Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Council not ready to sign off on AVI, additional schools funding

Get inside the halls of Philadelphia power with PhillyClout: Inside City Hall, the blog by the Philadelphia Daily News' city hall reporters.

28 comments

Council not ready to sign off on AVI, additional schools funding

POSTED: Wednesday, May 2, 2012, 11:27 AM

The school district may need more cash, but many City Council members today said they aren’t ready to support Mayor Nutter's proposed property reassessment plan, which would yield $94 million in additional schools funding.

“Once bitten, twice shy,” said Councilman Curtis Jones Jr., referring to a similar plea for funds from the district last year. “We got bitten last year by the notion of saving kindergarten…Now we’re proceeding, unfortunately for them, with a notion of accountability.”

The school district’s chief recovery officer Thomas Knudsen yesterday said that without the revenues anticipated with the passage of the Mayor's proposed property tax plan, it was not clear the schools could open in the fall, according to this Inquirer report. The district would still face a shortfall, even if the city provides additional funds.

Councilmembers said they understood the schools need funds, but said they wanted more information about what the money would pay for. Members also said that while they understand that the current property tax system is flawed, there are unanswered questions about how Nutter’s proposed shift to a property tax system based on market values, known as the Actual Value Initiative (AVI), would work and if there would be enough protections for vulnerable homeowners.

As Nutter has proposed it, the move to AVI would collect an additional $94 million for schools, a revenue increase that critics have labeled a “back door tax hike,” while Nutter says he is just capturing the increase in property values. Some members have said they'd like to debate the move to AVI and the additional schools funding as two separate issues.

Councilman Kenyatta Johnson said he still needed more information.

“I’m still waiting to look at all of our options. As much as I have a concern for children, I have to take into account the impact AVI has on all of my district," Johnson said.

Some Councilmembers have expressed support for the mayor’s propsosals. Councilwomen Blondell Reynolds Brown and Maria Quinones-Sanchez today had an op-ed in the Daily News, saying they support the move to AVI and the additional funding the mayor wants to collect.

Meanwhile, Councilman Mark Squilla, who has proposed delaying the move to AVI for a year, said he’d like to see more support from the state government for the schools.

“We have to put the state’s feet to the fire,” Squilla said. “The state took over the school district.”

