
I've been thinking a lot lately about the public's right to know in the Internet age -- people have always had a right to public records including things like home ownership (including mortgage details), campaign contributions, public gun-carrying permits, etc., but with the Web it's much easier for anyone to publish that information and quickly disseminate it to a large number of people. This has freaked a lot of people out, but my general response is...too bad! Public records are critical to a free and open society, and better technology does not change that. If someone uses public information to harass somebody -- say, for supporting a political candidate or a cause -- than that person doing the harassment is breaking the law, and should be arrested..
This issue has come up a lot lately, most recently to some degree with the case of people protesting outside the homes of wealthy AIG executives. Again, my feeling is that it depends on the conduct. I have no problem with people staying on a public street outside someone's home and conducting a peaceful protest. People have the right in America to travel freely on public roads, take photos from them, even of other people's homes (I seriously don't understand the fuss over Google Street View) and they have the right to make comments or ask questions of people in public places. It would be hypocritical of me to believe otherwise, since my job as journalist has often involved these tasks -- ringing someone's doorbell, for example, when they won't respond to phone calls for an important article involving them or their business.
Which brings us to the case of Bill O'Reilly. The Fox News host has this strange love-hate relationship with stalking. He goes to great lengths to get confrontational video of people -- frequently of other journalists -- who've disagreed with him or offended his sensibilities in some way. His most recent target is a blogger named Amanda Terkel who works for the Center for American Progress in Washington. Without ever contacting Terkel to see if she'd be willing to do a normal interview, O'Reilly sent a crew out to confront her on a public street -- which I assume makes for livelier TV footage. To repeat, I would have no problem with O'Reilly's crew a) waiting outside her office in D.C. as she left work or b) even ringing her doorbell at home to ask if she would agree to an interview, unnecessary as that would have been. Instead, this is what O'Reilly's crew did:
– The Stalking: Watters and his camera man accosted me at approximately 3:45 p.m. on Saturday, March 21, in Winchester, VA, which is a two-hour drive from Washington, DC. My friend and I were in this small town for a short weekend vacation and had told no one about where we were going. I can only infer that the two men staked out my apartment and then followed me for two hours. Looking back, my friend and I remember seeing their tan SUV following us for much of the trip.
That's not journalism -- that's just creepy. I'm not an authority on stalking laws, but it may not even be legal. And by conflating his bizarre TV shock practices with real journalism, he does a lot of collateral damage to the public's right to know. Sometimes I wonder if Keith Olbermann goes to this well a tad too often, but tonight I don't think there's any question that stalker Bill O'Reilly is the...worst...person...in...the..world!
You're just mad because nobody cares about your book. Go cling to a bible, bitter Billy Bunch. beeron
Will, only one of your Wingnut commentators has spoke up so far, and even he didn't have the guts to defend O'Reilly. jeepster4
Many self-identified Republicans cannot stand O'Reilly or Limbaugh or the religious right projecting the "message" of the party. The old ideals of fiscal responsibility and self-determination have been utterly subsumed by crazy rhetoric. It's a shame that those of us who are good, hard-working people with reasonable and rational viewpoints get lumped in with these idiots anytime we disagree with Pelosi or Frank or the President. BlairW
Comment removed.
Comment removed.- Yeah, you never saw anything like that on 60 minutes...oh wait. Ms. Terkel should realize if she wants to shoot spitballs from behind her computer, that her target may have a bazooka. jmc
Comment removed.
What a shame. Really. Boo hoo. It would obviously be ok if she was an AIG executive instead of a liberal blogger. jwad56- "...that her target may have a bazooka." . . . Or worse, a loofah.
- "It would obviously be ok if she was an AIG executive instead of a liberal blogger." . . . . . . . Has any AIG exec been critical of FoxNews?
Hmmm -- investigative news reporters follow people all the time, catching them at inopportune times. Could it be, Willy Bunch, that you are upset that now that treatment has been extended to liberal "bloggers"?? And "Worst person in the world"... Right. Osama Bin Laden, Charles Manson, Bernie Madoff, Hugo Chavez, Barnie Frank, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, the governor of NY. I just named 6 people right off the top of my head who are much worse people then Bill O'Reilly. Again, success makes people jealous. Personally, I think Bill is a pompous a**, but he seems to draw a certain crowd, kind of like an anti-Howard Stern. IggleFan68
". . . . . Has any AIG exec been critical of FoxNews?".....has the Inky/DN been critical of anything Obama has done? What bias? E Plebnista- "investigative news reporters follow people all the time, catching them at inopportune times." . . . . . . Iggle, that's a fair point, but what's so newsworthy in following a blogger to Winchester and ambushing her on the street with a rhetorical question? Did you learn anything you couldn't have known otherwise?
Comment removed.
I saw the part in question, and Amanda handled it just fine- she is a an adult, no big deal. If you saw it, Bill's reporter was "soo scary" , that the guy she was with stepped aside and let Amanda answer the questions-where is the controversy? Tom813
- Atrios
- Kiko's House
- Suburban Guerilla
- Booman Tribune
- All-Spin Zone
- Philly (Dragonballyee)
- Afro-Netizen
- Rowhouse Logic
- MyDD
- Bad Attitudes
- Billmon
- iFlipFlop
- CorrenteWire
- upyernoz
- Tattered Coat
- Fables of the Reconstruction
- Slacktivist
- Citizen Mom
- The Next Mayor
- Philly Future
- Philadelphia Will Do
- Philebrity
- Young Philly Politics
- Phillyblog
- Welcome to Phillyville
- Phawker
- A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
- Keystone Blog
- Philadelphia - America's Hometown
- BlankBaby
- Above Average Jane
- Phillyist
- Metroblogging Philadelphia
- The Clog
- Josh Marshall
- Daily Kos
- Juan Cole
- Oliver Willis
- Andy Borowitz
- War and Piece
- Wonkette
- BuzzFlash
- Raw Story
- Cursor
- Crooks and Liars
- Swing State Project
- Kevin Drum
- Talk Left
- AmericaBlog
- Hullabaloo
- Mad Kane
- Think Progress
- Jesus' General
- The Carpetbagger Report
- Majikthise
- Echidne of the Snakes
- David Sirota
- Glenn Greenwald
- TBogg
- Fire Dog Lake
- Taylor Marsh
- Matthew Yglesias
- Jon Swift
- Drudge Report
- Beer Leaguer
- The 700 Level
- Dick Polman
- Balls, Sticks and Stuff
- Shallow Center
- Philling Station
- Phillies Nation
- A Citizen's Blog
- The Good Phight
- Romenesko
- Editor and Publisher
- Pressthink
- Buzzmachine
- The Inksniffer
- Media Bloodhound
- Eat the Press
- Mickey Kaus
- Media (Huffington Post)
- Blinq
- The Corner
- Instapundit
- Andrew Sullivan
- Free Republic
- James Taranto
- Blonde Sagacity
- ScrappleFace
- Blogorrhea
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008








