Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Don't be fooled -- the Tea Party won bigtime in Arizona

94 comments

Don't be fooled -- the Tea Party won bigtime in Arizona

POSTED: Tuesday, August 24, 2010, 10:18 PM

 

As I begin writing this, the polls aren't quite closed yet in Arizona but it seems pretty likely that John McCain -- who has been the target of emnity from Tea Partiers and the more extreme right of the GOP ever since Nov. 3, 2008, the day he failed to save America from "the scourge of Barack Obama" -- is cruising to a big Republican primary victory over ultra-conservative xenophobe ex-congressman J. D. Hayworth.

I spent several days in Arizona back in March reporting for my new book "The Backlash." My sense from talking to a lot of conservatives -- including a kind of "Brooks Brothers riot" of raucous right-wingers that erupted against health care reform in front of the American Apparel and P.F. Chang's in the gold-plated main crossroad of Scottsdale -- was that anger over McCain's past moderation on issues like immigration reform was palpable and that the 2008 GOP standard bearer was highly defeatable.

By just about conservative who was not J.D. Hayworth, that is. I also spent several hours with or around the former pal of disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff on a lazy Saturday morning at a dialing-for-dollars event inside a big tent at a Scottsdale resort. The lack of energy was palpable -- the event was underattended and those who did turn out seemed a lot more inspired by the pink-underwear-enforcing tough guy persona of Hayworth's top ally, hardcore Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Hayworth practically wore the adjective "unctious" across his sloped forehead, looking  and sounding every bit like the cheesy free-government-cash pitchman he was later devastatingly revealed to have been.

But Hayworth still did garner substantial backing from elements of the Arizona Tea Parties and noxious, nativist groups like ALI-PAC and over-the-top Minuteman activist Chris Simcox. And so now many pundits will be racing tonight to portray McCain's landslide victory as a crushing defeat for the Tea Party movement.

Don't believe that for one minute. To the contrary, the right-wing GOP primary challenge to McCain has proved to be the most glorious victory for the right-wing backlash against Obama of any election in 2010, even more so than the Senate primary victories for extremists like Sharron Angle of Nevada or Kentucky's Rand Paul. That's because the minute that McCain -- a chronic flip-flopper who makes the alleged "wind surfing" of Sen. John Kerry look like the 100-meter dash -- realized he was in the political fight of the lifetime, he moved so far to the right that he took any faint hope of political progress in Washington along with him as he plunged into the radical ravine of the Arizona highways.

The political playing fields of Arizona is the place where any hope of adult political activity in the capital in the second year of Obama's presidency  -- at least some kind of effort to pass an energy bill that would acknowledge climate change, for example, or a grown-up compromise on immigration reform that would have averted the xenophobic nonsense that's now taking place -- instead went to die in the hot desert sands.

Let's review.

Immigration reform: In 2006, McCain was arguably the most prominent advocate in Congress for comprehensive immigration reform -- including a pathway to eventual citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants now in the United States. When that effort -- which received a remarkable 30 GOP Senate votes initially -- failed and McCain entered the 2008 primaries, his position was more muddled but he did speak eloquently at times of the need to treat immigrants as "God's children."

Then along came the Tea Party and Hayworth. In 2010, McCain's entire spiel on immigration consists of "build the dang fence." Not only is he not working on comprehensive immigration reform, but he won't look at tamer measures like the so-called DREAM Act that would support undocumented students. His reversal on the subject has had a chilling effect on the prospects of reform, and may have influenced his closest ally Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who also stopped adovocating for a path to citizenship and recently even called for a review of the 14th Amendment and birthright citizenship. In addition, McCain issued a bizarre and arguably cowardly endorsement of Arizona's racial profiling law, SB 1070.

Climate change:  In running for president in 2008, McCain assured the American people that he took the problem of manmade global warming very seriously and that he would make the issue a hallmark of his presidency if elected. Even after he lost Obama, McCain could have moved to unite the small band of potential GOP moderates on the issue, including his ally Graham who once said called the Arizona senator " the guy that introduced me to the climate problem."

But McCain pulled a 180 on global warming as the Tea Party gained strength in the fall of 2009. As summed up last November by Politico:

McCain refers to the bill as “cap and tax,” calls the climate legislation that passed the House in June “a 1,400-page monstrosity” and dismisses a cap-and-trade proposal included in the White House budget as “a government slush fund.” 

The loss of McCain was essentially a death knell for climate change legislation -- even in a year of record global temperatures, collapsing glaciers and an ice-free Arctic -- especially as his also-under-Tea-Party-pressure protogee Graham back-slid rightward with him.

"Don't ask, don't tell." McCain's backflip to the extreme right on gays serving openly in the military arguably doesn't carry the same policy weight as his critical about-face turns on climate change and immigration, but his move was so stunning it did show his willingness to cave to the paranoid style on virtually any issue facing America at the dawn of this new decade.

McCain -- who had said back in 2006 that he would be guided by military leaders -- told Gates and Mullen that he was "disappointed" with the testimony. Overturning the law would "be a substantial and controversial change to a policy that has been successful for two decades," he said in his opening statement. "It would also present yet another challenge to our military at a time of already tremendous stress and strain... At this moment of immense hardship for our armed services, we should not be seeking to overturn the 'Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell' policy."

There's much, much more -- McCain's failure to support stimulus measures that would bail out Main Street after he led the fight to spend $700 billion to save Wall Street, his likely vote to extend the Bush tax cuts for the rich that he actually voted against in the early 2000s. The recovered "maverick" is now just a predictable cog in "the Party of No."