28 comments
Comments  (29)
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:51 AM, 05/02/2012
    "'We have to put the state’s feet to the fire', Squilla said. 'The state took over the school district'." --- Ok. How's this? The State comes up with $50 million for this year but then as a requirement ALL PSD employees from the top to the bottom have to reapply for their jobs. Anyone who doesn't qualify is canned right there on the spot with no pension, medical, or whatever. The other money to makeup the difference has to come from Nutter and Council. They have to trim or eliminate their staff and all of the deputy mayors.
    psyrus
  • Comment removed.
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:01 PM, 05/02/2012
    Oh where oh where shall the money come from? If it were a business, it could file for bankruptcy, get a bail out - Ha!, reduce the number of facilities, reduce headcount, modernize facilitites to increase efficiencies, increase revenues (taxes). Problem is that elected officials and their political appointees would have to make these decisions which are tantamount to suicide. Enter Knudsen, scare tactics, we'll all pull together at the last minute and put another band aid on it until the next crisis.
    boroughboy
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:03 PM, 05/02/2012
    Nutter needs to go.
    PhilMar
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:07 PM, 05/02/2012
    What happened to the wage tax reduction? I should have listened to my father years ago and left the city. What a disgrace this City, and this administration are.
    discobiscuit
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:09 PM, 05/02/2012
    This comment has been deleted.
    stonewall jackson
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:14 PM, 05/02/2012
    Well then they better NOT support any type of 'temporary' tax to fill the black hole known as the Philadelphia School District. Those beggars @ the PSD better do whatever they have to do to make their ends meet. 40 kids in a class, transportation cuts whatever it takes. The tax payers (many of whom don't even use the schools) CANNOT keep digging into our wallets to make up for their shortfalls.
    Kennedy
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:20 PM, 05/02/2012
    & as far as AVI being revenue neutral there's just NO WAY! There are more Philadelphians paying too little in the way of property taxes as opposed to those who are over paying. There will be, and probably should be new revenue realized. They need to roll out AVI with a reasonable millage rate. But as far as I'm concerned I'd rather see the 94 million go to a new class of police officers not down the drain to the schools. As a tax payer I feel like that would be a better return on my investment.
    Kennedy
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:38 PM, 05/02/2012
    How about that casino revenue Since they opened in 2006 My taxes just keep going up... When am I going to see the lowered taxes.. We got sold a bill of goods...
    UnionsSuck
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:38 PM, 05/02/2012
    Let's just hope that it is a "accurate and fair system", And the AVI is based on the "TRUE MARKET VALUE" of today, not what it was based at three yrs ago, or based on what the market trend shows in the future!! NOW MEANS NOW, THAT'S WHAT IT SHOULD BE BASED ON!!!
    Dadair1
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:07 PM, 05/02/2012
    I say we call the school districts bluff, and do nothing. they are trying to scare the city into giving them more cash, they can't efficiently manage.
    Tyrone Biggums
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:14 PM, 05/02/2012
    As dirty as it makes me feel, I have to finally agree with Council. The two issues - AVI and school funding increases - need to be treated separately. There are definite problems over at SDP, and continuing to pour money into the hole isn't helping. This would be th enew textbook definition of 'throwing good money after bad'.
    citylumberjack
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:28 PM, 05/02/2012
    Tax XFINITY LIVE. It is on City Owned Land. How could the City permit a BAR be built on City Owned Land as economic development. Where is the Pilot Program. Raise the PILOT program up and raise 94 million. (Payment in Leui of Taxes). NUTTER is not moving forward in the right directions. (1) Ask PILOT to come up with the money first (2) Bear down and try to collect unpaid taxes....that would be leadership solution that is positive!!!!!!
    Clark_Kent_SuperHero
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:30 PM, 05/02/2012
    @CleanupPhilly you always seem to have all the answers. although you keep harping on collecting the unpaid property taxes which are due the city. this seems to be you pet peeve or level of expertise. so; you're running for office when...?
    ihatenewyorkers
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:14 PM, 05/02/2012
    Agreed...CleanupPhilly always has a lot to say in the way of complaints but never backing it up....I wonder why...hmmmm
    pepdsb
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:35 PM, 05/02/2012
    Those who are paying taxes now, will pay more under the AVI scenario. Instead of going after tax deadbeats, like the ones that had the warehouse burn down in Kensington least month, they will keep going to the same taxpayers and tell them to dig deeper. Its not the unions that are to blame for the financial mess, it is the politicians, the democrats and the republicans who are members of the most powerful unions in the land - the Republicrats!
    slugo
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:54 PM, 05/02/2012
    Let me go open the books, I guarantee I can make the budget work and cut out the kickbacks as well. After I cut 100 administrator jobs @ 440, that'll be $6 - $8 million recovered already. Then when redundancy is purged, I'm surre at least $30 million can be saved...
    solobrutha
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:02 PM, 05/02/2012
    According to the CIA Factbook, Philadelphia has a budget larger the GDPs of about 40 countries, or roughly 20% of the world. And they still can't balance a budget.
    verve
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:08 PM, 05/02/2012
    We need more information on the DROP...
    Panther78
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:34 PM, 05/02/2012
    I finally agree with Curtis Jones on something. Not one more cent in taxes. An 18% increase under Mayor Nutter is enough. The orange has been sucked dry dude. My house has gone down in value, not up as has most of Roxborough. Leave us alone. More taxes will only decrease the value further because higher taxes come with the place when you sell...which I may have to real, real soon.
    The Monk
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:44 PM, 05/02/2012
    I don't understand the claim that "he is just capturing the increase in value during the run up". That is not a justification for a tax increase. The city is not entitled to any run up ever. Show me you are running your city efficiently first. Cut of 2 to 3% of spending by the city would be enough to fund the 100 million the school district is requesting.

    At the same time, the union needs to agree to their give back before the city's money is necessary anyways. If the union doesn't give back the 156 million then the district is closing down.

    p.e.poole
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:44 PM, 05/02/2012
    I don't understand the claim that "he is just capturing the increase in value during the run up". That is not a justification for a tax increase. The city is not entitled to any run up ever. Show me you are running your city efficiently first. Cut of 2 to 3% of spending by the city would be enough to fund the 100 million the school district is requesting.At the same time, the union needs to agree to their give back before the city's money is necessary anyways. If the union doesn't give back the 156 million then the district is closing down. (HTML deleted)
    p.e.poole
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:42 PM, 05/06/2012
    Curtis marvin Gaye Jones i want to man up with u anytime and anyp;ace no tax increase for ur useless schools i will start a campaign to remove u
    nelson van alden


1
About this blog
Chris Brennan, a native Philadelphian and graduate of Temple University, joined the Daily News in 1999. He has written about SEPTA, the Philadelphia School District, the legalization of casino gambling, state government, the mayor, the governor, City Council and political campaigns. E-mail tips to brennac@phillynews.com
 Follow Chris on Twitter

David Gambacorta spent a small eternity writing about cops, drug dealers and serial killers. Now he’s writing about power and politics ­– which sometimes reminds him of the old crime beat. He joined the Daily News in 2005. And yes, he knows you’re not quite sure how to pronounce his last name. E-mail tips to gambacd@phillynews.com
 Follow Dave on Twitter.

Jan Ransom, a native New Yorker, joined the Daily News in 2010 after graduating from Howard University. She has since written about the difficulty of filing police complaints, tax deadbeats and life after violent home invasions. She joined the Daily News City Hall Bureau in 2011 and has plunged headfirst into reporting on administration budget battles and City Council shenanigans. E-mail tips to ransomj@phillynews.com
 Follow Jan on Twitter

Sean Collins Walsh is from Bucks County and went to Northwestern University. He joined the Daily News copy desk in 2012 and now covers the Nutter administration. Before that, he interned at papers including The New York Times, The Dallas Morning News and The Seattle Times. E-mail tips to walshSE@phillynews.com
 Follow Sean on Twitter

Blog archives:
Past Archives: