Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Andy By The Numbers

Where Andy Reid stands in NFL coaching history -- on the front line or the sideline?

30 comments

Andy By The Numbers

POSTED: Friday, January 7, 2011, 3:32 PM

Just finished a column for Sunday's paper about the match-up with the Packers. Part of the story deals with the 12-year history of Andy Reid in the postseason and with his place in coaching history.

I'm going to post this to hopefully prevent some needless e-mail on Sunday morning from readers who -- not you guys, naturally, other guys -- don't necessarily read all that carefully.

There are a bunch of statistical points to be made about Reid's head coaching career, most of them positive, but there is also this, quoting one passage of the column:

"...Among coaches without a championship to their names, only two in the 90-year history of the league have won more overall games (regular season and postseason) than Reid while managing fewer trips to a title game, which means zero. If Marty Schottenheimer and Chuck Knox did the least with the most, Reid is in danger of being included in that conversation if his career drags on without a big trophy."

Stop, stop. Stop screaming about Jeff Fisher and Bud Grant and all those guys. Read the paragraph.

Let's start with Reid's record. He has 128 overall wins now. This season alone, he moved past Dick Vermeil, Mike Ditka, Jim Mora and George Allen, among others. Reid is now the 24th winningest coach in league history. (Good luck to anyone who wants to catch Don Shula and his 347 wins. Bill Belichick is highest active coach with 177.)

How many coaches on the list above Reid have never won a championship? Six. Schottenheimer, Dan Reeves, Knox, Grant, Marv Levy and Fisher.

How many NFL title games did each lead his team(s) to? Reeves (4), Grant (4), Levy (4), Fisher (1), Schottenheimer (0), Knox (0).

So, how many coaches without a championship have won more games than Reid, but advanced to fewer title games? Two. Schottenheimer and Knox.

The other numbers associated with Reid's success are obvious and the Eagles don't mind tell you about them. During his 12-year tenure, the Eagles have made the playoffs nine times, with only Indianapolis (11) doing better in that stretch. He's one of only 11 head coaches in NFL history to coach at least 200 games and have a better than .600 winning percentage.

The Eagles have been damn good nearly every season -- no one denies it -- but there is that big dusty spot in the trophy case.

All right. One more to chew on before Sunday, and I'd be lying if I said I knew what this means, or if it means anything.

Reid has earned a reputation as a great game-planning coach, someone who takes information and can form a strategy that will win you games. If there is criticism, it is usually about in-game decision making (run/pass ratio, time management, etc.).

That would indicate that the Eagles should do well when they play a team for a second (or third) time in a season, and the planning and adjustments have some real history on which to be built, and previous losses can be turned into wins -- hopefully. Such is the case Sunday when the Eagles play the Packers, who beat them in the opener.

Well, during Reid's tenure, the Eagles have met up in the playoffs against a team that beat them in their last (or only) meeting of that regular season.

It happened in the 2000 season vs. the Giants; in 2001 vs. the Rams; in 2006 vs the Saints; and in 2009 vs. the Cowboys. The Eagles record in those games: 0-4.

There have been a total of 12 postseason games under Reid in which the Eagles have played a team they met at least once in the regular season (win or lose). Their record in those games: 5-7.

Sunday is the 13th. Maybe it will be a lucky one.

