Report: Corbett clamps down on natural-gas regulators
News blogs, sports blogs, entertainment blogs, and more from Philly.com, The Philadelphia Inquirer and the Philadelphia Daily News.
Report: Corbett clamps down on natural-gas regulators
In case you needed any more proof that Gov. Tom Corbett came to Harrisburg with a mission -- to do anything and everything to help his billionaire friends in the natural gas biz -- and that all that other running-the-state stuff comes second, check out this stunning report tonight from the Pulitizer Prize-winning investigative squad at ProPublica:
Oil and gas inspectors policing Marcellus Shale development in Pennsylvania will no longer be able to issue violations to the drilling companies they regulate without first getting the approval of top officials.
That’s according to a directive laid out in a series of emails received by the Department of Environmental Protection staff last week and leaked to ProPublica. The emails say the new edict applies only to enforcement actions related to Marcellus Shale drilling and that failure to seek prior approval “will not be acceptable.”
Ha. Real shock. That gas pipe up Corbett's ess is just getting bigger and longer. CiceroSpuriousDeodatus
Rain Man was less socially awkward. And didn't have any white guilt. RG
2- Absurd words....Logical Liberal.......
TPS_ my former screen name was "Idiot Liberal"- I know it's diffficult for you to grasp- but it was a dig at Idiotic Liberals like yourself. Please TPS- this OCD you have is annoying- typing the same words over and over again on every post? "Oh my sides" "Hilarious"- get on PAXIL ASAP. You obviously are unable to come up with other words- sayings. Not being cruel- but are you like Rain Man? Keep The Change- "Next, we are going to have liberals start ranting about how you don't govern based on poll numbers, completing their hypocrisy." . . . . . . Well, when you consider the Tea Party now has only a 32% approval rating (CNN/ORC), you'd expect such hypocrisy from the right as well. It's obvious that most Americans expect compromise from both sides to reach a governing consensus.
- Conservatives have consistently said, "you don't govern according to poll numbers"... Hypocrisy for conservatives would be for us to now assail Obama and say that he needs to start doing things different BASED on the poll numbers. I just like to make fun of him for it.
IggleFan68 - Good point, Iggy. We never heard "conservatives" whine about healthcare reform because of poll numbers.
Nope. Never. Didn't happen. Never saw it. Nada. Nyet. Niente. Nein.
And, of course, Republicans never look to the polls when they stake out their positions.
Nope. Never. Didn't happen. Never saw it. Nada. Nyet. Niente. Nein. Talking point sleuth - What you consistently saw during the Bush years is loons complaining that Bush was governing against the will of the people, as demonstrated by poll #'s. I have consistently maintained that governing via polls is a huge mistake, because the public's opinion can change drastically based on what information is available to them and how it is portrayed. A President should be doing what HE (or she) thinks is right. President Bush took consistent stands on things that were unpopular -- for example stem cell research. Despite being the first President to approve funds to the research, he was wildly castigated by the "scientific community" - read media liberals, for not throwing more money at in, and not allowing the harvesting of aborted babies for more stem cells (a gruesome thought). And he was proven right when they discovered that they didn't need dead babies to get stem cells...
IggleFan68
4 absurd words.....Climate Change- Hope and Change Keep The Change- Can't you count? one_eyed_jack
- Aaahahahaaha!!! One_eyed_jack: 1 Keep The Change: 0
IggleFan68 - Clearly the four words are "Climate" "Change" "Hope" & "and". What's the problem?
legatus - [[[=== Clearly the four words are "Climate" "Change" "Hope" & "and". What's the problem? ===]]]
And once again, leggy jumps through hoops to defend a "conservative." Talking point sleuth - WOW! You can view my comment as a defense of a conservative if you like...whatever floats your boat, man. I'll continue to view it as it was intended, a light-hearted response to two inane comments....the original and the response by jack. In much the same way, you can view this as a slightly less than light-hearted response to your inane comment.
Absolutely freakin' hilarious. legatus - [[[=== Can't you count? ===]]]
One-eyed,
Meet the poster whose screename used to be "Idiot" untile it was pointed out to him that it wasn't very flattering.
Absolutely freakin' hilarious. Talking point sleuth
TPS- please let everyone know what it was like to grow up a poor black child? Keep The Change
Another climate change denier myth debunked. What's interesting is that just a short time ago, "skeptics" were all atwitter about a new initiative by a research team affiliated with Berkley and their project to reevaluate temperature datasets considering the "urban heat island" effect. Now, after preliminary results show no UHI effect on temperature trends, "skeptics" are crying about a "whitewash." Kind of like blaming facts they don't like on the politics of the source, eh?
--snip--
Let me now address the problem of Poor Temperature Station Quality
Many temperature stations in the U.S. are located near buildings ... Anthony Watts and his team has shown that most of the current stations in the US Historical Climatology Network would be ranked “poor” by NOAA’s own standards...
Did such poor station quality exaggerate the estimates of global warming? We’ve studied this issue, and our preliminary answer is no.
The Berkeley Earth analysis shows that over the past 50 years the poor stations in the U.S. network do not show greater warming than do the good stations...
NOAA has already published a similar conclusion – that station quality bias did not affect estimates of global warming – — based on a smaller set of stations, ... We have looked only at average temperature changes, and additional data needs to be studied, to look at (forexample) changes in maximum and minimum temperatures.
In fact, in our preliminary analysis the good stations report more warming in the U.S. than the poor stations by 0.009 ± 0.009 degrees per decade, opposite to what might be expected, but also consistent with zero.... we are consistently finding that there is no enhancement of global warming trends due to the inclusion of the poorly ranked US stations.
--snip--
http://berkeleyearth.org/Resources/Muller_Testimony_31_March_2011
Talking point sleuth- Wow. I guess we're just posting random stuff now. In that vein, President Obama's approval ratings have hit a new low -- 42% (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/50038.html). Next, we are going to have liberals start ranting about how you don't govern based on poll numbers, completing their hypocrisy.
IggleFan68 - [[[=== Wow. I guess we're just posting random stuff now ===]]]
Good point, Iggy. Because "Idiot" posting about my "white guilt" was on point. As while bile.atkins' posting about Will's affiliarion with Media Matters, as was RG's post about Libya, as was RG's post about Cuomo, as was YOUR post about Congressional voting and war, etc.
No selective reasoning there, Iggy. Just straight up logical analysis in your estimation.
Say, Iggy, you wouldn't happen to vote Republican, would you? Talking point sleuth - Aaahahahhaahhaha I get to post TPS's favorite comment: WAHHHHHHH!!! Mommy, they did it first!!!!
IggleFan68 - Why is it that "conservatives" have such a hard time with so simple a concept as what constitutes a "Mommy, mommy" post.
Iggy - I wasn't justifying bad behavior by whining that "mommy, mommy, they did it first/too." I see nothing wrong with my OT post, and see no reason to justify it.
My point was to show how stunningly selective your "outrage" about OT posts was. Numerous OT posts from our much beloved Attytood "conservative," and not a peep from you. An OT post from me and you whine like a stuck pig.
There - got it now? Talking point sleuth
TPS- the World's Greatest Guilty White Liberal.
Tell us all how you have a "Black friend" please?
Tell us all how minorities think please? Who better than a White Liberal to inform us? Keep The Change
Here's the problem with using such obviously tilted (and tainted) sources -- you start to equate them with the National Enquirer. Now, occasionally, the National Enquirer actually breaks real news. But since 99.99% of it is such wild bullcr*p, it's automatically dismissed. That's how conservatives feel about the LA Times, NY Times, Time Magazine, MSNBC, and anything George Soros related. Oh, almost forgot 60 minutes and Dan Rather. You see, these folks have done so much over the years to slant their reporting, now it is all considered slanted reporting. IggleFan68
Comment removed.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/03/29/fox-news-executive-admits-his-attempt-to-link-obama-to-socialism-was-a-lie/
See, left-leaning organizations do use actual facts because liberals operate under the mistaken impression that conservatives are merely misinformed. Clearly, it's that right-wingers simply refuse to acknowledge anything that contradicts their emotionally-authoritarian view of the universe. Much simpler than actually weighing the evidence! Susie from Philly- Aahhahaah on that story there is a big ad that says "Tell Harrisburg NO NEW TAXES"..... See my point on the National Enquirer Susie -- Loonie Liberals reporting "facts" are like a broken clock -- it's right twice a day...
IggleFan68
Good take on the unintended consequences of the Libya bombing. "In all the discussion about the current U.S. bombing of Libya, something important has gone almost unnoticed—the lesson the United States is teaching the government of every country on earth. That lesson is: no matter what, no matter the inducements or pressure, never ever give up chemical weapons or a nuclear weapons program. Doing so will not ensure that the U.S. does not attack you—on the contrary, it will make it much more likely." http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/003470.html RG
Shame on our Governor, Bought and sold people screwed again moneywort
Obama lied, people died. PresidentSpock
With all that is going on in Obama's world today- Bunch continues to write about a republican govenor?
