Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Tuesday, May 21, 2013

UPDATED: Here comes the (Obama-picked) judge!

News blogs, sports blogs, entertainment blogs, and more from Philly.com, The Philadelphia Inquirer and the Philadelphia Daily News.

122 comments

UPDATED: Here comes the (Obama-picked) judge!

POSTED: Thursday, April 30, 2009, 10:41 PM

Something of a shocker in D.C. tonight as Supreme Court Justice David Souter prepares to announce his resignation. At 69, he's nowhere near the typical retirement age for the Supremes -- but he's also a sane person who hates living in Washington. Bully for him. Souter was like that movie character who shows up an enigma (thank you, George H.W. Bush) but turns out to be a pretty good guy by the final reel. It's ironic this happens the same week that Specter switches parties -- talk about the end of the road for moderate Northeastern GOPers!

For Obama, it's a chance to try on some cosmetics. What do I mean by that? He's going to replace a Republican dude who turned out to be a liberal with a Democratic female who we'll know is a liberal. So the court will look different, but in terms of the law, nothing changes. Ironically, Obama could leave a huge stamp on the court, with two or three appointments in just the current term, without changing the ideology of the Supremes at all, because it's the liberal wing with more age and health issues.

Of course, you know who would make a great appointment to the High Court, in terms of legal training (if not courtroom experience), judicial temperment, and age? Barack Obama. Maybe in January 2017, when he's nearly 56 and figuring out what to do with the rest of his life.

UPDATE: Ding ding ding, we have an early frontrunner, and that would be federal appeals judge Sonia Sotomayor, straight outta the Bronx:

After growing up in a Bronx housing project, Sotomayor has risen to become a judge on one of the most powerful courts in the land: the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit. As a Hispanic woman, Sotomayor would make an attractive candidate if Obama is looking to diversify the court. There has never been a Hispanic on the Supreme Court, and there is only one woman currently on the bench, Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Sotomayor might also have bipartisan appeal. She is politically moderate, and President George H.W. Bush appointed her to her first judgeship.

Female, Latina, moderate...how could he not pick her?

Actually, I'd like to see Obama select I Want Revenge, because a) America really should have a judge with that name and b) there has never been a non-human named to the High Court before, at least to the best of my recollection.

Will Bunch @ 10:41 PM  Permalink | 122 comments
122 comments
Comments  (122)
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:59 PM, 04/30/2009
    Obama was not very accomplished as a lawyer. Read the LA times article about his law career- he spent four years as a lawyer before he brought hope and change and the yes we can to the IL state senate. According to the article he worked on about 30 cases total. And yes I know he was a part time law professor but I'm not sure that qualifies him to be on the Supreme Court. But then again Bunch you've been so high on hope lately I wouldn't expect you to notice something like that.
    beeron
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:59 PM, 04/30/2009
    Typical Will, looking for someone to legislate from the bench and not interperate the constitution as it applies to the law. Of couse Obama, the ultimate political animal, would be a no brainer.......literally.
    Earl J
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:06 PM, 04/30/2009
    You guys have to get a sense of humor.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:09 PM, 04/30/2009
    Interpret the Constitution as it applies to the law...you mean like the Bush v. Gore ruling? No politics there :-)
    will
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:11 PM, 04/30/2009
    How about we give the right wingnuts something to talk about for a long time? How about Bill Clinton? Wouldn't you love to see the questioning from the bench between him and Scalia? Rushie boy and the faux news phonies would be blowing a gasket for the 25 years! What a hoot!
    philasportsfan
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:12 PM, 04/30/2009
    President Bill Clinton would be great. Or maybe Ralph Nader. Or Al Gore, so many choices!! What is that sound I am hearing? Michael Savage's head exploding or was that Glenn Beck sounding the alarm of neo-stalinist facism?
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:17 PM, 04/30/2009
    Michael Moore would be absolutely hilarious, but also potentially dangerous. It would drive Republican toadies even further over the edge. They'd pick up their assault weapons they use for "hunting" (what a crock) and prove to us just why they really were so upset that the DHS warned about violent right-wing extremists.
    Talking point sleuth
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:21 PM, 04/30/2009
    replace souter with the biggest liberal possible so will bunch will be satisfied. especially the ones who like to reference foreign law to render decisions.
    dpcoz
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:23 PM, 04/30/2009
    Pass the popcorn: --snip-- Republican Sens. Orrin Hatch and George Voinovich blamed the Club for Growth for imposing a right-wing litmus test that chased Arlen Specter out of the Republican Party. The Club for Growth blamed Specter — first for helping to ruin the GOP and then for leaving it. A leading Republican strategist blamed the party for turning its back on moderates. Sen. Lindsey Graham sniped at Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele. Specter’s pollster blamed the stimulus bill. Karl Rove blamed Specter himself... Mr. [Lindsey] Graham scoffed at the notion that the party was suffering because it was not conservative enough. "Do you really believe that we lost 18-to-34-year-olds by 19 percent, or we lost Hispanic voters, because we are not conservative enough?" he said. "No. This is a ridiculous line of thought. The truth is we lost young people because our Republican brand is tainted." --snip-- LOL! How bad is it when a guy named "Lindsey" is the only one in your party that's talking sense?
    Talking point sleuth
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:23 PM, 04/30/2009
    Will, Bush vs. Gore was decided on the law as it was written, not as how Gore wanted it to be. They stuck to the letter of the law, whereas Gore's lawyers wanted it to say something it didn't. Better put, they were claiming something that wasn't there. Bottom line, his appointment won't change the makeup of the court. I'm grateful for that much.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:30 PM, 04/30/2009
    Will Bunch is a punk wimp a_ _ kisser for the Dem Lib party. At the same time. he fails to realize that any Dem replacement for Souter is still a lib. No loss, no gain Will Bunch, you are an idiot.
    eagle8
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:34 PM, 04/30/2009
    The nomination will be a liberal that will further destroy this country.
    flyers stink
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:36 PM, 04/30/2009
    Good point, georgie. Clearly, only the libz on SCOTUS allow politics to enter their positions on issues. The fact that the Republicans on SCOTUS voted lockstep in favor of Bush (and vote on virtually ALL other issues in alignment with Republican policies) was pure coincidence, and based only on objective legal analysis.
    Talking point sleuth
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:36 PM, 04/30/2009
    Checks and balances has nothing to do with political parties, bill a. Checks and balances refers to the distribution of power between the three branches of federal government. You may be trying to make a particularly intelligent argument (something that rarely happens on this website) about Specter joining the party in Article II power, but somehow I doubt it. Will, Michelle Obama practiced law for some years more than her husband. She's more qualified to be on the Court than he is. Heck, if that's your only measure, I'm more qualified than both.
    BlairW


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  | 
About this blog
Will Bunch, a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News, blogs about his obsessions, including national and local politics and world affairs, the media, pop music, the Philadelphia Phillies, soccer and other sports, not necessarily in that order.

PLEASE COMMENT WITH PASSION...

...but not with racial slurs, potentially libelous allegations, obscenities or other juvenile noise. Such comments will, at our discretion, be deleted in their entirety, and repeat offenders will be blocked from commenting. ALSO: Any commenter advocating killing any government official will be immediately banned.

Reach Will at bunchw@phillynews.com.

Will Bunch
Blog archives:
Past Archives:
Blog Roll