Wednesday, November 25, 2015

What to Watch For in NH GOP primary

Here are some factors to watch in assessing the meaning of the results in New Hampshire's GOP presidential primary today:

What to Watch For in NH GOP primary

Moderator Ken Chapman slides a voter´s ballot into a box at the Woodstock Town Hall in Woodstock, N.H., Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2012, during voting in the first-in-the-nation presidential primary,  (AP Photo / Matt Rourke)
Moderator Ken Chapman slides a voter's ballot into a box at the Woodstock Town Hall in Woodstock, N.H., Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2012, during voting in the first-in-the-nation presidential primary, (AP Photo / Matt Rourke)

MANCHESTER, N.H. – The storylines to watch as the returns come in Tuesday night in the New Hampshire Republican presidential primary are pretty straightforward, though when “real people,” also known as the voters, elbow aside the cud-chewing pundits and start sorting things out, strange things can and sometimes do happen.

 ROMNEY: Is it big enough?

 Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney went into Tuesday with a slightly melting but still substantial lead, and seemed poised to win by double digits. If that happens, the talk of Romney as the ultimate nominee should reach a crescendo and Republican establishment-types will continue rallying around him. A win would make Romney the first Republican candidate to win the first two nominating contests since 1976, when Iowa and New Hampshire cemented their places as the leadoff states. That’s impressive no matter what.

 But if Romney’s win seems unimpressive to the party and analysts after a few days of rough road, then the perception might persist that he is having a difficult time closing the sale with conservative activists and generating enthusiasm in the party. The largest Republican super-PAC, the Karl Rove-founded American Crossroads, released a memo Tuesday arguing that Romney has the best chance of becoming the nominee, despite the narrative that he is stuck at a “ceiling” of 25 percent support of the GOP electorate.

More coverage
Bunch: Romney riding wave
Baer: Newt pulls out stops
Hill: GOP plays to racial divide
Gallery: N.H. GOP primary
Full N.H. primary coverage
Specter: Dump Obama
N.H. voters: We’ll settle for Mitt
Tough night for Santorum
Next up: a tussle in S.C.

“With Romney, as opposed to virtually every other candidate in the GOP field this cycle, the difference is that his negatives (all candidates have them) are already widely known and built into his level of support,” wrote Jonathan Collegio, communicatiosn director for American Crossroads. “There is there is very little out there about Romney that Republican voters don’t already know that could significantly affect his support…That may well be an underlying reason why Republicans almost always nominate candidates who have run in previous elections.”

Romney ran for president and lost in 2008.

HUNTSMAN: Is the momentum real?

In the past few days, former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman has surged and he has a decent chance of passing libertarian icon (and Texas Rep.) Ron Paul for second place. He’s had the biggest buzz and the biggest crowds in the state, and New Hampshire voters, who tend to eschew social-issues conservatives, seem to like his moderate tone and stances on global warming, and support for civil unions for same-sex couples.

Huntsman, who left the governor’s office in Salt Lake City to accept an appointment as President Obama’s ambassador to China, won plaudits for pushing back on Romney’s attack against him for consorting with the socialist in chief. “Country first,” became his rallying cry. A second place showing here would be a boost, but how much of one? South Carolina is considerably more conservative than New Hampshire, and Huntsman spent all of his campaign time here. Would he have the infrastructure and chops to continue into Florida (Jan. 31) and beyond?

And if Paul finishes strong and pushes Huntsman down to third, would that make a difference?


Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum are in competition for third, or more likely fourth, place finish in New Hampshire – and the one who comes out on top would have an opportunity to argue he is the better candidate to unite the evangelical and social-conservative bloc in the party in the next contest, South Carolina, to try to stop Romney from locking down the nomination.

Santorum finished second, eight votes behind the winner, Romney, in Iowa where evangelical voters are a dominant majority of the electorate, but he has found that his staunch opposition to abortion rights and same-sex marriage has been less popular in New Hampshire, which has a strong tradition of economic conservatism combined a "live and let live" attitude on personal freedom.

Gingrich was damaged badly in Iowa with negative attacks on his record, but he has gained some traction with a populist critique of Romney's former career as a corporate takeover specialist at Bain Capital.


Unaffiliated voters can choose a ballot in either party’s primary and don’t have to change their registration to do so, unlike. In 2008, exit polls showed that 37 percent of voters in the GOP New Hampshire primary were independents; they were 42 percent in 2000, when John McCain defeated George W. Bush here.

If independents turn out in large numbers, analysts say that would probably be a good thing for Paul and Huntsman, who were drawing the most support from this bloc in pre-primary polls.


Inquirer Politics Writer
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Inquirer staff writer Thomas Fitzgerald blogs about national politics.

Reach Thomas at

Tom Fitzgerald
Thomas Fitzgerald Inquirer Politics Writer
Also on
letter icon Newsletter