Sunday, February 14, 2016

Specter continues to haunt Santorum

Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum had to explain again his support for ex-colleague Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter Sunday.

Specter continues to haunt Santorum


Rick Santorum, basing his Republican presidential campaign on the idea he is the purest conservative in the race, can’t seem to escape reminders of past entanglements with former Senate colleague (and moderate) Arlen Specter.

On Sunday, Santorum said that his support for Specter’s brief 1996 presidential campaign was a mistake that he wishes he could take back.

“I was his colleague in the United States Senate. He asked me to stand with him,” Santorum told host Jonathan Karl on ABC’s This Week. “That certainly wasn’t one of my prouder moments I look back on. But look, you know, you work together as a team for the state of Pennsylvania,” Santorum said. “I certainly knew that Arlen Specter was going nowhere. I certainly disagreed with a lot of things that he said.”

Santorum, a noted leader in the movement to restrict abortion access, was standing on the dais when Specter, then a moderate Republican who was pro-choice, announced his presidential bid in 1995.

 “I want to take abortion out of politics … and leave moral issues such as abortion to the conscience of the individual,” Specter said in that speech. “That is a matter to be decided by women, not by big government.”

Santorum said he owed Specter because his senior colleague had supported him in his successful 1994 Senate election. Supporting Specter, who later became a Democrat before losing his 2010 reelection race, “was something I look back on and wish I hadn’t done,” Santorum said Sunday.

In 2004, Santorum endorsed – and aggressively campaigned for – Specter in the Pennsylvania Republican primary, when the latter was challenged by the conservative former congressman Pat Toomey. Specter narrowly defeated Toomey then, and Santorum continues to take fire from the right for his role, undertaken at the behest of President George W. Bush.




Inquirer Politics Writer
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Inquirer staff writer Thomas Fitzgerald blogs about national politics.

Reach Thomas at

Tom Fitzgerald
Thomas Fitzgerald Inquirer Politics Writer
Also on
letter icon Newsletter