And all of this happened because McCain buckled in the face of an angry Tea Party and did exactly what anyone who's watched his long career unfold in Washington probably could have predicted he would do -- which is to say or do anything to save his own political rear end. Arizona is the place where the extreme right successfully derailed the promise of real change that America's silent majority voted for in 2008. Their secret was they didn't have to actually elect the hapless J.D. Hayworth to do this. All they had to do was honk their horns on a Scottsdale street corner, wave their angry signs and say, "Boo!"

UPDATE: McCain wins.

America already lost.

Will Bunch @ 10:18 PM  Permalink | 94 comments
94 comments
Comments  (94)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:26 PM, 08/25/2010
    Actually, bill.atkins, scratch that offer to compare my positions on the issues with yours. Now that I think about it, the main position I recall you taking on anything is that Bunch is an idiot. When you get some actual opinions that you're prepared to "debate on merit," then we'll talk.
    Billy Ray Winthorpe
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:30 PM, 08/25/2010
    Billy Ray, it might be a loooooong wait. We don't call him Batty for nothin'!
    Hamlet
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:36 PM, 08/25/2010
    Well, that's interesting. Here's a picture of the Welsh Defense League burning a Nazi flag....oh, wait. They're burning an anti-Nazi flag. My bad. Nice to see what kind of folks you share political ideology with, PAEnglish. http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/12/27/article-1238213-06DC7B58000005DC-160_634x369.jpg
    Talking point sleuth
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:41 PM, 08/25/2010
    More English Defense League Nazi salutes. Nice buds you got there, PAEnglish: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktjgruyxrhk&feature=player_embedded#at=11
    Talking point sleuth
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:42 PM, 08/25/2010
    More English Defense League, more Nazi salutes: Nice buds you got there, PAEnglish: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIoX0wpt7dU&feature=player_embedded
    Talking point sleuth
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:52 PM, 08/25/2010
    bill.atkins-Glad to see I'm not the only one that thought that way about Eric Gregg.Those fools on WIP had him ready for Cooperstown
    Yankee Air Pirate 12
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:55 PM, 08/25/2010
    All of these posts are very thought provoking, but I'd like each of you to get out and purchase some durable goods - please. My clients need some good news about the economy and the Nov mid-terms are still 9 weeks away.
    A Friend
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:25 PM, 08/25/2010
    PJ, thanks for the recommendation. I've heard of that book before. I'll check it out....Yankee Air Pirate, Eric Gregg stunk as an umpire. He wasn't even that entertaining as a host at Chickie & Pete's.
    Captain Awesome
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:27 PM, 08/25/2010
    General, I took it as intended and had a good laugh myself.
    Les Ismore
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:04 PM, 08/25/2010
    TPOS when you have something sensible to say then let us know.. until then your still a racist sexist POS
    PAEnglish
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:14 PM, 08/25/2010
    TPOS is running around for some reason complaining about a group he knows nothing about but as he cant get the better of me in any other argument he thinks this is the one. However my post was simple, A group calling itself the Anti Nazi League containing every extreme left wing group in England including anarchists, communists, and radical muslims, a group that causes violence at every demonstration they create are allowed to march in a town where a march planned by a right leaning group is banned, and libs call that democracy. As I said in a previous post that TPOS has to ignore as it makes his posts worthless, or rather more worthless than usual, I said libs are ignoring the majority forcing people to start supporting the far right, this cannot be allowed to happen here. In England the EDL are portrayed as racist by the liberal press, are there racists in the EDL probably but they are not the real extremists that title belongs to the BNP and NF, not that TPOS understands that as google is a little limiting.. anyway heres the EDL website, see how extremist it is and decide if TPOS is yet again projecting his racism on others as usual.... http://www.englishdefenceleague.org/
    PAEnglish
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:29 PM, 08/25/2010
    ===]]] In England the EDL are portrayed as racist by the liberal press, [[[=== Too funny. The fact that they give Nazi salutes at all of their events, that they tattoo swastika's on their bodies, that they burn anti-Nazi flags - all irrelevant, and just the "liberal press" "portraying" them as racist. Oh, my sides. If I only went to the EDL website, I wouldn't see the pictures of WHAT THEY DO AT THEIR RALLIES. Absolutely hilarious, PAEnglish.
    Talking point sleuth
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:31 PM, 08/25/2010
    ---]]] the real extremists that title belongs to the BNP and NF, [[[===]]] Right. Nazi-saluting, swastika tattooed, anti-Nazi flag-burners aren't "real extremists." PAEnglish, you are absolutely hilarious.
    Talking point sleuth
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:37 PM, 08/25/2010
    ===]]] and not some kind of personal affront (as some do on this site, calling people a "grammar marm), [[[===]]] I never take comments on my grammar as an "affront," bucky, my grammar often stinks and there's no hiding it. I only see comments on my grammar as evidence that someone is a grammar marm. But wow, I guess that really struck home, huh?
    Talking point sleuth
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:44 PM, 08/25/2010
    TPS, what does the EDL have to do with this conversation at all????
    IggleFan68


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  | 
About this blog
Will Bunch, a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News, blogs about his obsessions, including national and local politics and world affairs, the media, pop music, the Philadelphia Phillies, soccer and other sports, not necessarily in that order.

PLEASE COMMENT WITH PASSION...

...but not with racial slurs, potentially libelous allegations, obscenities or other juvenile noise. Such comments will, at our discretion, be deleted in their entirety, and repeat offenders will be blocked from commenting. ALSO: Any commenter advocating killing any government official will be immediately banned.

Reach Will at bunchw@phillynews.com.

Will Bunch
Blog archives:
Past Archives:
Blog Roll