
The ombudsman for NPR, Alicia Shepard, has an excellent piece out today on the media coverage of the Gov. Rod Blagojevich case, and I've been thinking of the same lines. Even a foul-mouthed sleazeball dirty dealing politician -- and Blago is certifiably that -- should be innocent until proven guilty, but it sure feels like it's been the other way around. And Shepard seizes on one of the main culprits -- the swashbuckling prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald:
Blagojevich coverage by NPR and other news outlets is an example of how the media often fail to restrain themselves when a voluble law enforcement official chooses to talk. In this case, there was an easily perceptible tone portraying the prosecutor as the good guy and the defendant as the dark villain -- while the journalists were astonished.
Granted, Blagojevich is not someone who engenders compassion. His foul language, crass approach and arrogance toward the media and political system make him an easy target. Add to that, sensational charges filed by a high-profile, popular prosecutor who convicted former vice presidential aide Scooter Libby of perjury and obstructing the FBI in the Valerie Plame case.
"Blagojevich is hardly a sympathetic character but that doesn't mean we should be intentionally unfair," said Bob Steele, journalism values scholar at the Poynter Institute. "But it is harder to be fair when you have somebody who has behaved as he has. I find it very challenging for journalists to be able to achieve that level of fairness where many cards are faced down and the person accused is taking a hell or high water approach."
Look, journalists pay lip-service to the rule of law but let's be brutally honest, there's one area of law that reporters have no respect for, and that is any law or legal procedure that blocks journalists from getting as much juicy information in print or on the air as quickly as possible, even when those restrictions have merit. When I watched Fitzgerald on TV the morning that Blagojevich, I was stunned by some of the prejudicial things that the lawman was saying, and I think some of the reporters in the room were too. But a journalist is mainly excited by the incredible quotes and soundbites thrown out there by the swaggering prosecutor -- no one is going to stand up and say, "Should really be saying that?," not at the time and then not after the fact, either..Granted, Blagojevich is not someone who engenders compassion. His foul language, crass approach and arrogance toward the media and political system make him an easy target. Add to that, sensational charges filed by a high-profile, popular prosecutor who convicted former vice presidential aide Scooter Libby of perjury and obstructing the FBI in the Valerie Plame case.
"Blagojevich is hardly a sympathetic character but that doesn't mean we should be intentionally unfair," said Bob Steele, journalism values scholar at the Poynter Institute. "But it is harder to be fair when you have somebody who has behaved as he has. I find it very challenging for journalists to be able to achieve that level of fairness where many cards are faced down and the person accused is taking a hell or high water approach."
Meanwhile, I don't see now how Blago could get a trial within a 500 mile radius of Chicago. And the governor's-trial-and-conviction-by-press-conference has had some powerful consequences. It was in good measure the power of the verbal charges lobbed by Fitzgerald that caused the remarkably inept Sen. Harry Reid and others to quickly assert they would not seat anyone Blagojevich named to Obama's Senate seat -- when it's increasingly obvious they have neither the power nor right to do so.
To be clear yet again, I think Blago is a sleazy and remarkably unqualified governor, and I'm sitting here in Philadelphia as I write that, which should count for something. I'm not talking about the person but the process, and the process here has gotten increasingly screwed up in a way that traces back to the circumstances of Blago's arrest and the sweeping assertions that Fitzgerald made in public. Every story I've seen recently -- and that is literally a dozen or more each day -- leans strongly on the angle that Blago was selling the Senate seat when he's had no chance yet to make his legal defense, which is likely to be that he said dumb things but committed no crime, especially since he eventually appointed someone, Roland Burris, who by all accounts was not engaged in buying the Senate seat.
You know, there is an irony here that I have yet to see anyone comment on yet. Many people, myself included, believe that one of the greatest travesties of the Bush-Cheney years was the zealous and ultimately successful effort to throw a state governor, Don Siegelman of Alabama, behind bars in a prosecution that seemed ridiculously tainted by politics. At the core, the cases seem very different; I personally believe that Siegelman was railroaded while Blago is in a heap 'o trouble. But the bottom line is that Siegelman clearly didn't get the justice he deserved. But if the former Alabama governor should have had a fair trial and an above-board prosecution, then Rod Blagojevich should have that as well.
Posted by Will Bunch @ 10:02 PM
Permalink |
28 comments
What were the stunningly prejudicial things that Fitz said? He laid out the charges, and presumably he has evidence to support each charge he made. Are you advocating that no charges or evidence be made public until they are presented during a trial? If not, what is it, specifically, about what Fitz did that you think was inappropriate?
Is there anyway to embarrass a politician out of office, or for that matter can we embarrass a politician at all.........?
TPS, I don't remember that Blago was formally charged with the act of making "Lincoln roll over in his grave." Also, is there a formal charge of "political corruption crime spree"?
TPS ah my little grasshopper can I call you grasshopper?
I bring you greetings from the world of reality. You presume too much.
