Sunday, August 2, 2015

New Billboards May Be Banned; Old Ones Can Stay

Towns may ban billboards for aesthetic or safety reasons, a Third Circuit Court decided. But the existing ones may stay, if they have already been approved. The ruling could slow the growth of new electronic signs along the highway.

New Billboards May Be Banned; Old Ones Can Stay

0 comments
Though this billboard sings the city´s praises, the city could ban billboards, without infringing on free speech, a court has decided.
Though this billboard sings the city's praises, the city could ban billboards, without infringing on free speech, a court has decided.

Towns may ban billboards for aesthetic or safety reasons, a Third Circuit Court has decided.  But the existing ones may stay, if they have already been approved.

The ruling, issued this week, could slow down the growth of new electronic signs along the highway.   

The court dismissed an appeal filed by an advertiser who argued that a ban would infringe on free speech. 

Interstate Outdoor Advertising wanted to erect four billboards along Interstate 295 in Mount Laurel, but was denied permission by the zoning board.  The company said the Burlington County township's complete ban on billboards was unconstitutional.

Chris Norman, Mount Laurel's special counsel, said township officials adopted the ban after determining billboards are unsightly and a hazard to drivers.  Currently, there are only two billboards in the township - one that advertises the Iron Hill Brewery off Routes 38 and 73, and another one on a county road. Those billboards, he said, predated the town's 1988 sign ordinance.     

The Third Circuit Court agreed that the ban "clearly limits Interstate's commercial speech."  But the court said the First Amendment was trumped in this case by local governments' authority to regulate billboards. 

Interstate's lawyer says he plans to meet with his clients to discuss whether to file an appeal. 

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Written by Inquirer staff writer Jan Hefler, the Burlco Buzz blog covers breaking news in the the county, as well as its quirky characters, crime cases, politics, outdoor recreation and environment. Contact Jan at jhefler@phillynews.com.

Jan Hefler
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter