seude, I've liked Dixon since Maryland days. Small, liability on D, but shoots with nerve and seems to have the winning sense. Sixers and summer dollar distribution is their conundrum - AI, AM, LW plus PF & shooter need. I lean towards hugh's idea of short-term Miller signing but why would AM settle for that? After season he's had, he's in the catbird seat [thanks, James Thurber and Red Barber] at the negotiating table. Calderon or Lowry would be nice addition if Miller heads elsewhere.
Posted 09:54 AM, 04/27/2008
bski
Unless we sign a free agent PG or get one via trade, we must extend Miller. I don't see anyone we have now stepping into that role and giving us what Miller does night in and night out. Keep him around a couple more years to give us time to draft/trade for/sign a free agent/develop someone capable of taking over for him.
Posted 10:10 AM, 04/27/2008
seude
Jumpin, there are some interesting p.g.!s coming out but the issue is ,whoever we draft, has to be able to score the ball. Don!t know if you saw J.Gordon at all but he has a "ballsy" attitude like Billups has and is raw but with Cheeks and A.Mill. as teachers it would be nice to add a young pt. in the 2nd round, using the Utah pick to get a 2nd rounder, that can be groomed to take over in 2 years. Question, can L.Will. start at the point for this team if they allow the offense to run through Iggy at the 2, ala P.Pressey, for say 20 min. a night in the future, maybe our pt. guard is already here.
Posted 10:16 AM, 04/27/2008
bski
Suede----That's a lot of questions. Do we want a questionable PG in Lou and do we really want Iggy at SG and to run the offense through him? As you say, maybe our PG is already here but are you willing to take a chance at ending the progress we've made thus far or possibly going backwards to find out?
Posted 10:27 AM, 04/27/2008
seude
Bski, I would resign A.Miller for 4 years at app. 8 mill. if possible but as Hugh said earlier, is he a west coast guy.By the way, with a lot of quick ,young pt. guards in the west does it hurt A.Miller!s chances of going out west. I thought the Kidd trade was not a good move because of Paul, Parker and Conley in the future.Portland for example wants to upgrade at pt. but can they bring in A.Mill. knowing he will have to guard Paul and Parker in the playoffs? The east is a better fit for A.Miller. Bski, just putting out an option if A.Miller wanted to leave.
Posted 10:45 AM, 04/27/2008
jjg
I wouldn't want a starting backcourt of Williams & Iguodala (in Pressey role) as possession of ball is paramount. Also, getting ball into right hands in right spot isn't a johnny-come-lately, easily developed skill. If not Miller, team will need a true point guard replacement. suede, Saw only a glimpse of Gordon; heard his play didn't match rep.
Posted 10:48 AM, 04/27/2008
bski
Suede---I got you. I'm just battling the idea that it's no big thing or we may actually be better off if we move Miller. We've all seen it happen many times where a team moves a player to fill what they see as a bigger need (like us at PF) only to then need to try to figure out how to fill the hole they created by moving the first player. I'm not saying that Miller brings everything at the PG. Yes, it would be nice if he were a consistent 3-pt threat, but every other PG out there has deficiencies as well. I really believe that Miller is one of those players who makes many contributions to a team that may not directly appear in his stats. His true value shows in the improvement of the stats of his teammates. I also believe that even though we see what he does, we will not fully realize everything he brings until he is no longer here doing it for us. Obviously, after he's gone, it will be to late.
Posted 10:54 AM, 04/27/2008
seude
Jumpin, Iggy is far from ready to make Pressey like decisions, hopefully in the future. I have some good trade possibilities but refuse to discuss till after this great run is over. What does Flip do tonight? He doesn!t strike fear in my heart like other coaches might. Does Mcdyess possibly beintg out help or hurt them? Maxiel in short bursts seems more effective for them, and if he gets big minutes do we have to play Reggie more?
Posted 11:03 AM, 04/27/2008
bski
Missing McDyess would definitely hurt Detroit. McDyess and Sheed hiiting from 18ft, like they were in game 2, gives us lots of trouble. Tough covers for Dalembert, Evans, Thad, etc... when they're out there. Also, when that happens the Pistons play inside out with their bigs hitting jumpers and opening up driving lanes for their guards in the paint (remember Prince in game 2).
Posted 11:19 AM, 04/27/2008
bski
Suede---Flip doesn't worry me either. In truth, the Pistons don't worry me that much at this point either. Yes, they are a good team. Yes, they've made the EC finals 5 straight years, but that was then. We are not playing the '03, '04, '05, '06, '07 Pistons. This is 2008 and not much of what the Pistons have done in the past matters now. Right now it appears that as long as the Sixers play their game they are good enough to beat Detroit.
Posted 11:22 AM, 04/27/2008
SwollCracker
McDyess' offensive abilities from the perimeter and on the o-glass have given Young some problems. McDyess out would mean more minutes for Maxiell and Theo Ratliff. Reggie Evans has demonstrated an ability to handle both of those guys but the Sixers will need some solid minutes out of Jason Smith to truly take advantage of McDyess' absence. I look for big games out of Young and Eans and a nice supporting role for Smith tonight.
