Administration Wants Changes to Pension Program for New Hires
Get inside the halls of Philadelphia power with PhillyClout: Inside City Hall, the blog by the Philadelphia Daily News' city hall reporters.
Administration Wants Changes to Pension Program for New Hires
Catherine Lucey
The Nutter administration says that tomorrow they will transmit legislation to City Council that would change the city pension plan for any new city workers.
Managing Director Camille Barnett said the proposed plan would combine a traditional pension -- at a lower benefit than current employees receive -- with a 401K plan that workers pay into. New hires who want more than the pension offering could sign up for the 401K plan and the city would provide matching funds.
Because tomorrow is the final council session of the season, the bill could not recieve final passage until fall. But if it were to pass, any workers hired after July 1 would be retroactively subject to the terms, Barnett said.
Finance Director Rob Dubow said the plan would save the city $500 million over 30 years. "This is a financial move to ensure the health of our pension fund," he said.
The city is sending the legislation to Council just two weeks before labor contracts for the four municipal unions expire. According to the city, pension terms are set both through city ordinances and collective bargaining agreements. The police and fire contracts will be settled through arbitration, while the two non-uniform worker contracts must be negotiated.
Barnett said the legislation shouldn't be viewed as a message to the unions as contracts are negotiated. "The motivation is to bring the changes to the [pension program,]" she said.
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
Tango is very jealous. So is usehisleg ephraim
How is a pension a freebie? All members pay into the pension (just like a 401k) - the difference is that they payout is a guaranteed amount. Yes- it is a better deal than a 401k because there is security - but I don't see how it's a freebie. stuffies
it's about time the city's pensions came into the 21st century. in private industry no one has a pension anymore. employees should save and be responsible for their own retirement, not the taxpayers of the city. i'm a little disappointed they weren't more aggressive though; e.g., why not put new employees in 401(k)s full-stop? $500mm over 30 yrs only works out to a saving of $17mm annually, which isn't all that much to a city budget of more than $1bn. baby steps, i guess heinz guderian
I'd like to see a generous 401k freebie. pensions simply don't work with the city. they must be funded and when they perform poorly, they require extra cash when the city can least afford it. and who trusts them to manage it well? no one, because they've done a terrible job. the only reason the unions like it is because taxpayers guarantee it. dreinterests- Everyone wants change, except the union.Obama wants change. It will never happen.



Follow Chris on Twitter