Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
share
email
font size
options
 
Tuesday, March 17, 2009

 

If you're at work and reading this blog post on the computer, it may not be for you.

As you know, I've been avidly following the swelling discussion about the future of news and information in America. While generally my lot is cast with the radical reformers -- who say the newspaper model is broken and the world is waiting for what comes next -- over the curmudgeons, there is one area where I think the reformers tend to fall short.

They...we, whatever...forget that not everyone in American society is like them (or us). That is to say, walking around 14 hours a day with a computer screen practicially bolted to front of their forehead. Millions of people live and work that way -- sure,  pointy-headed elitists (cue "smiley face") like journalists or college professors but also business people, engineers, executive assistants, customer service reps, etc., etc. 

On the other hand, millions of workers either aren't on a computer at all -- construction workers, landscapers -- or only part-time (like cops, who now have computers in their patrol cars but may not have Internet access) and not in the same time-wasting fashion as the stereotypical cubicle inmate. Yet their interest in -- and need for -- news and information is every bit intense, which is why they still gravitate toward the print medium.

This comes up a lot when we talk about the future of the Philadelphia Daily News -- and it should. I stumbled recently across something I wrote a couple of years ago (no link) that said: 

The Daily News, in particular, had survived rough times by appealing largely to a niche that was otherwise largely ignored—the bulk of our readers were urban, older, and working class, and we had a higher percentage of African American readers than any other big-city paper in the nation. For example, a 2007 survey found that 28.5 percent of our readers are “blue collar” – higher than the overall city (21.5 percent) and much higher than the rival Inquirer (18.5 percent). What’s more, Daily News readers lived in a city that—despite some award-winning investigative reporting—was still run by a Democratic political machine that was just as “corrupt and contented” as in 1904, when muckraker Lincoln Steffens famously described Philadelphia with those words. How much more amok would Philly’s sleazy politicians run if one of the two papers was shut down, or if more investigative reporting slots were slashed?

My point isn't that blue-collar or urban Philadelphians aren't computer users or even computer-savvy -- many of them are, although there is still much work ahead to close the digitial divide in this city and across America. But the nature of their work and their commuting routine may be such that they're still better served by a print product than a screaming 24/7 Web site. 

That's why I was interested to see the editor of the Spanish-language publication El Diario made this exact same point over the weekend (h/t Romenesko):

 

 ALBERTO VOURVOULIAS: ....El Diario knows its readership, and we have a readership that on the one hand involves Latinos in the New York/New Jersey area, recent immigrants as well as people who have been here for several generations, and also our audience is very much a working-class/lower-middle-class audience. We feel that the information we provide to them is essential information that really is most effectively given through a newspaper form rather than through other media.

BROOKE GLADSTONE: And why is that?

ALBERTO VOURVOULIAS: Many of our readers don't have desk jobs, which means they don't spend all day in front of a monitor checking up on websites to see what the latest news is. And, therefore, they take the paper into the office, share it with the people they work with, take it home at night and share it with their families.

I'm trying to point out the unique challenge of preserving journalism and the vital exchange of public information in a Rust Belt city like Philadelphia. A Web-only newspaper might work in the home city of Microsoft, Amazon.com, and Starbucks. In the home city of....lots of civil servants? Not as much. I agree that printed news is a little like dirty bathwater these days, but you can't throw the baby -- a unique, non-transferable readership -- out with bathwater.

Posted by Will Bunch @ 12:52 PM  Permalink | 30 comments
Comments   
Posted 01:11 PM, 03/17/2009
Mr. Smith
I find it interesting that Will and his cut-n-paste buddy used the terms “essential information” and “needed information” to describe their work product. The Daily News does not provide “needed information”, it provides amusement. It is entertainment for those who derive pleasure from observing the newspaper’s opinions, and from hearing about the suffering and malfeasance of others. It does NOT provide “essential information” that anyone ever uses to make important real-life decisions. Stop deluding yourself, and dance for us!
Posted 01:14 PM, 03/17/2009
bpphilly
Where'd you get the TPSSSSSSSS action figure, Will?
Posted 01:14 PM, 03/17/2009
ET
I'm no techie but can't you get the news from your cell phone these days?
Posted 01:19 PM, 03/17/2009
will
Yes, and that's something we need to do A LOT better. We're still struggling with 1990s technology.
Posted 01:29 PM, 03/17/2009
jmc
"digital divide": I thinks Will has found another right buried in that ol' Constitution. I do wonder, since your breaking down readership, how many read the DN just for the sports section? It's the best part of the paper and gets good promotion on Comcast with Daily News Live and other sports shows.
Posted 01:56 PM, 03/17/2009
chasing history
I am all for newspapers and would agree that people that get their information from a newspaper are more informed than people who get it from TV or the internet. But I also understand and admit that technology has changed the way we get our news. While I subscribe to the Inky, I rarely read the actual paper since I can read the sections I want online. All that being said, I cannot understand why one ownership group continues to put out two newspapers that share about 75% of the content. I never have, nor ever will, read the DN for News. I have said it before and never got a response, but combine the best of the Inky and the DN and you can make a profit.
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
Posted 02:08 PM, 03/17/2009
E.Plebnista
Ah, the marginalized minority, always living two centuries (or more) behind... Did any of Americans' "rights" exist in civil society BEFORE the Constitution enshrined them as "truths we hold to be self-evident?" Not for most of humanity. America is a vibrant, living, breathing country - not the calcified shell the marginalized minority wants to make it. In fact, the document itself acknowledges additional rights - leaving them to the states... or to the people. If the marginalized minority wasn't so determined to Hate Americans First, they might accept that "government of the people, by the people and for the people" can determine more rights than those set down over two hundred years ago by men who openly acknowledged that they enshrined just a limited set. But they can't let the hate go...
Posted 02:11 PM, 03/17/2009
A Friend
Will, I get much of my financial & political news online at work during the day. However, when I get home in the evening, I enjoy sitting with a glass of wine and reading the Inqy from cover to cover. We devour the weekend editions. I was raised reading a hardcopy daily newspaper. We pay approx $200/yr for 7 day delivery or approx .55 cents per day. I'd be extremely disappointed if the hardcopy Inqy went away. If blue-collar, urban readership is your hardcopy niche, then you guys need to figure out how to maximize that readership.
Comment removed.
Posted 02:13 PM, 03/17/2009
Talking Point Stooge
"In fact, the document itself acknowledges additional rights - leaving them to the states... or to the people" - and that is why rights not explicitely expressed in the Constitution - like say privacy or health care - should be - short a Constitutional Ammendment - with the States to decide. I am not against people's rights I just want to hold the Federal Government in check and not have them run my life and tax me to pay for all these rights they sudenly decide people have.
Posted 02:37 PM, 03/17/2009
legatus
"In fact, the document itself acknowledges additional rights - leaving them to the states.....they might accept that 'government of the people, by the people and for the people' can determine more rights than those set down over two hundred years ago by men who openly acknowledged that they enshrined just a limited set." The Constitution does not grant or determine rights. Rather, it starts with the assumption that these rights exist, and serves to limit the government's ability to infringe upon them.
Posted 02:48 PM, 03/17/2009
Echo
Will, your argument fails because you refuse to acknowledge this simple fact: the blue collar newspaper reader, the one who you contend "needs" a newspaper and who would otherwise, it seems, go unenlightened by your wisdom, would simply switch over to the Inquirer if the DN were to fold. While the tone might be different, the two papers are fungible for this purpose, like it or not.
Posted 02:50 PM, 03/17/2009
COskier
Yeah - it really stinks not having ink on my hands, piles of paper to recycle, not destroying hundreds of square miles of forest each year, and not having to pay $200 per year. And also it stinks that I can do all that the second I wake up in the morning. It's a terrible thing keeping up with everything in Philly even though I live in Colorado. When I read a story and want more info, having the world at my fingertips is just such an inconvenience. Not saying there shouldn't be print for people who want it - but why would you want it if you have a computer?
Posted 02:57 PM, 03/17/2009
Talking Point Stooge
"and not in the same time-wasting fashion as the stereotypical cubicle inmate." Nice to know Will thinks so highly of his blog readers. Feel the love.
Posted 03:04 PM, 03/17/2009
Talking Point Stooge
Bunch, did Ed Wuerst twitter you?
Posted 03:05 PM, 03/17/2009
Talking Point Stooge
***snip***Posted by bpphilly 01:14 PM, 03/17/2009 Where'd you get the TPSSSSSSSS action figure, Will?***snip*** I don't appreciate that
Posted 04:06 PM, 03/17/2009
bpphilly
"Bwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaccccccckkkkkkk, another ART shines a light on his obsession with me." My apologies for the illogical and homoerotic post.
Posted 04:37 PM, 03/17/2009
Domenic
Hey Will, great job that you "old media" did in "print" with the investigations of crooked (Demoratic) politicians in this city. Real good job. The only problem is that you endorsed them each and every time that they came up for re-election because they were going up against Nazi...er, I mean Republicans. You and yours are enablers at the least and accomplices at worst...
Comment removed.
Posted 05:18 PM, 03/17/2009
bird11
"Yet their interest in -- and need for -- news and information is every bit intense" - and that is why they read the free Metro paper on the bus and at the jobsite. What important news did they miss from the DN today that Jenna Jameson is now a MILF???
Posted 05:23 PM, 03/17/2009
CleanupPhilly
It's not true that a web-only paper works only in the high tech corridors where the big tech companies reside. The Seattle Post Intelligencer just went web only today, and they are described as "blue collar, rabble rousers" who wrote for the miners and commercial fishermen in the Pacific Northwest. Sounds just like the DN. Here's the link: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-seattle-p-i17-2009mar17,0,5714395.story
Posted 05:32 PM, 03/17/2009
CleanupPhilly
That Bunch only describes Philly as "rust belt" really shows how out of date the perception of who lives in Philly and who buys the papers and goes online to read it really is. The hot industries in Philly are not "rust belt." I don't work in a "rust belt" industry. It's a lot like Seattle, where there once were just loggers, fishermen, and miners reading the now online-only Seattle P-I, but now there are techies in the variety of industries in Seattle as a Pacific Rim/Northwest hub. Seattle is one of the largest ports in the US for everything coming into the US. Philly is not dead. Philly is not rusting. But the journalists and politicians certainly are. Why kill trees just to make the old timers happy and employ too many people to do the same thing you can do with a few? Why have a huge city government to support the health and pension plan of the retirees when you can have smaller, less costly government, and expect people to not have massive pensions and health insurance with no copays? There's going to be downsizing and right sizing, and there's no going backwards in time. It seems like the push to get the city to downsize and collect things like overdue property taxes won't happen until the paper downsizes and starts doing things the new cost saving way that reflects how people live now. It's the old timers on the paper who fight every change in the city without really thinking.
Posted 05:38 PM, 03/17/2009
CleanupPhilly
Did Will Bunch ever do a piece on the half a billion in uncollected property taxes? Did he ever do a piece on why the Sheriff is only selling properties in the worst areas not the best places that people want to buy and build? Did he ever investigate the office that is responsible for getting the city's revenue? Nope. Maybe its because the Sheriff was a really big advertiser, but now Nutter is putting the advertising of those sales online, at a significant cost savings. Now the paper will hopefully be free to publish the kind of investigative reporting of local issues that will cause me to believe in them as a vital contributor to change in the city. It took the new technology to shake things up. If Bunch was savvy, he'd have a proposal as to how the DN could publish sheriff sales online for the city at a cost savings, and end up keeping at least some of that advertising revenue for the online version.
Posted 08:02 PM, 03/17/2009
ET
I can't believe no one blamed Bush for the predicament that the newspaper organizations find themselves confronting.
Posted 08:17 PM, 03/17/2009
montani semper liberi
Will, that was pathetic. This is an evolution, not of your precious news biz, but of democracy itself. Democracy is the only reason you're profession exists anyway, so don't be a drag.
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
Posted 09:51 PM, 03/17/2009
bpphilly
"How much more amok would Philly’s sleazy politicians run if one of the two papers was shut down, or if more investigative reporting slots were slashed?" Well, dope...on "your watch" we've had: Wilson Goode, John Street, Rick Mariano, Wilson Goode Jr & Lateefah (sp?), Fast Eddy Rendell and Vince Fumo, to name a few. Yeah, I guess any reasonable person would credit "the real heros--journalists" for really digging deep into the heart of political corruption in Philadelphia and exposing it all for the world to see. Moron.
About Will Bunch
Will's book: Learn about it here and purchase it here.

