Saturday, February 6, 2016

Court rejects special election challenge

WASHINGTON – The special election is still on.

Court rejects special election challenge

Frank Lautenberg and Chris Christie
Frank Lautenberg and Chris Christie

WASHINGTON – The special election is still on.

A New Jersey appellate court has rejected a legal challenge to Gov. Christie’s call for an October special election to replace the late Sen. Frank Lautenberg.

“The Legislature has delegated broad authority to the State’s governor,” Judge Jane Grall wrote in an opinion for the three-judge panel. She later added, “without question the Governor was authorized to call a special election in this circumstance.”

The challenge, filed by Somerset County Democratic Chair Peg Schaffer, also cited the cost of the two elections – a combined $24 million, when the August primary is counted – and argued that having elections within weeks of each other in October and November could lower turnout. But the judges said they were not entitled to rule on the wisdom of the policy, only the laws surrounding the special election.

None of the state’s top Democrats, chairs or most prominent attorneys signed onto the court challenge, seemingly indicating its long odds from the start.

The Democratic plaintiffs wanted the general election to be moved to the same day as November's gubernatorial election.

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Barbara Buono again attacked Christie on the cost of the special elections Thursday night.

"Regardless of the outcome of the court’s decision, holding an election on a Wednesday in October is a cynical decision by Gov. Christie that will disenfranchise voters," Buono said in a statement.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Jonathan Tamari is the Inquirer’s Washington correspondent. He writes about the lawmakers, politics and policy that affect Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Tamari previously covered the Philadelphia Eagles and the NFL. Before that he worked in Trenton, reporting on the characters and color of New Jersey state government. He lives in Washington.

Reach Jonathan at

Jonathan Tamari
Also on
letter icon Newsletter