Gov. Rendell and Mayor Nutter today announced that the developers of Foxwoods, a casino proposed for the Delaware riverfront in South Philly, are considering different locations for the project. Rendell said the developers did not say where those new locations might be, other than that they're inside the city limits, not on the riverfront and not within 10 miles of casinos already open in Bensalem and Chester.
Rendell cautioned that the new locations are only being considered. "This should not be considered definitive," Rendell said. "There is nothing that is sure or certain here."
Foxwoods and SugarHouse, another casino proposed for the Delaware riverfront, were awarded gaming licenses by the state in December 2006 but have run into a series of snags with the city government, state officials, neighborhood groups and anti-gaming protesters. Three other investment groups applied to the state Gaming Control Board for the two casino licenses in the city but were rejected. The decisions were based on the proposed locations, which prompted reporters to ask if the rejected casino applicants might now sue the state. "Anybody can sue anybody for anything," said state Sen. Vince Fumo, who had called for the Foxwoods meeting.*
SugarHouse and Foxwoods have previously refused to consider new locations. SugarHouse did not attend the meeting but is expected to gather with Rendell, Nutter and others after Labor Day.
* This quote was originally and incorrectly attributed to Rendell.
UPDATE: Foxwoods just released this statement:
"Foxwoods Casino Philadelphia has delivered a world-class casino project with significant value to the City and the Commonwealth, and was awarded a license in an open competition by the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board at our South Columbus Boulevard site. We have remained open to others’ responsible ideas, suggestions and concerns and have examined many alternatives to improve the value we will bring to the City and the State.
We have shared with City and State officials the obstacles that resiting would entail. Following those discussions we have agreed, in principle, to consider other alternative sites and ways that we can mutually overcome those obstacles. We are committed to continuing those discussions, while preserving our rights to the South Columbus Boulevard site."
Share your tips
|
Catherine Lucey luceyc@phillynews.com |
Chris Brennan brennac@phillynews.com |
- Attytood
- Philly Gossip
- Philebrity
- Philadelphia Will Do
- The Next Mayor
- Heard in the Hall
- The Daily Examiner
- Phawker
- Suburban Guerilla
- Young Philly Politics
- Hallwatch
- PoliticsPa
- Philly Blog
- The City Room
- Politico
- Drudge Report
- The Huffington Post
- Wonkette
- Eschaton
- Daily Kos
- Choose Judges on Merit
- Blogorrhea
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- Budget
- City Council
- City Hall
- DC
- Haikus
- Nutter
- Rendell
- Statehouse





