
I thought this was the best piece of punditry of the 2008 campaign season, offered last night by David Gergen, who mainly served Republicans but who worked briefly in the Clinton White House. It came last night on CNN with Anderson Cooper (via Nexis):
GERGEN: And it also raises the question in my judgment of whether she shouldn't say, you know, if you want to vote against him because he's black, I don't want your vote. I don't want to win that way. This has no place in this primary.
COOPER: Do you see her saying that?
GERGEN: Well, she has been a champion -- she's been a champion of civil rights for a long, long time. She and her husband both have I think well-earned reputations in the civil rights front. She's never had redneck votes before in her life.
I see no reason why she couldn't take the high road here in the closing days of his campaign and try to take this on and take on the Reverend Wright issue to say, "Look, I campaigned with this fellow for 15 months. I know a lot of you people don't think he shares your values that somehow Barack thinks like Reverend Wright. Not true. I know him. I have been with him. And race should come out of this."
I think she could do a lot by taking a high road.
Barring a late scandal, I don't see how Clinton gains the nomination, so why not play for the history books, and create some goodwill that might lead somewhere a couple years down the road? Such a speech would go a long way toward that.
High road, low road, country road.... I thik Hillary will take any vote she can get right now. The press has written her chances off, but I don't think she has written anything off just yet. Molly
She can't afford to give an inch to Obama now, he's too close to the nomination. She cannot afford to let him win in November. She knows what waiting eight years did to George H. Bush and John McCain. The heck with what happens to the country, she's supposed to be the President. SteveMG
Should Obama give a similar speech to the black populace saying (in effect), "don't vote for me simply due to racial preferences, vote for me because you agree with the policy positions that I hold. If you're going to vote for me simply because my father was of the same race as your father, I don't want your vote. I don't want to win that way. This has no place in this primary?" legatus
Legatus is right--that stance goes both ways. Captain Awesome- Jeez, how can you be so dense, Will? Just as all the media-driven nonsense about race is beginning to die down, you'd join (get suckered by) Gergen in begging Hillary to resurrect it to a whole new level, poisoning what is yet a fertile battleground for Obama, the white working class vote, by having Hillary insult the bunch as racist for voting for her? Seriously, are you serious?
Does anybody remember how Lynn Swann did with the black vote against Ed Rendell? SteveMG
That's pretty funny, legatus, since that's basically the message that he's given his entire campaign. Try reading the speech that he gave in Philly. Talking point sleuth
That's pretty funny, legatus, since that's basically the message that he's given his entire campaign. Try reading the speech that he gave in Philly. Talking point sleuth
Comment removed.
"since that's basically the message that he's given his entire campaign. Try reading the speech that he gave in Philly. Posted by Talking point sleuth" If that's the message that he gave, it apparently hasn't resonated with its intended recipients. Numbers don't lie. legatus
and you do everything every politician tells you to do, right legatus? hikikomori
It's nto her responsibility to give this type of speech. All she can do is campaign for him, if he secures the nomination. Those who won't vote for him because of his color can't be convinced. RG
It's nto her responsibility to give this type of speech. All she can do is campaign for him, if he secures the nomination. Those who won't vote for him because of his color can't be convinced. RG
Bad advice, Will. Even mentioning Rev. Wrong is the worst thing she could do to Obama. There will be enough people who will do plenty to keep that alive; she would do her party no service by helping them out. And saying "don't vote for me for racial reasons" is the worst kind of two-edged sword. I do think there is a difference between blacks who would vote for Obama because it is a chance for a historic first and whites who would vote against him just because "they don't want no (you know what word goes here) President" - it's the difference between positive pride in a unique achievment and negative old-fashioned racist hatred - but it is still a dicey situation to bring up. (And in saying this, I am not implying at all that every white person who votes against Obama is racist. It is totally respectable to vote against someone because you don't agree with their positions, and just as with white conservatives, there are black conservatives who will not vote for Obama because they simply do not agree with liberal policies.) She should stay in until the day after the last primary (I believe June 3?) then gracefully bow out. I hope she has it in her to do that. what is truth?
Kind of late to take the high road isn't it, after all she and Bill have done to pander to white racist votes and since there are essentially no important primaries left (Puerto Rico doesn't even get an electoral vote in the Fall). All of her last primary wins have been suspect because it's so hard to tell how many of the voters were actually republicans and right leaning Independents who were voting for Hillary as part of the Republican Create Chaos plan and wouldn't vote for Hillary even if she got the nomination (which 6% of her voters actually admitted in Indiana, more than her "winning margin"). Don't expect much class from the "Me First" Clinton contingent. atp2007
- Atrios
- Kiko's House
- Suburban Guerilla
- Booman Tribune
- All-Spin Zone
- Philly (Dragonballyee)
- Afro-Netizen
- Rowhouse Logic
- MyDD
- Bad Attitudes
- Billmon
- iFlipFlop
- CorrenteWire
- upyernoz
- Tattered Coat
- Fables of the Reconstruction
- Slacktivist
- Citizen Mom
- The Next Mayor
- Philly Future
- Philadelphia Will Do
- Philebrity
- Young Philly Politics
- Phillyblog
- Welcome to Phillyville
- Phawker
- A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
- Keystone Blog
- Philadelphia - America's Hometown
- BlankBaby
- Above Average Jane
- Phillyist
- Metroblogging Philadelphia
- The Clog
- Josh Marshall
- Daily Kos
- Juan Cole
- Oliver Willis
- Andy Borowitz
- War and Piece
- Wonkette
- BuzzFlash
- Raw Story
- Cursor
- Crooks and Liars
- Swing State Project
- Kevin Drum
- Talk Left
- AmericaBlog
- Hullabaloo
- Mad Kane
- Think Progress
- Jesus' General
- The Carpetbagger Report
- Majikthise
- Echidne of the Snakes
- David Sirota
- Glenn Greenwald
- TBogg
- Fire Dog Lake
- Taylor Marsh
- Matthew Yglesias
- Jon Swift
- Drudge Report
- Beer Leaguer
- The 700 Level
- Dick Polman
- Balls, Sticks and Stuff
- Shallow Center
- Philling Station
- Phillies Nation
- A Citizen's Blog
- The Good Phight
- Romenesko
- Editor and Publisher
- Pressthink
- Buzzmachine
- The Inksniffer
- Media Bloodhound
- Eat the Press
- Mickey Kaus
- Media (Huffington Post)
- Blinq
- The Corner
- Instapundit
- Andrew Sullivan
- Free Republic
- James Taranto
- Blonde Sagacity
- ScrappleFace
- Blogorrhea
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008








