The administration today questioned another City Council budget proposal to deal with the $1.4 billion budget gap. This week Council suggested that the city extend the temporary sales tax hike proposed by Mayor Nutter from three to five years and borrow against the against the anticipated proceeds in the later years to help the city balance it’s budget in the early years.
Council’s plan suggested borrowing $200 million to cover expenses in the upcoming fiscal year. Members said this idea had more support than Mayor Nutter's proposed two-year temporary hike to the property tax.
Finance Director Rob Dubow this afternoon sent Council members a letter saying that borrowing to pay city operating expenses could raise red flags with financial rating agencies.
“It does provide some short term relief, but rating agencies have made it clear that if you start to borrow for operating costs, there are problems with your fiscal management,” Dubow said.
Dubow also provided Council with some research on the estimated cost to the city of their plan. He said that the interest costs of borrowing $200 million to cover expenses could cost $75 to $100 million.
Nutter last month proposed raising the city's property tax temporarily, by 19 percent in July and then 14.5 percent in July 2010. He also proposed a temporary three-year increase in the sales tax by 1 cent on the dollar. That tax is 7 cents on the dollar, with 6 cents going to the state and 1 cent to the city.
Council's plan keeps the increase at one cent on the dollar.
Council knows what it needs to do, but it won't do what the big business interests who grease the wheels of the political structure don't want it to do. It should make the wage tax progressive by providing a perfectly legal exemption for low-wage working families, then roll back the rate to what it was a few years ago, and it should roll back the rate of the gross receipts tax to an earlier level. It could take the latter step, exempt all businesses making less than $500,000 and still raise $70 million a year. Together these steps could raise all the money needed to erase the budget gap. But the Chamber of Commerce won't allow Council to go there. Stan Shapiro
Share your tips
Catherine Luceyluceyc@phillynews.com
Chris Brennan
brennac@phillynews.com
Jan Ransom
Ransomj@phillynews.com
- Attytood
- Philly Gossip
- Philebrity
- Philadelphia Will Do
- Its Our City
- Heard in the Hall
- The Daily Examiner
- Phawker
- Suburban Guerilla
- Young Philly Politics
- OurPhiladelphia
- PoliticsPa
- The City Room
- Politico
- Drudge Report
- The Huffington Post
- Wonkette
- Eschaton
- Daily Kos
- Choose Judges on Merit
- Blogorrhea
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- Budget
- Campaign News
- Casinos
- City Council
- City Hall
- DC
- Haikus
- Nutter
- Rendell
- Statehouse







Follow Chris on Twitter
