So apparently "opinions" on local news are worse than "sleaze"
News blogs, sports blogs, entertainment blogs, and more from Philly.com, The Philadelphia Inquirer and the Philadelphia Daily News.
So apparently "opinions" on local news are worse than "sleaze"
Sunday nights are my editing shift at the Daily News and one of the rituals is that a reporter watches the 10 o' clock news on Fox-29 -- to make sure we're not totally missing some big local story -- and then the news on other channels at 11. But the reporter who checked in on Fox-29 last night came back with a puzzled look on his face. "It wasn't like regular news -- all they did was talk about the Delaware Senate race for 10 minutes." At midnight, the early edition of today's Inquirer was plopped down on my desk and it turned out that what's been happening on the local Fox affiliate is actually newsworthy, in and of itself.
In a makeover that took shape in late spring, according to head brass, Fox29 has revamped its news approach, with a brighter look, a harder edge (some call it editorializing), ramped-up audience outreach (some call it pandering), and a new stress on commentary and discussion that makes it look somewhat more like 24/7 cable news. But a range of viewers and journalists interviewed for this story say they're uneasy about the degree to which it encourages reporters like Keeley to mix viewpoint with reportage.
Ratings for local news have been slipping everywhere for years. In response, Fox29 - like stations across the country - is changing its approach. The target: viewers abandoning established networks for smaller, edgier cable news channels, shifting allegiance from supposedly centrist, balanced news to opinionation, from the measured voice of Cronkite toward O'Reilly or Olbermann.
Says occasional Fox29 commentator and former Inquirer writer Buzz Bissinger, "They're looking for people with stronger opinions. It signals that they're looking for a harder edge."
The overall tone of the Inquirer story of one of alarm, and I think it would be fair to say that it is also negative. That shouldn't be a shock -- as a newspaper, the Inquirer has worshipped at the altar of the false gods of balance and a contrived interpretation of objectivity even more than most of their counterparts, so it's natural for them to recoil at what's apparently happening here at Fox-29. And I would agree that there are issues. For one thing, more opinion calls out for more transparency, and also it's important for the people over there to understand that good journalism with a point of view still requires you to be a) scrupulously accurate and b) fair, which means still talking with the folks from both, or all, sides of an issue.
That said, I think the story missed the one highly positive development from what I've read now and heard about the experiment: These longer reports, including opinion, seem to be devoting a lot more time to issues that actually matter to people, as opposed to the worthless dreck that has filled up the bulk of local TV news time for the last 30 years -- especially in Philadelphia, where the phrase "if it bleeds, it leads" was literally invented. If they start every newscast talking about a local election or the gross mismanagement at the PHA or DRPA -- all recent topics of reporting and debate on Fox-29 -- that isn't that much, much better than a montage of yellow crime tape that apparently titillates some viewers but informs no one?
While Fox-29 is apparently corrupting viewers with their shocking opinions (is it really going that far out on a limb at this point calling for Carl Greene to take a hike?), there was a revealing story recently on the journalism website Poynter.org about how how bad most local TV news has become in recent years.
The Cincinnati news viewers told us they were growing impatient with journalists who don’t take them seriously. They said they wanted more coverage of serious political issues and they wanted a lot less crime news, unless the crime had real importance to a lot of people.
But their strongest words were focused toward journalists who grandstand and make stories seem bigger than they are. We showed the focus group two stories. One from Detroit, where a reporter confronts the wife of a city councilman who is accused of drunk driving. The focus group said by the end of the story, they felt sorry for the wife and turned their anger toward the reporter. After all, the group said, the wife did nothing wrong, it was her husband who was accused of wrongdoing.
I showed the group a story from Fox 40 TV in Sacramento, California. In the piece, Reporter Rick Boone is covering the story of what he called a “major bust,” at a motel that the station called “a house of sex.” Police arrested three women and one motel manager.
In the story, Boone stuck a microphone in the face of one of the handcuffed women and asked, “what were you doing in there, what were you doing in there, what were you doing in there?”
It's funny -- I know that because of my liberal leanings I'm supposed to recoil at the idea that anything with the word "Fox" in the title is becoming more opinionated, and indeed the Inquirer story discussed whether the new opinion-giving Fox-29 has a conservative slant. Honestly, I would be OK with that, as long as they were fair and accurate and reached out to the other side on issues. (Besides, if the format succeeded in a conservative form it would probably eventually give rise to a local liberal alternative, as has happened nationally with Fox News and now at least a few hours of prime time MSNBC). It would be a treat, however, to see more local stations talk -- and yes, argue and give their opinions -- about the things that really matter to people rather than a bloody string of car crashes interspersed with nice-weather features, night after night after night.
Cue right wing nut jobs to find something to criticize 5...4...3...2...1...
Comment removed.
Wow, Will. We actually agree for once.— Philalawyer- concur.— phillygreen
Not bad Will. It would be nice, however, if real repoting was done in print. If PNI would just admit their slant and get the slant and opinion out of what it prints it may survive. The obvious bias is part of the decline of readership.— georgel- I like it as long as they state they're editorializing a bit. I even like that it's conservative, because the main reason the conservatives ever win a public opinion battle is ignorance of the facts by the voting public. The more that the GOP puts out statements, such as they don't support tax cuts for the middle class, the more people will realize that they aren't helping the country. The issue is that all of the conservative thinking is done on Fox News and the vast majority of true independents or undecideds don't watch that. Also, too many people think nothing is going on because of the lack of real stories on the local news. Sadly, people believe TV more than print these days thanks to the proliferation of falsehoods on the internet.— HandNik
Local news is usually more incomepetent than anything else. An example? REAL local news may involve important things like bond and zoning issues but the local newscasters will ignore these important, but BORING issues like the plague and look for "juicy issues" like sex scandals because that's what gets ratings.— wylies99- Local news stations...that includes 6-10-3...put their "cutie pie" air heads...except for Monica Malpass who is trying to look younger than she is with the plastic surgery and that weird hair do...channel ten has the blonde nitwits..three has the aging Pat Chirocci who gets on my last nerve but not as much as channel six who has that gravely voiced blonde bimbo doing sports. Local news is only worth watching to get the exact weather from Hurricane Schwartz...Melissa McGee likes to use big words when she says "liquid precipitation"...duh...it's rain! So I am saying that local news stinks.— nuffera
- Hello Will Bunch, From 1969 to 1973 I was in the military and in 1969 and 1970 I spent time in San Antonio, Texas. One local TV station (channel 8 or 6 I came from NYC in which the channel were 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13 vhf stations)stood out as leading almost every news broadcast with some bloody murder, car crash or other horror. This is the first time I heard the phrase "If it bleeds, it leads". The station's unofficial name was bloody (channel number X). Ah memories.— caseyf5
- Local news in Philadelphia is a joke. I heard somewhere that they target their newscasts to a hypothetical audiance with an assumed education level of a 13 year old. I am watching channel 3 as I write this and that idiot has reported on traffic 3 times in the last 10 minutes! I am sick of "human interest" stories. They do not report on anything important until after the newspapers cover it. I buy and read a hard copy of the Inky and Daily News everyday. At least the papers don't giggle and smile while I get my news.— samsjr
"Honestly, I would be OK with that, as long as they were fair and accurate and reached out to the other side on issues. (Besides, if the format succeeded in a conservative form it would probably eventually give rise to a local liberal alternative, as has happened nationally with Fox News and now at least a few hours of prime time MSNBC)" Yeah, MSNBC sure has "balance." Uh, Will, prime time on Fox and MSNBC are given over to opinion shows - not news. During News segments, Fox actually lays out both sides of the argument.- theodotius - have you ever turned MSNBC on between 6&9am? Except for the run-on rants of Scarborough, it's as fair & balanced as it gets on TV these days. And, you're dreaming about Fox laying out both sides of the argument. The "lay out" is about 80/20 not 50/50!— philasportsfan
- Comment removed.
- Comment removed.
- Yeah the inky will be shut down soon and all its left lenaing liberal employees can take Obama up on those unemployment extensions.— B-Rooster
- philasportsfan, I was talking about prime time (as was Will.) Also, just presenting a conservative viewpoint in context does not make it 80/20. The misrepresentation of conservative views by MSNBC, et al. is nothing new.
