Wednesday, November 25, 2015

U.S. Supreme Court To Hear Burlco Strip-Search Case Today

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear the Burlco Strip-Search case today. The case, which has attracted national attention, will lead to the first ruling on the controversial issue in 32 years.

U.S. Supreme Court To Hear Burlco Strip-Search Case Today

The lights were on late at the high court last night in advance of this morning´s arguments on the strip search case. (Photo by Jan Hefler)<br />
The lights were on late at the high court last night in advance of this morning's arguments on the strip search case. (Photo by Jan Hefler)

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments today about whether a person arrested for a nonviolent crime or a traffic violation can be legally strip-searched when brought into a local jail.  In recent years, Philadelphia, Camden County, Gloucester County and other jurisdictions have paid millions to settle class action lawsuits filed by inmates who say their Constitutional rights were violated when they were strip-searched.

The current case involves a strip search conducted at the Burlco Jail 6 years ago.  Albert Florence, a Bordentown man who is a car dealership manager, says he was subjected to a "disgusting" visual inspection after being arrested during a routine car stop.  A state trooper stopped his wife for speeding on I-295 South and when he did a motor vehicle check, discovered Albert Florence had an outstanding warrant for eluding police.

It was a clerical error - Florence had paid the fine two years earlier - and he carried paperwork with him to prove it in case he was stopped.  As an African American, he said he has been stopped several times in the past because he was racially profiled.

Florence was jailed for 6 days and strip-searched twice before the mistake was finally verified.  The high court today is being asked to consider whether anyone who is arrested, regardless of the circumstances, should be strip-searched.  In 1979, the high court said it is Constitutional to subject inmates to visual body cavity inspections after they receive visitors, to prevent contraband from being smuggled into a jail.  But since then, federal courts have interpreted the issue differently. 

The high court expects to settle the Constitutional issue for the land. 

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Written by Inquirer staff writer Jan Hefler, the Burlco Buzz blog covers breaking news in the the county, as well as its quirky characters, crime cases, politics, outdoor recreation and environment. Contact Jan at

Jan Hefler
Also on
letter icon Newsletter