Thursday, February 11, 2016

There's a right way and a wrong way to combat right wing violence

There's a right way and a wrong way to combat right wing violence


There's a lot going on with this story that the Drudge Report has been hyping all day:

The Department of Homeland Security is warning law enforcement officials about a rise in "rightwing extremist activity," saying the economic recession, the election of America's first black president and the return of a few disgruntled war veterans could swell the ranks of white-power militias.

A footnote attached to the report by the Homeland Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis defines "rightwing extremism in the United States" as including not just racist or hate groups, but also groups that reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority.

"It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single-issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration," the warning says.

Normally I hate the phrase "on one hand, on the other hand," but here goes....

On one hand, I've been highly critical here when Homeland Security under the Bush administration appeared to be spying on certain peace groups, especially when the evidence seemed pretty clear that these groups were non-violent. And the same holds true when the situation is reversed -- the government shouldn't be spying or infiltrating groups that want to peacefully protest issues such as immigration and abortion. Monitor public websites, sure, and follow up on tips and other traditional evidence of possible violence -- but use common sense.

On the other hand, you have to have your head in the sand not to be worried about a potential rising tide of right-wing violence, as evidenced already by the Pittsburgh cop-killing spree. But this is something we ALL need to monitor -- a more assertive media (that needs to question the toxic role of other media), for sure -- and also the vast majority of decent citizens with conservative views. In other words, there are plenty of ways to fight violence that don't involve violating people's civil liberties. So Homeland Security should tread very lightly here.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Will Bunch
Also on
letter icon Newsletter