samsjr - the papers may not giggle at you but they are laughing at you for buying them. They are chanting one word: "Sucker!" But no giggles...- So this has been going on for five months & you're just catching on ? I'm sure you would've been aware of this if not for your fascination with Glenn Beck.Way too distracting.— (reeducated)Yankee Air Pirate
- See what happens when you stay away from Beck, Palin, etc? A well written and thought out post appears.— RG
- you didyour best to actually stay as close to the middle as possible for that story Bunch.......'give rise to a liberal outlet like msnbc'?? give rise? lol!— keapitreal
- "If they start every newscast talking about a local election or the gross mismanagement at the PHA or DRPA" -- hear, hear, Will... Since FOX29 has an hour long show at 10pm, which none of the other channels do, they should be able to delve more deeply into issues of local importance. Right now I'd love to see an investigative piece on whether we have a gas pipe risk like what happened in California. Also HONEST coverage of local elections, so we can understand our choices better. A great for instance IS in Delaware -- what has Mike Castle done, what does he stand for vs. his Tea Party opponent. If you were a conservative voter, wouldn't you like to see Mike Castle's voting record over the years, instead of having to rely on campaign ads? The news these days, local and national, has utterly failed in anything resembling journalistic integrity (and yes, that INCLUDES Fox news). It is a pure ratings push for ALL news organizations which goes right to, "if it bleeds, it leads". Can you believe that we do not have daily or monthly updates on progress of rebuilding New Orleans, what has happened after the Tsunami, what's really going on at Ground Zero (not the mosque, what are they doing to rebuild the towers!!!), in depth analysis of the economy from Reagan on... Aren't these important topics?— IggleFan68
- Comment removed.
More alleged "journalists" telling you what your opinion should be. Pathetic. News is supposed to be dispassionate and allow the viewer/reader to make up his or her own mind. Surrendering your judgment for theirs just makes you another lemming running off the cliff.- I used to watch the local news until everything became "exclusive" and "only on nbc10"...— palmyra21
In the abstract, "balance" is itself a bias, inasmuch as it depends on where the editor sees the middle ground or axis. Its obsession with appeasing both ends of a supposed political spectrum means original viewpoints will be tend to be overlooked or ignored. In practice, we find that "balance" is either a cop-out or a guise. In this era of truly diverse and democratic media, it's also pointless. Let FoxNews be what it is, without the charade, eh? More folks would respect it, and might even watch it. Same goes for MSNBC.
This is even spilling over to 3,6,&10. I have seen two softball interviews on 3 with Jon Runyan. The first, everyone was falling over themselves to stroke him. Then an interview with John Adler by Pat Ciarocchi actually made my eyes bleed when she questioned him for about 5 minutes with all of the wingnut talking points about President Obama. Not a word on his record (by the way, it really sucks and I wont vote for him if I lived in his district) or his plans for the next Congress— Les Ismore- Les -- Jon Runyan's record as an offensive lineman is pretty good!— IggleFan68
IggleFan - Runyan is just happy he isn't facing Stahan.— bird11- Comment removed.
- MSL - how about we stop trying for "balance" on focus on reporting facts? For example, "The Obama Healthcare plan will cost the following US taxpayers the following amounts over the next 20 years (chart follows) -- source of information provided". When opinion is provided, make it clear that it's OPINION: "Based on these facts, I draw the following conclusions about the situation in Iraq/Afghanistan: a, b,c,..." Note: facts are NOT necessarily statistics. I can come up with statistics that would make you think that the Iggles won Sunday's game.— IggleFan68
- They (you) all have an agenda.....jsut like you do Will....there is NO "jsut reporting the news" as you and all your media cohorts are so impressed with yourselves that you feel the need to foist you personal feeling on us.....the good news is we don't have to look at you print media types.....on the other hand....any bimbo or studly guy of all races who fits the youthfull imagine a network wants to portray who can also read copy or a teleprompter gets the job.......(think of your anchors anywhere....philly, denver, atlanta, dc, pittsburgh and deny that ) all that said, we then go to the editorial boards and the owners of the stations and see where they spend thier money (as in political donations) and you will see the slant they will have their people put on stories.....sleeze is a nice way of saying they are all ho's to ratings and their own agenda's.....and them proof of all this is whether this note will be screened out or shown...— nuggett
- The problem with attempting to be factual is that 1) often the media can't get to the people with the real facts (or they are too boring especially for TV) and 2) the people the media can access is in constant spin mode. I have been personally involved in about a dozen events in my life of which I had intimate knowledge that were reported in the media. I can say that the media was a big fat 0 for 12 in getting those stories correct. And it really isn't their fault because even if they had ask me I couldn't/wouldn't talk to them.— bird11
- GOP Chair apologizes to President Obama for GOP Racism... Wow! http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/09/cashed-out_big_time.php#more?ref=fpblg— Les Ismore
- Because Bunch is constitutionally incapable of being balanced and and objective, he calls those who strive to be worshippers of "false gods." That takes care of it, I guess. Like a kleptomaniac calling the Commandmant forbidding theft a rule handed down by a false god.— pj katauskas
Oh well, I was wondering how long it would take for the long arm of Murdoch to reach his local stations. Hey, you might be right, Will, maybe it will prime the pump for more discussion from all sides (thant's right Virginia, there are more than one side to most political stories), but I doubt it.— Hamlet- "MSL - how about we stop trying for "balance" on focus on reporting facts?" . . . . . Sure, but someone still has to decide for you what facts are worth finding, reporting, and worth ignoring. That's not a technical exercise, it's an art. And, it's becoming as obsolete in this information age as the Town Crier of yore when the printing press was invented.
