Saturday, October 10, 2015

Inviting downgrade, then whining about it

What did the U.S. expect after the GOP's historic game of brinksmanship?

Inviting downgrade, then whining about it


Thanks to Steve Benen, the "Political Animal" blogger at the Washington Monthly, for digging up the Fox Business Channel video (below) that perfectly illustrates the hypocritical Republican reaction to the S&P downgrade of U.S. treasuries.

Benen says the exchange two weeks ago between Neil Cavuto, Fox's vice president of business news, and John Stossel "was startling at the time, but seems even more relevant now." Cavuto tells viewers, “I would welcome a downgrade. I really would. I think it would be the pain from which we have a gain.” Stossel adds, “Maybe that would wake people up.”

Well, we just got woken up, with whatever consequences follow.  You don't have to agree with every aspect of S&P's analysis to realize that the agency has identified a very real - if political - risk of a U.S. default. Leading Republican politicians, egged on by folks like Cavuto and Stossel, showed and said repeatedly that they were willing to risk a default if they couldn't get their way on a budget deal.

Nor could that deal violate their line in the sand against any tax increases, ever - they're much too afraid of Grover Norquist.   Their promise to never raise taxes is apparently so sacrosanct that leaders such as House Majority Leader Eric Cantor are willing to toss other promises to the winds, such as the promise of old-age social insurance embodied in Social Security and Medicare. As I wrote in my column Sunday, Cantor recently told the Wall Street Journal that it was time for Americans to "come to grips with the fact that promises have been made that frankly are not going to be kept for many."

And now they want to call this "Obama's downgrade"?

Inquirer Business Columnist
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Jeff Gelles, who writes the Inquirer's weekly Consumer 14.0 and Tech Life columns, takes a broad look at the marketplace of goods, services, and ideas.

Reach Jeff at

Jeff Gelles Inquirer Business Columnist
Also on
letter icon Newsletter