Thursday, October 8, 2015

Americans support drones in law enforcement, with limits

Americans favor use of unmanned surveillance drones in U.S. law enforcement, but with limits, according to a survey by New Jersey's Monmouth University.

Americans support drones in law enforcement, with limits


Americans back the use of unmanned aerial surveillance drones in aspects of domestic law enforcement, but a majority favors requiring court orders before the vehicles can be deployed, according to a new Monmouth University Poll.

The public is less supportive of using armed drones, however, the poll finds.

Questioned about three potential U.S. law enforcement tasks for drones, 83 percent of respondents support the idea of using surveillance drones to help with search-and-rescue missions, and 62 percent favor deploying drones to help control illegal immigration on the nation’s borders. But only 21 percent support using drones to issue speeding tickets. (Surprised the number is that high.)

Forty-four percent say it’s OK to use armed drones in border protection, a significant drop from the majority supporting surveillance. But 52 percent say they would be fine with the use of drones in hostage situations.

“Support for the use of law enforcement drones in U.S. airspace has not changed in the past year, but this new poll shows there are significant caveats – for one, thee public overwhelmingly supports judicial oversight before drones are employed,” said Patrick Murray, director of the New Jersey-based Monmouth University Polling Institute.

More than three out of four Americans (76 percent) say that law enforcement should be required to get a warrant before deploying drones in any case.

The routine employment of law enforcement drones could violate privacy, and 2-in-3 Americans express some level of concern about that. Forty-nine percent say they very concerned and 20 percent somewhat concerned about protecting their own privacy if policing agencies started using unmanned drones with high-tech surveillance cameras and recording equipment.

Results of the survey are based on phone interviews with 1,012 U.S. adults, conducted July 25-30. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.


Inquirer Politics Writer
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Inquirer staff writer Thomas Fitzgerald blogs about national politics.

Reach Thomas at

Tom Fitzgerald
Thomas Fitzgerald Inquirer Politics Writer
Also on
letter icon Newsletter