Saturday, July 4, 2015

Sestak v. Toomey rematch would be a first

Pennsylvania has never had a rematch between major-party candidates for U.S. Senate in the 100-year history of direct election of senators, according to the University of Minnesota's Smart Politics.

Sestak v. Toomey rematch would be a first


If Democrat Joe Sestak wins his party’s primary and runs against incumbent Republican Sen. Pat Toomey in 2016, it would be the first rematch of major party candidates in Pennsylvania’s history of U.S. Senate elections, according to a review by the blog Smart Politics.

Pennsylvania has held 38 special and general elections for U.S. Senate since 1914, when the state began choosing senators based on direct popular vote. In that time, a defeated candidate has never sought and earned the right to take another shot at the victor, Smart Politics found. The data-driven blog is written by Eric Ostermeier, a researcher at the University of Minnesota’s Humphrey School of Public Affairs.

Ostermeier discovered that five minor party Pennsylvania U.S. Senate candidates have had rematches against the same opponent, but none of them got more than 5 percent of the vote: Socialist William Van Essen against Republican David Reed (1922, 1928), Van Essen against Republican James Davis (1930, 1932), Socialist Labor candidate Frank Knotek against Democrat Francis Myers (1944, 1950), Knotek against Republican Edward Martin (1946, 1952), and Socialist Labor candidate George Taylor against Republican Hugh Scott (1958, 1964).

Here is a link to the full report from Smart Politics.

Sestak Tuesday said he was exploring a run for Senate in 2016, bypassing the Democratic primary for governor in 2014. He raised $460,000 in the first three months of the year, according to federal campaign finance reports.

Sestak may not have a clear path in the 2016 primary, however. Pennsylvania politicos are already noting that Montgomery County Commission Chairman Josh Shapiro, Attorney General Kathleen Kane and Mayor Nutter, to name a few, may be looking to climb the ladder.


Inquirer Politics Writer
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Inquirer staff writer Thomas Fitzgerald blogs about national politics.

Reach Thomas at

Tom Fitzgerald
Thomas Fitzgerald Inquirer Politics Writer
Also on
letter icon Newsletter