Libya- $4.00 Gasoline- Transparency- Trillions in debt- no jobs- housing crisis-.......Bunch- please post your 503,493,930 George Bush blog posts from the past? Keep The Change
[[[=== Yes, don't debate the facts, just attack the messenger ===]]]
Interesting that, isn't it? So how, exactly, does this work? Since the source quotes people from both sides of the issue, should we then discount the "libz" and believe the quotes from Corbett's officials (since ProPublica is part of the vast left-wing media conspiracy)?
But wait. None of what ProPublic writes can be trusted. So then, obviously, Corbett's officials are lying because they were quoted by ProPublica.
Man, it gets really confusing when you can't actually dispute the facts and only dismiss facts because of the source that provides them.
Or, you could simply discount only those facts that you don't like because of the source, and as a consequence, vote Republican. Talking point sleuth
Inquiring minds want to know. Has Will left Soros and Media Matters? No mention of it in his bio. tr88
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
And why the horse is still on the ground, why don't we hear the left's squealing about Andrew Cuomo? The NY budget just got cut with no tax increases, just like in NJ. Could it be that pesky D after his name?http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42353139/ns/business/ RG
"Dubya had Congress vote after manipulating and lying about the evidence" Umm, not really. Most in Congress didn't even bother to read the NIE before casting their vote. Hillary delegated it to a staffer. RG- ///I'm guessing you also have concerns about the Communist flouridation of our water.///
Now, this is an area where I have some expertise.
You tell 'em, buttermilk! Falls Ed
BillHicks, thanks for pointing out an omission. I should have said "only" using facts that support their position. Will, I cannot even come up with a comment on that one. Everything I posted can easily be found on the internet. That phenomenon is known as using sources that don't necessarily lean left. Many people can do that. buttermilk67
Will, only you can break this partisan gridlock and vitriol. There's only one subject that can do that. RG- go Phillies one_eyed_jack
"Under Dubya the Republican Party lied us into war, so you have no leg to stand on." Nice one, Billy. He at least had Congress vote on it. IIRC, alot of Dems supported force. Obama skipped that whole step. I'd cll that circumventing democracy, wouldn't you? RG- P.S. I am not a supporter of the Libyan intervention. Unlike your hero Rand Paul, who earlier this month supported intervention but now that Obama has gone and done it is now against it.
- I agree that is circumventing democracy. But coming from the right wing (with a few notable exceptions, such as Ron Paul) such charges are absolutely laughable and hypocritical. Dubya had Congress vote after manipulating and lying about the evidence. So the fact that he "had Congress vote on it" is splitting hairs. And at least Obama didn't manufacture evidence and lie to the American people and to Congress to get us into war, which I'd argue is a far worse crime, no?
- According to TPS, relating previous bad acts with current bad act is, "Mommy Mommy, they did it first!"... How is having Congress vote on it "splitting hairs"??? And tell me, how did W possibly manipulate every member of Congress?? They had the same access to the same information that he did. And please, when you say "W lied", include all the others that must have lied as well. Including President Clinton, Hilary Clinton, Colin Powell, John Kerry, and just about every single Congressman. One thing you liberals can't seem to get over -- Bush didn't lie -- he genuinely believed that there were WMD in mass quantities in Iraq (as Saddam himself proclaimed). The only fact there is that it was never found in mass quantities. Beyond that, the US had EVERY RIGHT to RESUME THE 1991 war on Iraq due to it's NUMEROUS/COUNTLESS violations of the cease-fire agreement. Bush didn't HAVE to go to Congress to get approval -- Iraq was under a CEASE-FIRE.
IggleFan68
jeez bunch does corbett make your %$#@ hard. holy cow every other day you are after the guy lol rysagr
"Only right wingers could support circumventing democracy" Only left wingers could support circumventing democracy to attack another country. RG- Nice change of subject. I could see why you would want to. And funny how the right wing all was pushing Obama to do something in Libya and now that he has they are opposing him. Meanwhile there is a sharp divide among the left over his actions there, with a large number opposed to his actions there. Besides, don't even go there. Under Dubya the Republican Party lied us into war, so you have no leg to stand on.
- Only right wingers could support circumventing democracy in order to make our air and drinking water more polluted. Anything for a buck, the Republican motto.
- Welcome back, Bill. I thought you had passed away or something. Mr. Smith
- Dave Kopel, a policy analyst for the Libertarian-oriented and corporate funded Cato Institute and a former columnist for the now-defunct Rocky Mountain News, criticized a ProPublica report on hydraulic fracturing as a "one-sided series of facts arrayed to support a point of view". He argued that a common theme in ProPublica's work is that "the government is not doing a good enough job in controlling things, particularly things involving big business".