Why not sit back and wait for the wheels of justice to turn? You don't seem to be going anywhere..........
Comment removed.
Alright. Maybe a tad hyperbolic.
BTW, Will didn't mention whether Blago is a Democrat. I've searched and searched, but I just can't find what party Blago's from. Can any of you geniuses who know how to get past the vast left-wing media conspiracy smokescreen find out whether Blago is a Dem or a Rep? Thanks in advance.
I think that fitzgerald was protecting emanuel and obama. duing the first conversation emanuel offered nothing. he would have eventually come back with an offer (on tape) that would have embarrased obama. remember this is politics and it is played out in every town as business as usual.
The press had a field day with Blago because they were mad at him for tainting their Messiah. For bringing the ugly sewer of Barack's Chicago Democrat corruption on to the world stage for the entire planet to see so soon after his "glorious" election ("glorious" - Michele Norris, NPR). Our watchdog media had successfully suppressed any mention of the Chicago sewer in the run up to the election, and then Blago had to ruin it all, so they pounced on the poor fella.
What's a prosecutor to do? Taped evidence of a Governor offering up a Senate seat to the highest bidder when said seat was occupied by the president elect whose Chief of Staff was deeply embedded in the political machinations of the state. Personally I would take it one step at a time.
No one hid the muck of Chicago politics during the campaign. It was out there. Also, is there anyone who is even marginally informed that doesn't know the history of Chi Town pols? Additionally, the campaign was about issues that were, by and large, on a larger stage, such as; should we be at war, how do we help the economy, how do people pay for healthcare. Stuff like that. Unless Obama was accused of something specific, any mention of the Chicago political milieu would be just so much "background."
To the larger point here, however. I agree with Will. Despite Blago's obvious faults, this has witch hunt written all over it. Fitzgerald is playing a dangerous game here, and we can only hope his statements haven't so tainted the jury pool, or the case in general, that Blago will walk....providing he's guilty, of course...
The thing I've noticed recently, is that Blago has shown himself to be a master at political gamesmanship. That doesn't mean that he's not a scumbag as well, but you'd have to wonder, if he's that smart, why was he acting so stupidly? Roland Burris looks like a bit of a goof, but you have to respect an honest man who won't back down when everybody tells him he should, & can still act like a gentleman.
Although it turns out to be a crock most of the time, every one that goes through the US justice system is innocent until proven guilty. Even when it is likely he is guilty as sin. I think 8 years of GWB has made everyone thing laws dont apply to politicians
Although it turns out to be a crock most of the time, every one that goes through the US justice system is innocent until proven guilty. Even when it is likely he is guilty as sin. I think 8 years of GWB has made everyone thing laws dont apply to politicians
Since when did the presumption of innocence apply to media coverage? It doesn't.....and shouldn't.
28 comments | View All Comments | View All By Latest
- Atrios
- Kiko's House
- Suburban Guerilla
- Booman Tribune
- All-Spin Zone
- Philly (Dragonballyee)
- Afro-Netizen
- Rowhouse Logic
- MyDD
- Bad Attitudes
- Billmon
- iFlipFlop
- CorrenteWire
- upyernoz
- Tattered Coat
- Fables of the Reconstruction
- Slacktivist
- Citizen Mom
- The Next Mayor
- Philly Future
- Philadelphia Will Do
- Philebrity
- Young Philly Politics
- Phillyblog
- Welcome to Phillyville
- Phawker
- A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
- Keystone Blog
- Philadelphia - America's Hometown
- BlankBaby
- Above Average Jane
- Phillyist
- Metroblogging Philadelphia
- The Clog
- Josh Marshall
- Daily Kos
- Juan Cole
- Oliver Willis
- Andy Borowitz
- War and Piece
- Wonkette
- BuzzFlash
- Raw Story
- Cursor
- Crooks and Liars
- Swing State Project
- Kevin Drum
- Talk Left
- AmericaBlog
- Hullabaloo
- Mad Kane
- Think Progress
- Jesus' General
- The Carpetbagger Report
- Majikthise
- Echidne of the Snakes
- David Sirota
- Glenn Greenwald
- TBogg
- Fire Dog Lake
- Taylor Marsh
- Matthew Yglesias
- Jon Swift
- Drudge Report
- Beer Leaguer
- The 700 Level
- Dick Polman
- Balls, Sticks and Stuff
- Shallow Center
- Philling Station
- Phillies Nation
- A Citizen's Blog
- The Good Phight
- Romenesko
- Editor and Publisher
- Pressthink
- Buzzmachine
- The Inksniffer
- Media Bloodhound
- Eat the Press
- Mickey Kaus
- Media (Huffington Post)
- Blinq
- The Corner
- Instapundit
- Andrew Sullivan
- Free Republic
- James Taranto
- Blonde Sagacity
- ScrappleFace
- Blogorrhea
Blog Roll
- February
- January
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
Archives





