Friday, July 31, 2015

Gingrich Says His Tiffany's Bling Bill "Private"

Presidential candidate Newt Gingrich (R) responded to questions about his half-million debt to Tiffany & Co., and stumbles in his first week of campaigning in Sunday appearance on CBS' "Face the Nation."

Gingrich Says His Tiffany's Bling Bill "Private"


Presidential candidate Newt Gingrich (R) said Sunday that there was nothing strange about his credit arrangement with luxury jeweler Tiffany & Co. that left him and his wife with a bill of up to a half-million dollars.

Gingrich stressed on CBS’ “Face the Nation” that the debt, reported five years ago by Callista Gingrich on a financial-disclosure form for federal employees, was for a no-interest revolving account that had been paid off. The form listed debt of $250,000 to $500,000.

“I am debt free,” Gingrich said. “If the U.S. government were as debt free as I am, everybody in America would be celebrating.

As host Bob Schieffer pressed for more details of the account, Gingrich said, “Go talk to Tiffany’s. It’s a standard, no-interest account.”

As for what he bought, Gingrich declined to say. “It’s my private life,” he said.

Gingrich also addressed criticism of his disastrous first week on the Republican presidential campaign trail.

That began with a firestorm ignited on NBC’s Meet the Press May 15, when Gingrich ripped the House-passed GOP budget written by Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, which proposes converting the federal health insurance for the elderly, Medicare, into a voucher program to reduce spening and save the program. On the NBC show, Gingrich dismissed the idea as “social engineering” and too “radical” to become law. When conservative pundits and voters rebelled, Gingrich quickly backtracked and even apologized to Ryan.

“I probably used unfortunate language…but my point was really a larger one: that neither party could impose on the American people something that they are deeply opposed to,” Gingrich said Sunday.  He added that the Ryan proposal on Medicare is a good starting point, and maybe just needs some tweaking, which he did not specify. “He and I are on the same side in that conversation,” Gingrich said. “Obama’s on the opposite side of the conversation.”

Inquirer Politics Writer
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Inquirer staff writer Thomas Fitzgerald blogs about national politics.

Reach Thomas at

Tom Fitzgerald
Thomas Fitzgerald Inquirer Politics Writer
Also on
letter icon Newsletter