It was strangely flattering that several folks in the weird world of journalism reform were mad that I was away from the computer last week and couldn't rant about the great newspaper kerfluffle in this city, about whether certain kinds of news from the Philadelphia Inquirer gets published first on the World Wide Web or on the bark of dead trees. Wrote media guru Jeff Jarvis: "What a rotten time for Norgman Will Bunch to be on vacation and offline."
Maybe for him; frankly, I was quite happy to be 3,000 miles away from 400 North Broad Street last week. But now, the "Norgman" has returned, and so I guess I'll have to weigh in on this. First of all, David Carr of the New York Times did a good job summarizing the issue this morning:
There is a lesson there for rest of the media, most specifically The Philadelphia Inquirer, where the managing editor, Michael Leary, issued a memo last week suggesting that all of the paper’s good stuff — “signature investigative reporting, enterprise, trend stories, news features and reviews” — would not appear online until they first appear in print.
“For our bloggers, especially, this may require a bit of an adjustment,” Mr. Leary informed the staff. “Some of you like to try out ideas that end up as subjects of stories or columns in print first. If in doubt, consult your editor.”
Even to the eye of this reporter — to use a hack newspaper term — The Inquirer seems to be making a mistake. If the future of our business is online, then why set up a firewall, delaying the best content to protect a legacy product? And more adept reporters are beginning to realize that the Web is not just a way to broadcast news, it is a great way to assemble it as well.
First of all, since there seems to be a lot of confusion around this point, I should remind people that I work for the Daily News and not the Inquirer, and while we may be owned by the same characters, the way that the organization is set up I have as much to do with what happens in their newsroom as with what happens at the Omaha World-Herald. That said, while in one sense I agree wholeheartedly with Jarvis and the harsher critics of the Inquirer, in another unfortunate sense I think the controversy is a tad overblown. Let me explain.
I believe the critics are 100 percent right in the sense that perception is reality, and the retro, 1990s vibe -- and its curmudgeonly undercurrent of hostility toward the Internet -- that Leary's memo set off is exactly the wrong message to be sending from anywhere in the Philadelphia Media Holdings empire. The newsroom needs to project a forward-looking image, and so the widespread perception of the Inquirer as backward-looking is a dangerous thing.
That said, my sense as a regular reader of the Inquirer and Philly.com is that the practical impact of this "new policy" is virtually nil. The sad truth is that there isn't a bold tradition of the Inquirer publishing stories first on the Web that's being eliminated here. If I were Mike Leary, here's what I'd do.
1) Admit that the first memo was a mistake and withdraw it, and thank all the bloggers and other who've commented on it for their positive ideas or suggestions.
2) Convene a newsroom summit on how the Inquirer can better use the Web to systematically enhance and promote stories, not on a false choice of giving them away or not giving them away.
In Carr's NYT article today, the "lesson" that he refers to is how blogging and online video clips of the spectacular Olympics opening ceremony in Beijing didn't undercut NBC's telecast by giving it away for free -- but enhanced it by teasing and exciting people to watch the whole thing in big-screen glory. The same could be true for the Inquirer and the Internet -- selected excepts and blogging or even YouTube style video clips could be used to promote and interest people in what's in tomorrow's print edition, which could then focus on longer-form journalism that works better in hard type.
I understand the passion of Internet enthusiasts who want to kill the newspaper altogether, but many of them are so caught up in their online world that that fail to realize something that seems so illogical to them -- the dead-tree version of the paper continues to bring in A LOT more revenue than the online version, and will continue to do so for the next few years. Thus, a strategy that at least for now continues to think about ways to keep an audience for the print edition but also makes the most of the Internet is one that would actually make sense. It will pay to keep good journalists working while we make this dificult transition. Leary's memo comes off as knee-jerk, but maybe there's still a way to make it a knee jerk in the right direction.
Comment removed.
