Saturday, February 6, 2016

Archive: June, 2012

POSTED: Tuesday, June 26, 2012, 4:13 PM

PNC Bank has agreed to pay $90 million to settle a class-action suit challenging a common bank practice: maximizing overdraft fees by reordering the clearing of debits and ATM withdrawals, so that as many small debits as possible generate overdrafts.

The suit has already led to several such settlements, according to an announcement from plaintiffs' lawyers, including a $410 million settlement agreement last year with Bank of America. And the practice itself has been under scrutiny by the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Since 2010, the Federal Reserve has required banks to obtain an "opt in" from customers before subjecting them to the practice.  If customers don't opt in, their purchases or withdrawals will probably be declined if they push a balance into the red.

POSTED: Tuesday, June 12, 2012, 1:46 PM
Behold the Verizon iPhone 4: subject of the biggest, most wildly hyped technology launch since, um, AT&T's iPhone 4. Maybe even since the iPad. (AP Photo/Amy Sancetta)

I'll eventually have more to say about Verizon Wireless' new "Share Everything" pricing plans, which represent a major overhaul of the pricing hodgepodge that emerged during the wireless industry's adolescence and that often didn't seem to make sense. One key question is whether other carriers will follow suit.

But at a glance it seems clear that Verizon is pursuing two strategies that too often seem absent in wireless pricing: transparency and rationality.

For instance, Verizon and its competitors have been simultaneously offering unlimited-data plans or per-gigabyte metered pricing while also charging 10 or 20 cents for text messages that amount to minuscule data transmissions. Lately, three of the four national carriers have dropped unlimited-data plans for new customers and have used data-speed throttling to encourage existing customers to give up their unlimited plans in favor of new, metered plans.

POSTED: Thursday, June 7, 2012, 1:29 PM

Tim B. Lee - no, not that one - has a story to tell about his experience with Comcast over its broadband prices.  Or maybe I should say over his broadband prices, because his complaint is that cable companies always seem to play games with the prices they offer, and that Comcast played even more games after he outed them in his first of two recent blog posts, Why Comcast's Price Discrimination Strategy Makes Me Hate Them, on

Lee, unrelated to Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee, seems to suggest he'd prefer transparent pricing to Comcast's practice of what economists call price discrimination. It's a fascinating tale - absolutely worth reading if you need fortification before your next negotiation. But at the end, I wondered if he was focusing on the wrong problem.

Lee starts by recounting what happened when he was unhappy at a price increase - or the expiration of discounts - that raised his monthly broadband bill from $52.55 to $80.51. As he had done with Charter Communications when he lived in St. Louis, he called and threatened to cancel, saying he could choose Verizon's DSL service instead.

About this blog

Jeff Gelles, who writes the Inquirer's weekly Consumer 14.0 and Tech Life columns, takes a broad look at the marketplace of goods, services, and ideas.

Reach Jeff at

Jeff Gelles Inquirer Business Columnist
Also on
letter icon Newsletter