Posted 11:23 AM, 04/27/2008
jjg
suede, You echoed my point with your first statement - no Iggy as chaperone of the ball, period. *** Flip's hangdog expression may indicate passivity or futility but he's got somethin' goin' on upstairs to win 50-plus 3 straight years. Wouldn't underestimate his coaching acumen or impact/adjustment potential. *** Even though he played well in 2, McDyess has looked old. Fresh blood might inject Pistons with needed energy to ball. Maxiell, bull in china shop in 1, could counter Evans.
Posted 11:32 AM, 04/27/2008
JASON RINGLER
Marc, Good point about Thad Young, he is playing way beyond his years. Iggy has handled the adversity really well. Evans has displayed the toughness that the Pistons are not used to seeing. As for Andre Miller, sorry for the cliche, but the best trades are the ones not made. Carneys athletic ability will continue to give Hamilton fits. Jason-Los Angeles
Posted 01:11 PM, 04/27/2008
ReclinerGM
The lack of respect continues. Up 2-1, playing at home tonight, winning by 20 on Friday, Jon Barry (one of the worst player analyst) still just said the Sixers have no chance of winning this series. Then he had the nerve to just say give the Spurs some credit after what he just said about the 76ers. He is an idiot!
Posted 01:35 PM, 04/27/2008
jjg
Inkling: Dalembert won't get 22 & 16 again; rather, will spur older Piston fans to memories of Joe Strawder and Otto Moore. 2nd inkling: Wallace will improve on 2 & 5; will sneer at all compliments.
Posted 02:00 PM, 04/27/2008
seude
Jumpin, hope he still looks to score, we don!t need 20 but 10 to 15 would be nice. Otto was a bit of an underachiever[ poor man!s J.B. Carroll]; Strawder, don!t recall. I think Sheed!s game is somewhere in between what we!ve seen but Billups has yet to assert himself. Rec.g.m., wonder what it is going to take to get that respect; if we, no when we win the series, what excuses will they[national media] give then.
Posted 02:30 PM, 04/27/2008
jjg
seude, Gotta love Carroll's eventual sardonic tag "Joe Barely Cares."
Posted 02:33 PM, 04/27/2008
ReclinerGM
seude - we already know the excuse. Detroit gave the series to the Sixers. Detroit didn't come to play. Detroit is getting old. Detroit coach Flip Saunders lost his player and isn't a good playoff coach. You see the pattern there? It will all be about what Detroit didn't do and not what the Sixers did. It's inevitable.
Posted 02:50 PM, 04/27/2008
seude
If it fosters an us against the world attitude for our team I hope they keep it up. Detroit won!t give any blackboard material so let the national media do it for them.
Posted 02:51 PM, 04/27/2008
ReclinerGM
All the Sixers have to do is match the expected intensity by the Pistons early and do what they've been doing which is beating the older, slower Pistons in the second half when they don't have the legs. Billups shot has been off (short often) because he is getting pounded in the post by A. Miller and chasing him around countless ball screens. I don't see that changing in tonight's game which I will be center court for. ****More Sixers talk here: http://www.reclinergm.com****
Posted 03:13 PM, 04/27/2008
sixerzguy
Bad trend for the Sixers - it seems like the team that's supposed to win is winning all the Game 4's.
Posted 03:16 PM, 04/27/2008
ReclinerGM
Sixerzguy - good thing there is absolutely not correlation there.
Posted 03:35 PM, 04/27/2008
sixerzguy
I wish Game 3 had been a lot closer, the Sixers might be thinking this Detroit team is easy to beat. Sixers, trust me, Detroit watched Friday's debacle. They've looked at every turnover they committed and are gonna make sure to be more careful with the ball, and not make the same passes as last time. They have a much better idea of the strengths and weaknesses of the Sixers' defense.
Posted 03:39 PM, 04/27/2008
sixerzguy
ReclinerGM, I hope not. But my job has to do with numbers and problem-solving, and I can't help but look at things like that. I was terrified of the Friday game, because they've been horrible on Fridays. And I was real uneasy watching Game 2 on CSN, Deep Sixer poster KM mentioned this before for Game 1 - when he turned to CSN, the Sixers fell behind, when he turned to TNT, they made a run.
Posted 03:40 PM, 04/27/2008
sixerzguy
Last one for the afternoon... Sixers, I hope you've studied Detroit's successes, and not their failures, because you're gonna see more of what Detroit's been doing well, like Tayshaun Prince's offense. Iggy, even if you can't get your offense on track, remember what it is you do best - defense. Steal, rebound and harass, and make sure your teammates know their rotations and assignments. And about your offense, I got to see your missed shots again, and you know what? It's all in your head. You're getting your shots over Tayshaun fine. Let the offense come to you, don't tense up if you gotta put up a shot, even though Tayshaun is one of the NBA's best defenders, he's not affecting you, YOU're affecting you. I understand that you can get cerebral, and if you feel like you're thinking too much, let's use that - think about everything else but your shot. You can lead, I've seen it, so LEAD!
Posted 03:51 PM, 04/27/2008
seude
Labron to Delonte, brought back memories of M.J. to Paxon.
Posted 04:41 PM, 04/27/2008
Ricky - Sixers4guidos
Marc I also think this format of the blog is (way) worse than the original one, anyway the most important thing is the contents and not the layout so no big deal, we'll get used to it btw I posted a comment on the other article but it didn't show up yet, am I being censored or what ?? Just finished watching Wash-Cavs, great game but I don't get how Stevenson got only a tech after that hard fould on LBJ, I am one of those who think he gets too many calls (or non-calls, like when he takes his trademark 4 steps-drives...) but this time Stevenson should have been ejected..
Posted 05:32 PM, 04/27/2008
TINA
Anyone watch the halftime report of the spurs/suns game? I love how even at 2-1 with a convincing win on Friday, the so called "experts" are not giving the Sixers any credit. Apparently to all of them, it is the Pistons that are making all of the mistakes, not the Sixers doing things correctly. I still don't get how they can't give even an ounce of credit to a team that forced 25 turnovers to the best ball handling team in the league. Well, I guess its up to our guys tonight to once gain, prove these experts wrong like they have done almost all season. Sixers win a close one tonigh!
Posted 06:45 PM, 04/27/2008
bski
Tina & recliner GM: You are on the money. I did watch halftime of the Spurs-Suns and Jon Barry is an idiot! He very emphatically stated that this series is all about the Pistons. He said he hasn't seen the Sixers take away what Detroit has tried to do, it's just that Detroit is not executing. He said when they get back to playing Piston basketball, they will take care of the Sixers. Please!
Posted 09:21 PM, 04/27/2008
sixerzguy
Iggy is killing me, Mo did a horrible job in that 3rd quarter...
Posted 09:23 PM, 04/27/2008
gba
I am watching the game,and I have lost count of the number of turnovers, dumb shots and bad passes made by Iggy. He is killing us. Hamilton is now in a zone and Green offers no resistance. It is a shame we let this one get away when we were playing so well earlier. Letting Wallace make those 3 pointers was a killer.
Posted 09:30 PM, 04/27/2008
sixerzguy
"Yes, I think the Sixers can build off this, come on, if the game is gonna turn, it's gonna turn now... Uh oh, Iggy's got the ball... he shoots... brick! And Detroit takes it the other way and scores two easily..."
Posted 09:50 PM, 04/27/2008
hugh
A tale of two halves. I was thinking that I didn't like them playing from ahead too much - they always lose those leads. Iggy reinforced the notion that he is not a max guy and that when you need a run stopper - he is not the go-to guy.
Posted 09:55 PM, 04/27/2008
dbeas
its hard to stay in a game when your go to guy is igoudala. he should feel ashamed of his performance tonight. the 6ers seemed rudderless once the pistons started playing at their hardest. igoudala needs to look in the mirror.
Posted 10:06 PM, 04/27/2008
WhatNow
Does anybody else hear Iggy's falling value?????
Posted 10:49 PM, 04/27/2008
sixerzguy
We have to win this series without Iguodala. I no longer want to hear that "he needs to get started." There is nothing to start. Mo, take Iggy's 16 shots, reduce it to about 5, and re-distribute the remaining 11 between your other guys. Sammy took only 5 shots, his offense was one of the main reasons you won Game 3, how the heck did you forget about him? How about going to Reggie down low (the guy who helped us win Game 1), and actually make Rasheed work? Not your best game, I know you can do better in Game 5. I repeat, as soon as you get rid of the mantra "we need to get Andre Iguodala going," you increase our probability of winning. Last thing - Iggy is one of the best defenders in the league - we can use that to keep Prince from shooting 11-12, don't you think?
Posted 10:57 PM, 04/27/2008
ReclinerGM
Just got back from that sh!% fest. It basically was the tale of two halves. The Sixers picked the wrong one to show up for. Will recap on my blog in a bit. www.reclinergm.com
Posted 11:04 PM, 04/27/2008
ReclinerGM
Sixerzguy - real quick Andre Iguodala is NOT one of the best defenders in the NBA. He is a decent defender, but nothing special by any means. I think people are still living in the past a little bit regarding his defense. When he first came in the league he was a very good defender because that was his role and his focus with the real AI on the team at that time. As his offense responsibility increased his defense decreased in kind. He often takes plays off on defense (he did definitely did tonite) and he doesn't work hard off the ball on defense at all. During this playoff series Andre Iguodala is flat out getting exposed.
About Deep Sixer Blog
Kate Fagan was, until recently, the all-time leading three-pointer shooter in the University of Colorado women’s basketball program. Her former teammates say that’s because she was also the all-time leading three-point taker in program history. Somewhere along the way, journalism became her passion, and there are those who say that she still likes taking her shots. This is her second season as the 76ers beat writer for The Inquirer. She brings a rare combination of first-hand basketball insight, writing ability and an attitude that fits perfectly in her new hometown.
Deep Sixer Videos