30 comments
Comments  (30)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:13 PM, 01/07/2011
    win a stinkin' super bowl then worry about how his numbers compare the greats.
    snakeplissken
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:21 PM, 01/07/2011
    Thanks for raining on my parade. One of the biggest arguments for getting rid of McNabb was to see if it was Reid or McNabb who couldn't come through in the clutch. I guess we'll see in the next few years.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:27 PM, 01/07/2011
    Andy Reid is a very good coach who plans everything to the "T." I don't know if it's after the first 15 plays or a dubious call that inevitably happens in-game, though, Reid seems to have problems, especially with the clock. Something ALWAYS
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:30 PM, 01/07/2011
    Instead of writing an entire article explaining one paragraph, you should have just edited the paragraph. And I think Reid’s biggest problem is consistency game-to-game.
    BZI
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:34 PM, 01/07/2011
    It's funny how these stats work. They looks great until you look at how lonely you are WITHOUT the super bowl. But then if we win one or two in the next 5 years and suddenly he would have won enough games to be in consideration as one of the best of all time. PLEASE win one soon!!!
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:27 PM, 01/07/2011
    It was the lethal combination of McNabb and Reid that resulted in no SB wins. We have seen both make the most mind numbing decisions imaginable. A good part of Reid's success was due to Jimmy Johnson's schemes and Dawk keeping them in the game by stifling lesser talented teams. It is sad that Reid can claim to be one of the best Eagles coaches of all time and still not have a SB win. That is testimony to this franchise having the lamest coaches in the history in the game. We deserve better.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:05 PM, 01/07/2011
    yea I agree eaglephanatic...guess who drafted Brian Dawkins ? NOT ANDY. IT was Ray rhodes. same with that pro-bowl middle linebacker Jeremiah trotter. Reid did not draft dawkins, trotter, bobby taylor, troy vincent , hugh douglas, and on and on...NONE OF THEM. He inherited alot of guys from Ray Rhodes and Jim Johnson coached them. You see how bad the defense has gotten with all-Reid picked teams. huge difference. The guy is over-rated and he throws it more then ANY COACH IN NFL HISTORY. that is why he has not won one even win one of the most dominant defenses of the time because 60-80% passing IS A STUPID IDEA THAT HAS NEVER WON A CHAMPIONSHIP IN ANY SEASON, IN ANY CITY, EVER. Until he is stripped of the playcalling and personnel decions he will NEVER WIN A SB. EVER.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:59 PM, 01/07/2011
    Andy By the Numbers: zero.
    Han Solo
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:41 PM, 01/07/2011
    Folks, we're not going to the Super Bowl. And if we should somehow stumble into it, we're not beating the Patriots. We have a subpar defense and our QB, as exciting as he can be, is hurt and has been shown the past few weeks as being confused against alternating blitzes. I'm not positive that the Pack will beat us; we're at home, and Rodgers is banged up too. But we're not going all the way. Hey, Andy, Marv Levy went to the Hall of Fame anyway. Maybe you can join him in the wannabe wing. Or, else, we can rebuild what used to be a powerful defense and try again next year.
    eman
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:41 AM, 01/08/2011
    Reid will bring a superbowl here. this team for the next 4-5 years is going to be very salty. They have just about everything in place to have a great run.
    stewartIV
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:51 PM, 01/07/2011
    ...arrrgh
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:08 PM, 01/07/2011
    Reid will never win anything, even if he coaches 20 more years, he
    CAN'T ADJUST DURING GAMES! If you can't adjust, you usually go home from the playoffs, like Reid has every year, title-less. You can't compare Reid to Levy or Bud Grant. Grant lost to Miami, Pittsburgh and Okland arguably 3 of the best AFC teams of the decade. Levy should of beat the Giants, if not for a Scott Norwood choke, and he
    went against the team of the decade in the 90s (Dallas) twice. While Reid lost to Tampa, Carolina, Rams, and Arizona, favored against all except the Rams, and of course the Superbowl loss to NE. I would group him where he belongs with Marty and Knox, "just good enough to lose."
    mikey48
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:21 PM, 01/07/2011
    Andy Reid is definitely a good coach. You can't take that away from him. If he were to ever leave the Eagles he would not have a problem getting another head coaching job. You can not have as many wins as he does in the NFL and not be a good coach. You just cant. Not over 12 years. The NFL is the NFL: professional football at the highest level.

    That being said, one of his achilles' heels is in-game adjustments. I think this is a microcosm of Andy Reid's career here in Philly and will probably result in him never leading the Eagles to a Super Bowl victory.

    He needs to take a step back, maybe a year or two off. Look at things without being the coach. I don't think he's ever adapted here as coach. He finds stop-gaps and and had a great defensive coordinator to prevent losing seasons, but I don't think he's made the adjustments season to season that can lead to a SB. Maybe pressure gets to him. It would make sense that he's better at gameplanning with more time to prepare. Bill Belichick went 5 or so years between head coaching stints- learned alot between those stints- and has been one of the best since 2000. Maybe Andy Reid could do the same. Will it happen? Probably not. So don't be surprised if he keeps repeating the close but no cigar routine for a long time to come.

    DegoPower
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:41 PM, 01/09/2011
    I agree with your closing of "close but no cigar." The reason we are close is Vick. No cigar because the rest of the WHOLE team (excluding the "skill" group) is mostly below NFL-average. We will not acquire enough high draft picks to fix the "D". We MIGHT fix the O-Line though. If....IF....that happens we might get to the Conference Championship game next year...with Vick OR Kolb. But still no Supe without some more studs on "D".
    TBear
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:31 PM, 01/07/2011
    Good article Bob! It certainly shows there's two sides to the statistics to all those Reid supporters that constantly bring them up. Unfotunately Reid values loyalty with no dissention over talent, that's why he has M.M. and S.M. as his coordinators. We all know how this will end folks. I wish I was wrong!


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3
About this blog
Bob Ford has been writing about Philadelphia sports since 1981, and is still trying to figure it all out. A former beat writer covering the Phillies and the 76ers, Ford became a general sports columnist for the Inquirer in 2003, following in and occasionally falling in the deep footsteps of Bill Lyon, Frank Dolson and many distinguished others. He comes to the Philly.com blogosphere after award-winning success as designer/editor of the fabulous Pen & Pencil Club softball blog. Likes: Palestra, inside-the-park home runs, sunny days. Dislikes: phony people, cloudy days, rewrites. Reach Bob at bford@phillynews.com.

Bob Ford Inquirer Sports Columnist
Philly.com Sports Videos
Blog archives:
Past Archives: