Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Tuesday, June 18, 2013

The Taserification of America

140 comments

The Taserification of America

POSTED: Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 12:22 AM

 

Unless you've been living in a Waziristan cave for the last 24 years, you've heard about the unfortunate misdemeanor-breaking dude who got Tasered at a Phillies game at Citizens Bank Park last night. My computer screen here in Center City went all a-Twitter about it even before all the electrons had even stopped flowing through 17-year-old suburban high school senior Steve Consalvi.

My gut instinct when I first learned of it was the same as I feel about it a day later: That while it wasn't exactly a Rodney King affair, clearly the officer had used excessive force. I've been watching baseball games for more than 40 years, and the drills is always the same. The fan isn't trying to do harm, just get attention; it used to be that the TV cameras never even showed a field-jumper for exactly that reason, back before ESPN needed an endless stream of fodder for its "Top 10 Plays."

People forget that the whole justification for police to get Tasers in the first place was to subdue potentially violent suspects in cases in the past in which they might have been tempted to use lethal force. But the notion that the cops would have pulled a gun and shot 17-year-old field jumper Steve Consalvi is absurd, which means the rationale for tasing him is...what? There's something oddly funny about zapping a fellow human for some reason, but Tasers are no joke to the loved ones of the estimated 50 people who died because of their use.

Consalvi didn't have the risk factors of most of those killed or injured -- he is young, health, and wasn't drunk or on drugs. But he still -- while committing a misdemeanor, let's remember -- was subjected to the brief, intense pain of 50,000 volts of electricty. There was a simpler, quainter time when causing pain to another person was called...violence.

I guess that quaint time was America before 9/11 -- after which for some reason we lost all sense of proportionality on how to respond to various levels of wrongdoing. After my low-key blog suggestion that Tasering a mildly lawbreaking fan wasn't a great idea, I got an email from a reader. He said, in part: "Were you there last night? I was. Idiots like that are unpredictable at best! The days of “Morgana (sic) the kissing bandit” are gone. We live in a post 911 world." I don't mean to be harsh to the emailer -- he actually made some decent points about security entering Citizens Bank Park.

But I also had to wonder: Must we see every single act of wrongdoing, even minor ones, through the prism of 9/11? Is a fan running on a field in the same ballpark with killing nearly 3,000 people? What has happened to us in this country. Did anyone call for stun-gunning "Morganna the kissing bandit" in the 1970s because we lived in "a post-JFK assassination world" and that maybe she had a concealed weapon inside of those, um. concealed weapons. Of course not. Americans have changed..and not for the better.

Make no mistake -- the 9/11 attacks were the most cowardly acts of pure evil ever committed on U.S. soil -- but the American ideals of civil liberties should be so sacrosanct they should not have been unduly violated even for the people who planned and executed 9/11, but of course they were at Guantanamo and with the John Yoo-justified torture regime that was expanded to many people who had nothing to do with 9/11 and eventually to people who were innocent of any crime altogether.

But even more damaging is the way that attitude -- that any kind of lawbreaking or even potential lawbreaking requires the harshest possible response, with no regard to more than 200 years of momentum toward basic civil liberties and human rights -- is filtering down to other aspects of American life. Exhibit A is what's happening in Arizona.

Let's be honest -- although there are some very bad apples scattered in there, the vast majority of undocumented immigrants are the Steve Consalvis of the American political debate. They've jumped over a fence and are running around on the field of national economy, and just like Consalvi they've broken a law but also aren't a threat to cause serious injury (especially with studies that show undocumented migrants have a low crime rate and tend to even pay more in taxes than they get back in services).

The response from the majority of Arizonans and many Americans is no longer to work toward a mature solution like real immigration reform that would view these humans as what the pre-soul-dead Sen. John McCain of the mid-2000s once called "God's children," but to use a totalitarian-tinged "papers please" brand of racial profiling in order to round up as many of these "illegals" (Note: actions are "illegal," not people -- sad that that even needs to be spelled out in 2010) as possible, even separating them from their children. The chief offender is Phoenix's "Sheriff Joe" Arpaio, who makes his predominately Latino inmate population swelter in a brutal tent city in the pink underwear he issues them. Many of his inmates would probably prefer to be tased.

And when you voted for change in 2008, you thought you were ushering in a presidency of Barack Obama, not the era of Draco, the Greek lawgiver.

Which brings us to Times Square and the failed car bombing. This is the second time in less than a year that a young man apparently inspired by some warped brand of Islamic extremism attempted attacks that would kill a large number of Americans. It's alarming and upsetting that anyone is trying -- however ineptly -- to kill so many innocent people. However, our current draconian rules of political discourse practically prevent us from even suggesting that these attacks be looked at as not quite exactly the same thing as 9/11, which after all was a well-planned attack with 19 trained perpetrators.

The failed Times Square car bombing and the failed airplane underwear bomber over Detroit were poorly planned events by young, naive individuals that, even combined, did not harm or kill a single individual; they were quite serious crimes nonetheless -- and they were both handled and properly investigated with remarkable skill and speed by the law-enforcement structures we already have in place -- that is, police and federal law-enforcement like the FBI -- who followed normal procedures, all applicable laws, and honored the U.S. Constitution. We also worked cooperatively with a foreign power with whom we've sometimes had a rocky relationship -- Pakistan -- to round up additional suspects in the Times Square case.

And the response of some of our top political leaders today has not congratulatory toward good police work or a criminal justice system that at times can still be the envy of the world --  but rather anger and disappointment...that the suspect's Constitutional rights were not violated. Even though Faisal Shahzad is a naturalized American citizen accused of felony crimes under U.S. law, some lawmakers were furious that authorities followed the law and read Shahzad his Miranda rights regarding self-incrimination (which hasn't stopped him from a confession or providing information, by the way).

One of those critics, of course, was John McCain, who said Mirandizing Shahzad "would be a serious mistake...at least until we find out as much information we have." Ironically, it fell upon right-wing media icon Glenn Beck to point out that the Times Square case was no time to "shred the Constitution." The main point here is a rather obvious -- when an anything-for-ratings entertainer like Beck is the voice of reason, then democracy is rolling seriously off the rails.

But this is increasingly who we are in 2010 -- an unforgiving nation where you can be zapped with 50,000 volts for a minor transgression, where you might be stopped on an Arizona street corner for having brown skin or speaking with the wrong kind of accent, and where citizens who are accused but not convicted of a crime are no longer all equal under the law. It is a nation where we are suddenly all Steve Consalvi every time we get up from our seats of conformity, never knowing where a new shock to our system might come from.

Call it a "post 911 world" if you want, but I would call it the slow, sad Taserification of America. At least on the green grass of left field in South Philadelphia, it was all out in the open for a change, for all of us to see.

