I don’t oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war.
-- then-Illinois state senator Barack Obama, Oct. 2, 2002, in a speech on the possibility of war with Iraq.
It's not always true in life that we get a chance to put our money where our proverbial mouth is. But seven years after that speech, now-President Obama has the decision of a lifetime. He inherited the war in Afghanistan, but will he finish it smartly, or dumbly? If he wants to do it smartly, he was absolutely right to do what he reportedly has done, which is to wipe the proposed options -- most of which are geared toward a military buildup of dubious value -- off the slate, and go back to the drawing board.
The decision on Afghanistan doesn't need to be the quickest possible, but the best possible -- in a situation that is tied closely to a just-concluded election debacle. Obama now needs to absorb the words of the U.S. ambassador, an ex-general who now thinks more troops is a bad idea.
Obama needs to listen to a presidential adviser -- but he needs to listen to one of John F. Kennedy's advisers, Theodore Sorensen, who wrote recently:
In addition to being repeatedly urged to bomb the trails into South Vietnam from the North (which he never did), Kennedy was repeatedly urged to send combat troop divisions (not merely instructors and advisers as Eisenhower had done before him) to supplement South Vietnam’s own troops. (But he never did.) As I advised him: “If ever there was a country that needed to save itself, that country is Vietnam.” Today that country is Afghanistan. But too many of Obama’s advisers, ignoring Kennedy’s lesson, apparently think the answer in Afghanistan is sending more U.S. combat troops. The real question is not the number of American troops in Afghanistan but their mission—to win more deadly battles with the Afghan people, or to win their goodwill?
Yes -- along with the question of whether this is going to be a smart war, or a dumb one.
Since Obama took office, everything's been now now now. Stimulus? Now! Health insurance? We can't wait! Cap and Tax? The earth will blow up if we don't get this yesterday! All of a sudden, in a war Obama and the Dems deem as a necessity, a real crisis, we need to slow it down. What you have here is a President who can't make the tough decision. He used Afghanistan to win the election and now wants out because it doen't help him anymore. That's the only reason for this delay. He'll dilly-dally until the situation is so bad the only choice is to leave, which is Obama's first choice.— jmc
Why is Obama taunting that poor defenseless animal?? Someone please call PETA, ASAP.— bird11
I disagree jmc. I think he has made the tough choice...he has made the choice to delay announcing his intentions to give McChyrstal the additional troops that he said are required in order to complete the mission given to him by the Pres...regardless of the immediate consequences on the ground in Afghanistan. In this way he'll avoid p-ssing off his far left base at a time that he needs them to pass his signature legislation (health care). Now, I don't think that he realized that this legislation would still be pending at this point in time...he thought that HIS congress would've passed the health care bill by now. He is now beginning to realize that this bill's passage will be more protracted than anticipated, and that he is being forced to make a decision on the general's request....3 months later. This is why there have been recent rumors coming out of DC that he is going to give the general the 40,000 troops. It is also why the far left blogoshpere, as exemplified by Will, is trying to put on pressure about this being a "dumb war"...they too realize the handwriting that is on the wall.— legatus
Comment removed.- BHO should consult with Gen'l Jack Ripper as well.— A Friend
- legatus: I assume the generals have presented Obama with their best plans for Afghanistan, and he didn't accept those. The general's goal now is not to make things better in Afghanistan, but to please Obama. If the generals are presenting their best strategies Obama must choose from those, or choose withdrawl. Anything else presented to Obama in the future will will be watered down.— jmc
I suppose Obama could wait years until somebody in Congress realizes that Americans are fed up and finally proposes an Afghanistan Study Group, to give the party some political cover for the mid-terms. Then Obama could wait 9 more months for that group's recommendations and wait several more months for other reports from the Pentagon, then decide. Surge! Yep, Obama could just be a "decider". Would that please Cheney, ya think?- I guess one man's "going back to the drawing board" is another man's "dithering".— bird11
- It really is astounding that there are people advocating, after our previous president launched a ware on rationale that was proven completely faulty, and even more to the point, launched a war on a plan that was unquestioningly inadequately thought out, that Obama should rush to support a war effort for which there is very legitimate debate from multiple perspectives. I support a more aggressive military involvement in Afghanistan, but also recognize many entirely legitimate questions about the potential unintended consequences and other reasons to weigh any decisions very carefully. This is an incredibly complex issue. Wow! The Attytood Republican toadies have gone over the top on this one - no sacrifice is too small, not even the perpetuation of an unwinnable war at a huge expense of human and financial resources, if in the end you can attack Obama for partisan benefit.— Talking point sleuth
- Watch the movie "Osama," TPS, about how women are treated by the Taliban. Once you do, you will agree that we need to commit troops and money to Afghanistan for as long as it takes to get rid of the Taliban.— bird11
- TPS, If we leave Afghanistan, the Taliban will move in to the other Stans as well. It isn't so much an issue of the direct threat they present to us - which I think is minimal - but for the oppression that the Taliban represents for millions of people. I think we have an obligation to lead NATO countries in fighting against that repression. But it takes a commitment to nation building as well - and will be drain of human and financial resources, for which Americans will have to sacrifice. To me, it is a worthwhile effort.— bird11
- Comment removed.