- Good point, MSL. And the need for immediate information - or the supposed need - leads too often to unanalyzed and unverified "facts" being reported.— pj katauskas
- {{{The French senate approved Tuesday a law banning any veils that cover the face -- including the burqa, the full-body covering worn by some Muslim women -- making France the first European country to nationally impose such a measure. The law passed by a vote of 246 to 1, with about 100 abstentions coming essentially from left-leaning politicians. The legislation was overwhelmingly approved by the lower house of parliament in July and will go into effect next spring. French people back the ban by a margin of more than four to one, the Pew Global Attitudes Project found in a survey earlier this year. Some 82 percent of people polled approved of a ban, while 17 percent disapproved. That was the widest support the Washington-based think tank found in any of the five countries it surveyed. Clear majorities also backed burqa bans in Germany, Britain and Spain, while two out of three Americans opposed it, the survey found.}}} Once again proof of which country is actually the most tolerant in the world.— bird11
- "Once again proof of which country is actually the most tolerant in the world." . . . . . And why we must keep it that way.
- "And why we must keep it that way." By protecting speech we don't agree with.— RG
- "And why we must keep it that way." MSL this is a excellent article that RG posted this weekend on how we keep it that way - free speech. http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/09/10/balkin.first.amendment/index.html?hpt=T2— bird11
This is perfectly acceptable in Associated Press articles, though.
I actually noticed this and was surprised. At the same time, I notice bitter partisan views on the Today Show every day when my wife has it on while I'm getting ready for work.
- Andrew Sullivan
- Blinq
- Blogorrhea
- Blonde Sagacity
- Free Republic
- Instapundit
- James Taranto
- ScrappleFace
- The Corner
- Buzzmachine
- Eat the Press
- Editor and Publisher
- Media (Huffington Post)
- Media Bloodhound
- Mickey Kaus
- Pressthink
- Romenesko
- The Inksniffer
- A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
- Above Average Jane
- BlankBaby
- Citizen Mom
- Keystone Blog
- Metroblogging Philadelphia
- Phawker
- Philadelphia - America's Hometown
- Philadelphia Will Do
- Philebrity
- Philly Future
- Phillyblog
- Phillyist
- The Clog
- The Next Mayor
- Welcome to Phillyville
- Young Philly Politics
- Afro-Netizen
- All-Spin Zone
- Atrios
- Bad Attitudes
- Billmon
- Booman Tribune
- CorrenteWire
- Fables of the Reconstruction
- iFlipFlop
- Kiko's House
- MyDD
- Philly (Dragonballyee)
- Rowhouse Logic
- Slacktivist
- Suburban Guerilla
- Tattered Coat
- upyernoz
- AmericaBlog
- Andy Borowitz
- BuzzFlash
- Crooks and Liars
- Cursor
- Daily Kos
- David Sirota
- Drudge Report
- Echidne of the Snakes
- Fire Dog Lake
- Glenn Greenwald
- Hullabaloo
- Jesus' General
- Jon Swift
- Josh Marshall
- Juan Cole
- Kevin Drum
- Mad Kane
- Majikthise
- Matthew Yglesias
- Oliver Willis
- Raw Story
- Swing State Project
- Talk Left
- Taylor Marsh
- TBogg
- The Carpetbagger Report
- Think Progress
- War and Piece
- Wonkette
- A Citizen's Blog
- Balls, Sticks and Stuff
- Beer Leaguer
- Dick Polman
- Phillies Nation
- Philling Station
- Shallow Center
- The 700 Level
- The Good Phight