Will Bunch @ 12:22 AM  Permalink | 140 comments
140 comments
Comments  (140)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:49 AM, 05/05/2010
    Oh boy Will, I'm sure the trolls will be ready to taze you after this one... Ironic how eager they are to taze a 17 year old but worship the greedheads who destroyed the world economy and undoubtedly did more harm to Americans than that boy did.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:17 AM, 05/05/2010
    The right wingers of today are the Tories of two hundred and fifty years ago.
    SteveMG
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:17 AM, 05/05/2010
    Will when you finally read the bill please indicate where it says you can question anyone for any reason, it is ont in there. the person has to be stopped on a seperate offense before asking about citizenships status. And if you listen to anything Becks says on his programs it is follow the constitution, and the Shazad is a natralized citizen and desirves tha same rights the police did an admirable job in tracking him. The police work for underwear bomber was terrible. he made on the plane and was only stopped by the passengers. and the young man that got zapped got what he wanted, his youtube moment. would you rather the cop chase him and then whack the kid with his batton to subdue him, I think that would have more a of a negative image than the taser.
    jmn1209
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:38 AM, 05/05/2010
    There's no irony in the disparity between Beck and McCain. Beck, as I understand it, honors the Constitution. McCain, on the other habd, is in the United States Senate, and those folks, for the most part, forgot the Constitution 150 years ago.
    Mark Glaeser
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:37 AM, 05/05/2010
    Will: Without commenting on the larger issues you raise, there is a rational rationale for the officer's actions: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/baseball/news/2002/09/19/royals_whitesox_ap/
    NJSmith
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:42 AM, 05/05/2010
    Although I find this post to be thoughtful, I continue to be saddened by the way Will and most liberals see America as just an "unforgiving nation" and where citizens accused of breaking the law are "no longer equal under the law". People on the right see this nation as truly great, an exception, that has allowed its citizens to achieve the greatest level of prosperity in history. I am saddened by the way they only see the problems with law enforcement rather than realizing that police officers risk their lives to protect innocent people and make the best decisions they can at the moment. I am saddened that Will, and most liberals, continue to apologize for people like the underwear bomber and Times Square bomber by saying by saying these crimes were "not quite exactly the same thing as 9/11" for the simple reason that they were unsuccessful. Instead they just complain (on this post and 24/7 on NPR) that "Americans have changed.. and not for the better". Wrong.... The people who have changed are the people that think the problem of a kid running on the field isn't with the kid but with law enforcement, and that we need the government to take care of us by providing health insurance. THAT is the mindset that has changed- can you name another time in history when Obamacare would not have been thought of as an abysmal growth of the federal govt? THAT is the mindset that has changed.
    Bud Fox
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:44 AM, 05/05/2010
    "But this is increasingly who we are in 2010 -- an unforgiving nation - similar to those who have never forgiven the nation for its past?
    AngryWhiteMale
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:14 AM, 05/05/2010
    Tasers are used end conflicts in a non-violent manner and eliminate the need for a physical confrontation with police and those who are breaking the law in a quick manner. I love how this is now being spun by people as the real issue is not the fact this moron ran onto the field, and broke a law, it is the cop who is now seen as the culprit for doing his job - catching someone who broke the law.
    reddog44
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:37 AM, 05/05/2010
    Will: You say it's just a fan running on the field, and it was just that. However Muhammed Atta and the gang looked pretty much like ordinary airline passengers on 9/11. Saying we can be over zealous in a post 9/11 world is an opinion formed from hindsight. You know now the fan on the field was a goofy 17 year old kid, but did you know it while it was happening? Do the police have the luxury to get all the facts before acting on something like that? Your passing it off as an overreaction, but you would be the first one to rail against the authorities if they showed restraint and that 17 year old kid turned out to be another Muhammed Atta.
    jmc
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:40 AM, 05/05/2010
    Oh, and nice job mixing John Yoo into another column. Every news story should have a little Yoo in it.
    jmc
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:48 AM, 05/05/2010
    "You know now the fan on the field was a goofy 17 year old kid, but did you know it while it was happening?" JMC, I think from a passing glance the police could have noticed he was a goofy kid. Past that, if he were a terrorist, he was already in CBP and could have caused damage in the stands. Going onto the field would have put him away from the dense population fo the stands.
    RG
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:04 AM, 05/05/2010
    Wow! Because Atta looked like any passenger, the kid on the CBP field could have been a terrorist. It must be scary to live in jmc's world.
    Talking point sleuth
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:08 AM, 05/05/2010
    In fact, I think that the cops should tase each and ever fan that even shows up at the park. I mean you never know. All of those fans might look ordinary - but each and every one could be a Mohammad Atta, hiding a dirty bomb. If we just tase each and every fan, we know that we'll be safe. jmc will be able to sleep easier. I mean do the police have the luxury of getting all the facts on each and every fan before they are allowed into the stadium?
    Talking point sleuth
  • Comment removed.


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  | 
About this blog
Will Bunch, a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News, blogs about his obsessions, including national and local politics and world affairs, the media, pop music, the Philadelphia Phillies, soccer and other sports, not necessarily in that order.

PLEASE COMMENT WITH PASSION...

...but not with racial slurs, potentially libelous allegations, obscenities or other juvenile noise. Such comments will, at our discretion, be deleted in their entirety, and repeat offenders will be blocked from commenting. ALSO: Any commenter advocating killing any government official will be immediately banned.

Reach Will at bunchw@phillynews.com.

Will Bunch
Blog archives:
Past Archives:
Blog Roll