Will Bunch, a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News, blogs about his obsessions, including national and local politics and world affairs, the media, pop music, the Philadelphia Phillies, soccer and other sports, not necessarily in that order.

E-mail Will by clicking here.

PLEASE COMMENT WITH PASSION...

...but not with racial slurs, potentially libelous allegations, obscenities or other juvenile noise. Such comments will, at our discretion, be deleted in their entirety, and repeat offenders will be blocked from commenting. ALSO: Any commenter advocating killing any government official will be immediately banned.

Thanks.

Blog Roll
Philly/National
 
Atrios
 
Kiko's House
 
Suburban Guerilla
 
Booman Tribune
 
All-Spin Zone
 
Philly (Dragonballyee)
 
Afro-Netizen
 
Rowhouse Logic
 
MyDD
 
Bad Attitudes
 
Billmon
 
iFlipFlop
 
CorrenteWire
 
upyernoz
 
Tattered Coat
 
Fables of the Reconstruction
 
Slacktivist
Philly
 
Citizen Mom
 
The Next Mayor
 
Philly Future
 
Philadelphia Will Do
 
Philebrity
 
Young Philly Politics
 
Phillyblog
 
Welcome to Phillyville
 
Phawker
 
A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
 
Keystone Blog
 
Philadelphia - America's Hometown
 
BlankBaby
 
Above Average Jane
 
Phillyist
 
Metroblogging Philadelphia
 
The Clog
Politics
 
Josh Marshall
 
Daily Kos
 
Juan Cole
 
Oliver Willis
 
Andy Borowitz
 
War and Piece
 
Wonkette
 
BuzzFlash
 
Raw Story
 
Cursor
 
Crooks and Liars
 
Swing State Project
 
Kevin Drum
 
Talk Left
 
AmericaBlog
 
Hullabaloo
 
Mad Kane
 
Think Progress
 
Jesus' General
 
The Carpetbagger Report
 
Majikthise
 
Echidne of the Snakes
 
David Sirota
 
Glenn Greenwald
 
TBogg
 
Fire Dog Lake
 
Taylor Marsh
 
Matthew Yglesias
 
Jon Swift
 
Drudge Report
Sports
 
Beer Leaguer
 
The 700 Level
 
Dick Polman
 
Balls, Sticks and Stuff
 
Shallow Center
 
Philling Station
 
Phillies Nation
 
A Citizen's Blog
 
The Good Phight
Media
 
Romenesko
 
Editor and Publisher
 
Pressthink
 
Buzzmachine
 
The Inksniffer
 
Media Bloodhound
 
Eat the Press
 
Mickey Kaus
 
Media (Huffington Post)
If you must
 
Blinq
 
The Corner
 
Instapundit
 
Andrew Sullivan
 
Free Republic
 
James Taranto
 
Blonde Sagacity
 
ScrappleFace
 
Blogorrhea