Politico is the same way. They are supposed to be nearly all online, but they bring in more than half of their revenue from their print addition. (Lobbying firms pay a hefty premium since the print is read by a lot of DC insiders.) The media just hasn't figured out a way to bring in good money on the internet.— bon- ...you nailed it will; use the Internet to lead readers into more in depth coverage in the print edition, and stop treating the two (internet and print) as separate when doling out content.— E Plebnista
- Comment removed.
- Comment removed.
- "managing editor, Michael Leary" - obviously need a NEW managing editor. We want more content online, more real-time news online - so find a way to get advertising to pay for that too. There would be more traffic online if philly.com could design a better home page. More news stories "above the fold" = more new page clicks, how difficult is that to understand? Seriously, hire some news-tech savvy people - and some more interesting editorial persons - because right now it's just same-old stuff over and over again.— pal
- Comment removed.
- The Inquirer still has editors?— hiester
I believe that some papers have decided the opposite--breaking news goes online immediately and appears in papers when the print run happens. For news, this makes more sense to me. I don't count on the two newspapers I read daily to give me the latest, which I now get from either my Internet connection or cable 24-hour news. Newspapers give me depth of coverage and columnists and letters to the editor. That kind of stuff probably ought to appear first in print (for the paper's financial reasons only).
Will Bunch, a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News, blogs about his obsessions, including national and local politics and world affairs, the media, pop music, the Philadelphia Phillies, soccer and other sports, not necessarily in that order.
E-mail Will by clicking here.
PLEASE COMMENT WITH PASSION...
...but not with racial slurs, potentially libelous allegations, obscenities or other juvenile noise. Such comments will, at our discretion, be deleted in their entirety, and repeat offenders will be blocked from commenting. ALSO: Any commenter advocating killing any government official will be immediately banned.
Thanks.
- Atrios
- Kiko's House
- Suburban Guerilla
- Booman Tribune
- All-Spin Zone
- Philly (Dragonballyee)
- Afro-Netizen
- Rowhouse Logic
- MyDD
- Bad Attitudes
- Billmon
- iFlipFlop
- CorrenteWire
- upyernoz
- Tattered Coat
- Fables of the Reconstruction
- Slacktivist
- Citizen Mom
- The Next Mayor
- Philly Future
- Philadelphia Will Do
- Philebrity
- Young Philly Politics
- Phillyblog
- Welcome to Phillyville
- Phawker
- A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
- Keystone Blog
- Philadelphia - America's Hometown
- BlankBaby
- Above Average Jane
- Phillyist
- Metroblogging Philadelphia
- The Clog
- Josh Marshall
- Daily Kos
- Juan Cole
- Oliver Willis
- Andy Borowitz
- War and Piece
- Wonkette
- BuzzFlash
- Raw Story
- Cursor
- Crooks and Liars
- Swing State Project
- Kevin Drum
- Talk Left
- AmericaBlog
- Hullabaloo
- Mad Kane
- Think Progress
- Jesus' General
- The Carpetbagger Report
- Majikthise
- Echidne of the Snakes
- David Sirota
- Glenn Greenwald
- TBogg
- Fire Dog Lake
- Taylor Marsh
- Matthew Yglesias
- Jon Swift
- Drudge Report
- Beer Leaguer
- The 700 Level
- Dick Polman
- Balls, Sticks and Stuff
- Shallow Center
- Philling Station
- Phillies Nation
- A Citizen's Blog
- The Good Phight
- Romenesko
- Editor and Publisher
- Pressthink
- Buzzmachine
- The Inksniffer
- Media Bloodhound
- Eat the Press
- Mickey Kaus
- Media (Huffington Post)
- Blinq
- The Corner
- Instapundit
- Andrew Sullivan
- Free Republic
- James Taranto
- Blonde Sagacity
- ScrappleFace
- Blogorrhea
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- News | Sports | Business | What's Happening | Restaurants & Food | Entertainment | Living | Marketplace | Jobs
