Sunday, February 7, 2016

Lautenberg misses Sandy vote

WASHINGTON -- As Senate Democrats try to pass a $60 billion bill for Sandy relief and beat back hostile Republican amendments, New Jersey is missing one vote: Sen. Frank Lautenberg's.

Lautenberg misses Sandy vote


WASHINGTON -- As Senate Democrats try to pass a $60 billion bill for Sandy relief and beat back hostile Republican amendments, New Jersey is missing one vote: Sen. Frank Lautenberg's.

The Democrat has not returned to Washington after the Senate's Christmas break, leaving Democrats with just a 52-47 edge. Working in their favor, though, is that any amendment to the bill requires 60 votes.

"Sen. Lautenberg is at home recovering from the flu and the Capitol physician advised him to continue resting and not return to the Capitol to vote unless absolutely necessary," said Lautenberg spokesman Caley Gray.

Lautenberg's absence could resonate on two levels. Immediately, there is the fact that he is not here for a key vote to the region. He has missed several recent votes: he did not vote on Dec. 11 and 13, and then again on the 27th and today. With today's absence, that means Lautenberg has missed votes on four of the last five days that the Senate has had roll call votes.

Lautenberg was in Washington for a Dec. 21 cloture vote on the Sandy relief bill, helping it clear a key procedural hurdle.

The bigger picture, though, is that Lautenberg, who turns 89 in January, is already facing whispers about his ability to serve another term. This absence on an important vote for the region could add fuel to a critique that is quietly, but not subtly, being raised by potential opponents in 2014.

Last week two Democratic sources on Capitol Hill told the Inquirer that Lautenberg had missed previous votes and a tour of storm-ravaged areas due to illnesses. Both stressed that the situation was not dire. One said Lautenberg had a bout of bronchitis and then the flu. 

Even as the debate on gun control heated up, Lautenberg made no public speeches or appearances, despite having long advocated for tougher gun laws. His statements on the issue were limited to press releases.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Jonathan Tamari is the Inquirer’s Washington correspondent. He writes about the lawmakers, politics and policy that affect Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Tamari previously covered the Philadelphia Eagles and the NFL. Before that he worked in Trenton, reporting on the characters and color of New Jersey state government. He lives in Washington.

Reach Jonathan at

Jonathan Tamari
Also on
letter icon Newsletter