Monday, August 3, 2015

Google, Verizon, and loophole-riddled promises

Google and Verizon finally weighed in yesterday with their long-awaited joint proposal on network neutrality. Much of the criticism centers on the proposal's carve-out for wireless networks. But even on the wireline side, the exceptions for "network management" could present a vast loophole.

Google, Verizon, and loophole-riddled promises


Google and Verizon finally weighed in yesterday with their long-awaited joint proposal on network neutrality, which I discussed last week in a blog item about leaked reports.

It turns out that some of last week's reports were off-kilter - you can read Google's public-policy blog on the actual proposal here, and see the joint statement here. This was not a commercial deal, and it does not blatantly give way to the concept of tiered pricing and fast lanes. On the other hand, the companies' suggested "legislative framework" opens the door to network owners' devoting a portion of their systems to specially priced "additional services," which fueled  protests such as this one from Free Press

So far, much of the critical reaction has centered on the companies' determination to limit any commitment to neutrality to the wireline broadband Internet, and exempt wireless networks from any such promises.  Perhaps Google did evil in going along with that, as some critics content.  but it's hardly a shock that Verizon - owner of what's widely considered the nation's best wireless network - is trying to protect its investment.

That demarcation is surely a concern, especially as the lines continue to blur between fiber-optic broadband and wireless broadband. But there may be bigger cause for concern in the statement's description of "network management" exceptions, which look like loopholes big enough to stuff, oh, a Comcast-BitTorrent-case through. (If you don't recall that famed net-neutrality violation, you can read about it here.)

Here's what Google and Verizon say about "Network Management":

Broadband Internet access service providers are permitted to engage in reasonable network management. Reasonable network management includes any technically sound practice: to reduce or mitigate the effects of congestion on its network; to ensure network security or integrity; to address traffic that is unwanted by or harmful to users, the provider’s network, or the Internet; to ensure service quality to a subscriber; to provide services or capabilities consistent with a consumer’s choices; that is consistent with the technical requirements, standards, or best practices adopted by an independent, widely-recognized Internet community governance initiative or standard-setting organization; to prioritize general classes or types of Internet traffic, based on latency; or otherwise to manage the daily operation of its network.

Comcast, as you'll recall, was simply trying to manage its broadband network when it blocked BitTorrent users - in fact, it said almost exactly that it was attempting to "reduce or mitigate the effects of congestion on its network." Under this deal, it would have to "disclose accurate and relevant information in plain language" about its practices. But it could block away, and with a smile.



Inquirer Business Columnist
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Jeff Gelles, who writes the Inquirer's weekly Consumer 14.0 and Tech Life columns, takes a broad look at the marketplace of goods, services, and ideas.

Reach Jeff at

Jeff Gelles Inquirer Business Columnist
Also on
letter icon Newsletter