Council overrides Nutter's veto of Finnigan's Wake expansion
Despite community opposition, City Council voted unanimously to override Mayor Nutter's veto and allow Finnigan's Wake to install balconies along Spring Garden Street.
Council overrides Nutter's veto of Finnigan's Wake expansion
Jan Ransom
This post has been updated:
Despite community opposition City Council voted unanimously to override Mayor Nutter’s veto of a bill that would have allowed Finnigan’s Wake, in Northern Liberties to install balconies along Spring Garden Street, converting much of it to private use.
But the bill's sponsor, Councilman Mark Squilla said the decision to override was more about making a statement to Nutter that he shouldn't be involved.
"This is more or less procedural. It has nothing to do with the subject matter." The day Council received notice of Nutter's veto Squilla said, “As a district Council person you usually feel that your dealings within the community and your business within the district are sort of in a way are up to the Council person and not the Mayor as a whole.”
Squilla said he explained that to the Northern Liberties Neighbors Assocation and added that the project won't happen until there is a resolution.
"It's a matter of principle. I understand that," said Matt Ruben, president of the Northern Liberties Neighbors Association, pointing to the issue of Councilmanic prerogative. "I don't think it should be more important than the issue here."
Ruben said residents are upset, but for now they can only hold the Councilman to his word. "Those promises are all we have now that the law has actually been passed," he said.
Nutter had said in a veto notice to Council that the city should not convert a "public-right-of-way to a primarily private use in the face of opposition of the community resident association that represents the neighborhood most affected by the proposal."
Democatic cronyism at its finest. Who cares what the neighborhood actually wants. Professor1982
Comment removed.
Businesses all over the city have taken over the public spaces and no one ever says boo. Susie from Philly
Stupidity at its finest. Council did it to spite the Mayor. Politics pure and simple. Get to work and stop creating more mayhem. A. Martinez- BBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!
- Wow! Take that M.N..
“As a district Council person you usually feel that your dealings within the community and your business within the district are sort of in a way are up to the Council person and not the Mayor as a whole.” WTF, please asks questions prior to casting your votes.... 5th grader Checkthemirror
so for once Nutter has the interest of the neighborhood in mind, and council has the interest of their own agenda. Politics. EC391981
At least Bob Brady is consistent. He cleared the streets for the scab contractor Post Brothers and has now done it for Finnegans Wake. A bad omen for Mayor Nutter and evidence of where the power resides. Paul Deon
This whole thing of district council privilege is outdated BS. If you go to the trouble of completly redoing the zoning code, of emphasizing planning, and of enforcing ethics and campaign laws, then why should the district councilperson - most of whom aside from having no expertise in zoning, planning, or economic development, are beholden to particular interests or developers - get to have a veto power. bullrun
Put a New Orleans Bordello in Finnegan's! Aces high
Yeah, but is Finnegan's Wake any good? How's the food? bartello
So Council basically wants to fight over control of what they see as their little fiefdoms. Pathetic. Mr Tips
They're making a point, hell with what the people want. neddyflanders
So Nutter doesn't approve of using public land for private interests? How about his approval of the private Made in America concert, that tied up half the Ben Franklin Parkway and adjacent parks for 2 weeks, and resulted in the destruction of the ballfield at 22nd and the Parkway? YoPhilly123



Follow Chris on Twitter