"...the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). CFR is well known for advocating a single world government." I'm guessing you also have concerns about the Communist flouridation of our water. Let me know if your research uncovers whether ProPublica also owns a fleet of black helicopters. will- Will, your post is silly. ProPublica is left leaning. Of course those are the only sources you use. We understand.
- Yes, don't debate the facts, just attack the messenger. Very right wing. If it doesn't come from FOX "news" or right wing radio, it can be ignored.
The Pulitzer prize doesn't say much about integrity. Will Bunch has one somehow. Mr. Smith
Since I've never heard of ProPublica, I decided to look up some info on them. It was founded by Herbert and Marion Sandler. They were the co-CEOs of the Golden West Financial Corp, which was eventually bought out by Wachovia. While running Golden West, Herbert Sandler did a large amount of business with George Soros. Also on the board of ProPublica are Henry Louis Gates and Alberto Ibargüen. Gates is probably most famous for being arrested in Cambridge when his door jammed, leading Obama to say police "acted stupidly" in this. This is the famous Beer Summit. Ibargüen is also on the boards of Pepsi and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). CFR is well known for advocating a single world government. After learning all this in less than a half hour, I'm not surprised Will used this source. It is another leftist "news" organization. In looking at a listing of their partners, every major leftist news organization appears. This same report Will is citing is being blasted as being extremely one-sided and using facts to prove their position. Then again, why am I surprised? buttermilk67- "using facts to prove their position" And Lord knows, Republicans can't have THAT.
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
Comment removed.- Got watch out for this one beetle -- if you posted an article, now you are a blogger and can be taxed.
IggleFan68
Big Daddy, what does your comment have to do with the article, other than questioning what my article has to do with this article?
beetle
You wrote an article in answer to Will's? BigDaddy3150
Comment removed.- Wahhhhhh!! Our liberal weenie lost the election... Wahhhhhhh!!!
IggleFan68 - Why do Attytood's "conservatives" have such trouble with such a simple concept as what constitutes a "Mommy, mommy" post?
I wasn't pointing out that they did it first, or that they did it too, but that your "outrage" about off-topic posts was stunningly selective. Talking point sleuth - Or perhaps there are some overzealous lefties who don't know what they are inspecting. Kinda like a parent checking out the childrens homework.
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
Would a representative of the coal industry promote a favorable regulatory environment for their bitter rivals in the natural gas industry, as you suggest? Mr. Smith
Comment removed.
beetle
What does any of that have to do with the article? BigDaddy3150
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
- Andrew Sullivan
- Blinq
- Blogorrhea
- Blonde Sagacity
- Free Republic
- Instapundit
- James Taranto
- ScrappleFace
- The Corner
- Buzzmachine
- Eat the Press
- Editor and Publisher
- Media (Huffington Post)
- Media Bloodhound
- Mickey Kaus
- Pressthink
- Romenesko
- The Inksniffer
- A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
- Above Average Jane
- BlankBaby
- Citizen Mom
- Keystone Blog
- Metroblogging Philadelphia
- Phawker
- Philadelphia - America's Hometown
- Philadelphia Will Do
- Philebrity
- Philly Future
- Phillyblog
- Phillyist
- The Clog
- The Next Mayor
- Welcome to Phillyville
- Young Philly Politics
- Afro-Netizen
- All-Spin Zone
- Atrios
- Bad Attitudes
- Billmon
- Booman Tribune
- CorrenteWire
- Fables of the Reconstruction
- iFlipFlop
- Kiko's House
- MyDD
- Philly (Dragonballyee)
- Rowhouse Logic
- Slacktivist
- Suburban Guerilla
- Tattered Coat
- upyernoz
- AmericaBlog
- Andy Borowitz
- BuzzFlash
- Crooks and Liars
- Cursor
- Daily Kos
- David Sirota
- Drudge Report
- Echidne of the Snakes
- Fire Dog Lake
- Glenn Greenwald
- Hullabaloo
- Jesus' General
- Jon Swift
- Josh Marshall
- Juan Cole
- Kevin Drum
- Mad Kane
- Majikthise
- Matthew Yglesias
- Oliver Willis
- Raw Story
- Swing State Project
- Talk Left
- Taylor Marsh
- TBogg
- The Carpetbagger Report
- Think Progress
- War and Piece
- Wonkette
- A Citizen's Blog
- Balls, Sticks and Stuff
- Beer Leaguer
- Dick Polman
- Phillies Nation
- Philling Station
- Shallow Center
- The 700 Level
- The Good Phight