- What's your point, birdie? I have my opinion. But I think that it is unbelievably asinine to suggest that the president shouldn't weigh this decision carefully, and listen and involve those who know far more about the situation than you or I, who feel that increasing our military involvement is the wrong choice. Seriously, read Mathew Hoh's resignation letter and get back to me. The idea that the president should move precipitously only exposes your lack of knowledge about the situation, and your devotion to partisan attacks on Obama above all else.— Talking point sleuth
- Right, jwad, because situation in Afghanistan is a static one. What has happened since Obama took office, after the stepping up of military involvement in the conflict, is completely irrelevant to any decisions going forward. That anyone would suggest such a conceptual foundation for developing an Afghanistan policy is astounding.— Talking point sleuth
- Comment removed.
Will Bunch, a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News, blogs about his obsessions, including national and local politics and world affairs, the media, pop music, the Philadelphia Phillies, soccer and other sports, not necessarily in that order.
E-mail Will by clicking here.
PLEASE COMMENT WITH PASSION...
...but not with racial slurs, potentially libelous allegations, obscenities or other juvenile noise. Such comments will, at our discretion, be deleted in their entirety, and repeat offenders will be blocked from commenting. ALSO: Any commenter advocating killing any government official will be immediately banned.
Thanks.
- Atrios
- Kiko's House
- Suburban Guerilla
- Booman Tribune
- All-Spin Zone
- Philly (Dragonballyee)
- Afro-Netizen
- Rowhouse Logic
- MyDD
- Bad Attitudes
- Billmon
- iFlipFlop
- CorrenteWire
- upyernoz
- Tattered Coat
- Fables of the Reconstruction
- Slacktivist
- Citizen Mom
- The Next Mayor
- Philly Future
- Philadelphia Will Do
- Philebrity
- Young Philly Politics
- Phillyblog
- Welcome to Phillyville
- Phawker
- A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
- Keystone Blog
- Philadelphia - America's Hometown
- BlankBaby
- Above Average Jane
- Phillyist
- Metroblogging Philadelphia
- The Clog
- Josh Marshall
- Daily Kos
- Juan Cole
- Oliver Willis
- Andy Borowitz
- War and Piece
- Wonkette
- BuzzFlash
- Raw Story
- Cursor
- Crooks and Liars
- Swing State Project
- Kevin Drum
- Talk Left
- AmericaBlog
- Hullabaloo
- Mad Kane
- Think Progress
- Jesus' General
- The Carpetbagger Report
- Majikthise
- Echidne of the Snakes
- David Sirota
- Glenn Greenwald
- TBogg
- Fire Dog Lake
- Taylor Marsh
- Matthew Yglesias
- Jon Swift
- Drudge Report
- Beer Leaguer
- The 700 Level
- Dick Polman
- Balls, Sticks and Stuff
- Shallow Center
- Philling Station
- Phillies Nation
- A Citizen's Blog
- The Good Phight
- Romenesko
- Editor and Publisher
- Pressthink
- Buzzmachine
- The Inksniffer
- Media Bloodhound
- Eat the Press
- Mickey Kaus
- Media (Huffington Post)
- Blinq
- The Corner
- Instapundit
- Andrew Sullivan
- Free Republic
- James Taranto
- Blonde Sagacity
- ScrappleFace
- Blogorrhea
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- News | Sports | Business | What's Happening | Restaurants & Food | Entertainment | Living | Marketplace | Jobs
