Sunday, August 30, 2015

Legal experts abuzz about court's decision on Lower Makefield farm

Legal experts are abuzz about a recent state Supreme Court decision that requires Lower Makefield to pay a farmer’s family nearly $6 million for condemning his land to build a golf course.

Legal experts abuzz about court's decision on Lower Makefield farm

0 comments

Legal experts are abuzz about a recent state Supreme Court decision that requires Lower Makefield to pay a farmer’s family nearly $6 million for condemning his land to build a golf course.

What’s the big deal? A jury was allowed to consider how much money developers like Toll Brothers would have paid for the seized property.

Before May’s decision, offers to buy land were barred from the equation of valuing property, according to David Snyder, a lawyer with Fox Rothschild.

Snyder wrote on the firm’s eminent domain blog that the decision was a “dramatic change” in the law. The Supreme Court’s decision said “there is no bright-line rule prohibiting” genuine offers from developers when considering a property’s fair market value. 

In the Lower Makefield case, the township condemned Chester Dalgewicz’s 166-acre farm in 1996 to build a golf course. The farmer had been in talks with developers about selling his land during that decade’s housing boom.   

The township offered the family $3.3 million for the farm. An independent review board valued the land at about $4 million. But the Dalgewicz family took the case to trial, claiming the land was worth much more considering what developers were willing to pay.

A lower court judge allowed a jury to factor in Toll Brothers’ $7 million offer as well as an $8 million bid from Pulte Homes. The jury awarded Dalgewicz $5.85 million.

The township disputed the jury’s award, taking the case all the way to the state Supreme Court, which in late May upheld the consideration of the developers’ offers.  

“The township took this property knowing the Dalgewiczs were going to sell it to a developer,” said Marvin Wilenzik, the attorney who represented the family. “The township knew damn well that the Dalgewicz’s would make a hell of a lot more money for it if they sold it to a developer.”

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

BucksInq  
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter